Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

56
Media: white supremacist gang known as 'Black Men' may cost Stacey Abrams re-election as guvnah of Georgia (nitter.net)
posted 3 years ago by AntonioOfVenice 3 years ago by AntonioOfVenice +56 / -0
Clifton Duncan (She/Her) (@cliftonaduncan)
Stacey Abrams will lose Georgia's gubernatorial race, and it appears the intellegentsia already have a scapegoat firmly in mind.
nitter.net
60 comments share
60 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (60)
sorted by:
▲ 23 ▼
– FuckGenderPolitics 23 points 3 years ago +23 / -0

Will she concede the legitimacy of her loss this time? I hear that challenging an election's results is a horrible threat to democracy and must be stopped at all costs.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 21 points 3 years ago +21 / -0

All principles espoused by the regime are true enough, but when "except when we do it" is appended to it.

Supporting Nazis is bad, except when we do it.

Invading countries is bad, except when we do it.

Using cluster munitions is bad, except when we do it.

Human rights violations are bad, except when we do it.

Basically anything.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– acp_k2win 16 points 3 years ago +16 / -0

They have only one principle "does this forward the agenda of global communism?" It doesn't matter what "flavor" of dirty commie you are dealing with, feminist, "environmentalist", race marxist, political faggot, fat woman, etc. the principle still applies.

If the activity does support global communism then its good and true, if it doesn't then it is evil and false.

Once you understand that the other side becomes perfectly consistent, and quite predictable.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Sneak_King 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

It's absolutely hilarious that "fat women" is indeed a sect of modern communism and it's not even hard to connect the dots.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– acp_k2win 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Once you realize commies arent limited to economics but have the ultimate goal of continuously corrupting all natural heirarchies then things become much more understandable.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– OldBullLee 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Commies abandoned their silly economic argument decades ago. They are full-on Liberators of the Intersectionally Marginalized now.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Sneak_King 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Oh, I know. Some of them are possessed by demons, some of them just are demons.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– dekachin 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Are we talking about Russia or the Democrats here? hahhhh ba dum tsss

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

It's a universal rule of humanity, but especially pronounced as Russia isn't spending a lot of its time lecturing the world on these matters.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Smith1980 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

Did they ever explain how it was ok for her to question elections?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Anything they do is OK, anything you do is bad.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– dekachin 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

5 minutes of Democrats engaging in "election denial"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– reidj 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

It's only a threat when you question the legitimacy of a Democrat's win. When they questioned the legitimacy of the elections in 2000, 2004, and 2016, it was stunning and brave.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– Ahaus667 19 points 3 years ago +19 / -0

Ahh, the Oprah Dilemma, where actual black men realize these cunts don’t represent their values. One of the most disgusting things I ever saw was a military buddy of mine (center-left) get reamed out for saying he wouldn’t vote for Oprah. His aunt took offense because “she understood black people”….

permalink save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 21 points 3 years ago +21 / -0

No one understands black people better than a ... billionaire.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Ahaus667 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

Hey now, BLM only made female millionaires

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– FromTheShadows 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

And only a billionaire TV personality who's given free reign to say whatever the hell she wants without consequence would know how oppressed black people are in America and the rest of the First World.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– deleted 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– dekachin 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

it only works if you're on the Left.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– Smith1980 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

I wouldn’t vote for her either. But I am a member of the kkk so take that for what it’s worth.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Ahaus667 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

As a slavic colored person per the coalition of colored people I welcome you

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Smith1980 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Greatly appreciated

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– APDSmith 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Honestly, I'm fairly sure Democrat types really don't mind that...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 17 points 3 years ago +17 / -0

Blacks were polling at 80% for her, and this is considered alarming for Democrats.

https://archive.ph/KeX9B

AJC poll from July found that she was significantly underperforming with Black voters, with just 80 percent of the Black electorate supporting her, although Georgia Democrats usually get more than 90 percent of the Black electorate.

LOL

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– GiveThemNothing 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

Dems feel they own black voters.

Wouldn't you panic if your plantation lost 20% of its slaves.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Smith1980 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

I think it’s because they expect close to 100 percent.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

Indeed they do. When Dems get control of Congress and the White House, they fail miserably at actually governing and can no longer blame Republicans. Sometimes this costs them a few percentage points in their reliable voter blocs, and then the copium starts about how "x demographic are the new conservatives!" when said demographic votes 2% more Republican than usual.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Smith1980 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Yea. I’m whenever people say that I just say to wait and see. Now I live in Texas and locally I’ve seen a shift with Hispanic voters. Hopefully that translates nationally. Would love to see more blacks vote conservative but until I see results they will vote around 10% and you can’t abandon white people the biggest block

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

I think there will be a decent portion of Hispanics that are swing voters at least. Of course, that still leaves the question of how courting them affects Republican policies.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– OldBullLee 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Conservative Hispanics (the majority) are generally anti-amnesty/pro border control. So is every other person who went through the usual hoops to become naturalized.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I'd be more worried about Chamber of Commerce types than Hispanics regarding immigration policies.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

That part has less to do with courting voters than it does with lobbying and campaign finance.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

As usual, you hit the bullseye with your analysis.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

IDK who actually votes for Abrams. It's weird. Black women wanting to vote for someone who looks like them is the only thing that makes sense. And I didn't set out to insult black women with this statement; it is what it is.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Smith1980 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Yea but still that is absurd logic. But a lot of people follow it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– dekachin 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

According to joe biden, it's always 100% because the rest of those "poor kids" ain't black.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 11 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

80% are still going to vote for her so that's a lot of luster.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

It's a lot less one sided once you take out the worse halves.

Not sure you can have a half that's worse than the one you show us.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Black women, like all other women, vote for whatever disadvantages men the most, unless it affects them more.

So about 50% of white women believe Republicans 'disadvantages' men the most?

Literally insane.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
... continue reading thread?
▲ 7 ▼
– dekachin 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Trump tried hard to get the black vote to move a little bit in his favor. He was successful in getting some votes from orthodox jews and hispanics, but blacks remained firmly on the Democrat plantation.

But black MEN slightly less so. And it make sense that black men might be a point of vulnerability for Democrats, since black men aren't on board with their tranny faggot agenda, as Dave Chappelle did such an amazing job of demonstrating in his comedy specials.

The only thing holding black men to the Democrats is a pack of lies about how Republicans are racist, but now that hispanics [and soon, I hope, asians] are breaking for the Right, blacks are going to be the lone man out clinging to the whole race card.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Going from 91% to 89% isn't great, although it's a larger shift considering that the larger environment went against DJT.

I think what also holds the Republicans back is that a lot of blacks are poor, and they therefore like the economic agenda of the Dems.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– dekachin 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

poor whites vote Republican. Americans do not vote according to class as a rule.

Blacks vote Democrat because they've been brainwashed into dependency by libs, and into the belief that Republicans represent racism and white supremacy, and thus the only way for blacks to exist is to vote Democrat. It's a grift that Malcolm X correctly called out, yet it's been working with great success for ~50 years ever since the Democrats suddenly decided to pander to blacks in the 1960s after having been the party of the KKK and segregation for over 100 years before that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

poor whites vote Republican. Americans do not vote according to class as a rule.

Higher % than other poor people, but not even in majority, IIRC - may have changed with Trump.

Blacks vote Democrat because they've been brainwashed into dependency by libs, and into the belief that Republicans represent racism and white supremacy

This is true for wealthy blacks, who also vote Dem. It is rational for poor blacks to vote for Democrats.

since the Democrats suddenly decided to pander to blacks in the 1960s after having been the party of the KKK and segregation for over 100 years before that.

I know a relic of slavery and segregation that needs to be dismantled.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– dekachin 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

It is rational for poor blacks to vote for Democrats.

No it's not. Libtards nuked the economy with inflation and did they do it to help the poor? FUCK no. They did it to help rich liberals with fat electric car subsidies.

Democrats fool people like you into thinking they're the party of the poor, but that's all marketing. They consistently try to hook up themselves and their elite Blue friends with shit like the SALT cap repeal & free high end childcare. Hundreds of billions for solar and electric cars isn't going to help the poor at all, but it's going to be a huge pork barrel for rich blue state libs who want to install rooftop solar on their homes and buy a new $80k Tesla.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MattTheBlack 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

It is rational in the sense that low information voters like poor black people typically are would vote for the person promising free shit and help

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Smith1980 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

She is horrible. I support these white supremacists who vote against her

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– bloodguard 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Oh noes! She'll still be President of United Earth, though right?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– -Fender- 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Didn't she concede her authority in less than 5 minutes of appearance even in that show?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– LastRights 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Came here to post that. haha

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– realerfunction 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

pronouns

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

He has them as a joke. I think it's quite genius because it throws off the loons.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy