I normally like Tracey but calling the Kerch bridge attack a "terror bombing" is retarded. Trolling the Regime is fine but don't do it as the expense of your own credibility.
How was it NOT a terror attack? It was an attack on civilian infrastructure far away from the war zone. It was done because of the symbolic meaningfulness of the bridge (uniting Russian with Crimea). It was clearly a terror attack, just like the Dugin assassination.
It was a legimate military target, as that bridge was supplying the entire Russian army on the southern front. Meanwhile, Russia targeted a pedestrian bridge(and missed), a playground, and some random cars in the street in Kiev. Those had no military objective or use. Does this mean, using your definition, Russia committed a terrorist attack?
Well, they also attacked thermal power plants and electricity relay stations and such. (Not for the first time, and got hit back the same way just today.)
Yes it is you dickless dipshit. It was an attack
on civilian infrastructure without strategic importance to the war effort that served only to terrorize and demoralize Russians by hitting a symbol of putin’s reunification of crimea and Russia. How about you shut the fuck up so you don’t look any more retarded than you already do, you pathetic intellectual lightweight?
International terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups who are inspired by, or associated with, designated foreign terrorist organizations or nations (state-sponsored). - FBI
Violent, criminal acts (VBIED attack on a civilian bridge) committed by individuals and/or groups (Ukrainian SBU) inspired by, or associated with, designated foreign terrorist organizations or nations (Ukraine).
Terror attacks are attacks against civilians, not "civilian infrastructure". And it isn't "civilian infrastructure", it's dual use - it's the only route of military supply to the southern front that isn't under Ukrainian fire control. Also, it wasn't a truck bomb, that's just the excuse they're using to conceal the fact that they gave Ukraine ATACMS. Same excuse was used for the Saki airbase bombing.
I’m sorry name how many military personnel were killed or military vehicles destroyed. This was an attack against civilians and civilians infrastructure.
it isn't "civilian infrastructure", it's dual use - it's the only route of military supply to the southern front that isn't under Ukrainian fire control.
You people are just as braindead as the average woke cultist. Once you're programmed with a narrative you have no rational faculty at all, you all just mindlessly regurgitate the same drivel over and over.
It’s amazing you can’t name one military personnel or even a military structure you just keep claiming because the military also can use the bridge it’s a military strike. Tell me retard when Russia blew up a park in Kiev was it also a military strike because military personnel have visited the park before?
So, since you still talk about it, will you answerto me and tell me whose lies did you so readily believe about "the SBU office hit" that you decided to publicly repeat without any sort of evidence whatsoever?
I'm not even tell you to stop believe the liars, it's your choice to be stupid, I just need to know the source of your stuff. (It's a bad shit.)
So, since you still talk about it, will you answerto me and tell me whose lies did you so readily believe about "the SBU office hit" that you decided to publicly repeat without any sort of evidence whatsoever?
Are you offended that I thought the SBU was hit? Or do you think it's some sort of great gotcha? If it wasn't hit, it underlines my point even more - how on earth they're not even hitting the SBU 9 months in.
I'm not even tell you to stop believe the liars, it's your choice to be stupid, I just need to know the source of your stuff. (It's a bad shit.)
No doubt anything is going to be "bad shit" to someone who believes anything that's anti-Russian. I follow a lot of accounts but also take them with a grain of salt, same as the corrupt Western media. You should do the same and familiarize yourself with that grand old concept of the "fog of war".
I'm offended by your guilible naive stupidty where you continue to ever believe the lies by liars just because they tell you things. I don't know why, but you be you.
Answer to you question: They're using Soviet missiles. (And cheap Iranian "martyr" drones, that have extreme range and good bang for the price but use the same guidance system as the V2 rocket.)
Just tell me who lied to you. I won't hurt them, I promise.
This makes little sense though. How does it make anyone 'gullible' to believe reports that the RU struck the SBU, which anyone with a brain would have struck on Day 1?
where you continue to ever believe the lies by liars just because they tell you things.
Why do you believe anything pro-Little Russia, even when it makes no bloody sense? To answer your question, because it makes sense.
It's almost impossible to figure out what's going on due to the fog of war, so you have to rely on what makes sense.
Answer to you question: They're using Soviet missiles. (And cheap Iranian "martyr" drones, that have extreme range and good bang for the price but use the same guidance system as the V2 rocket.)
They're using Kalibrs. Surely, one of them can be spared for the SBU? If not, are they intentionally lengthening the war to cause maximum damage?
Just tell me who lied to you. I won't hurt them, I promise.
Considering that you're shilling for the countries that covered up the Katyn Massacre, I believe you when you say you won't hurt anyone.
See you stupid literal faggot, there was never any "Little Russia" and I already showed you fucking Putin himself backpedaling on the issue entirely but you just must be more papist than the pope.
What "countries that covered up the Katyn Massacre", the Warsaw Pact prison is gone and all my homies hate Lubyanka.
Which will be burned and demolished because it doesn't deserve to even be a museum.
Now just tell me who's dispensing the lies to you and I'll leave you alone.
Really don't understand that dude. he's disgustingly ugly, he's not funny, he's pathetically stupid, petty, whiny, and cowardly. who pays for that shit?
He's a reincarnation of Karl Marx. For some reason, people follow the mad writings of that neurotic jew as if they're the Word of God, and I guess the same applies here.
I normally like Tracey but calling the Kerch bridge attack a "terror bombing" is retarded. Trolling the Regime is fine but don't do it as the expense of your own credibility.
How was it NOT a terror attack? It was an attack on civilian infrastructure far away from the war zone. It was done because of the symbolic meaningfulness of the bridge (uniting Russian with Crimea). It was clearly a terror attack, just like the Dugin assassination.
It was carried out with improvised explosives, legit military attacks use real weapons.
It was a legimate military target, as that bridge was supplying the entire Russian army on the southern front. Meanwhile, Russia targeted a pedestrian bridge(and missed), a playground, and some random cars in the street in Kiev. Those had no military objective or use. Does this mean, using your definition, Russia committed a terrorist attack?
Well, they also attacked thermal power plants and electricity relay stations and such. (Not for the first time, and got hit back the same way just today.)
That's not what a "terror attack" is you retard. You're all regurgitating the same drivel, which means you're all imbibing the same propaganda.
Yes it is you dickless dipshit. It was an attack on civilian infrastructure without strategic importance to the war effort that served only to terrorize and demoralize Russians by hitting a symbol of putin’s reunification of crimea and Russia. How about you shut the fuck up so you don’t look any more retarded than you already do, you pathetic intellectual lightweight?
Pretending that there are rules in war is silly. Civilian? Military? All is enemy.
Violent, criminal acts (VBIED attack on a civilian bridge) committed by individuals and/or groups (Ukrainian SBU) inspired by, or associated with, designated foreign terrorist organizations or nations (Ukraine).
Nothing criminal about smashing invading Russians and their bridge. Try again, this time maybe try shoving the boot all the way into your throat.
Oh, didn't realize you're retarded. Did your parents have any normal children?
How is it fucking not? A truck bomb on civilian infrastructure.
Terror attacks are attacks against civilians, not "civilian infrastructure". And it isn't "civilian infrastructure", it's dual use - it's the only route of military supply to the southern front that isn't under Ukrainian fire control. Also, it wasn't a truck bomb, that's just the excuse they're using to conceal the fact that they gave Ukraine ATACMS. Same excuse was used for the Saki airbase bombing.
And civilians were killed… so where’s your argument again?
Up his ass, where he keeps the rest of his pedantic faggotry.
I'd say to get some lube for that circlejerk but you're drooling all over yourselves anyway
See if your 8 brain cells can work out the difference between these sentences.
I’m sorry name how many military personnel were killed or military vehicles destroyed. This was an attack against civilians and civilians infrastructure.
I already responded that, to you in fact.
You people are just as braindead as the average woke cultist. Once you're programmed with a narrative you have no rational faculty at all, you all just mindlessly regurgitate the same drivel over and over.
It’s amazing you can’t name one military personnel or even a military structure you just keep claiming because the military also can use the bridge it’s a military strike. Tell me retard when Russia blew up a park in Kiev was it also a military strike because military personnel have visited the park before?
The original Russian announcement was that "no one was injured".
Just like when their airbase exploded.
Kill yourself faggot
'Terror bombing' would be bombing to instill fear in the population.
This was more of a terrorist bombing. At the very least, they used the same tactics as ISIS.
So, since you still talk about it, will you answerto me and tell me whose lies did you so readily believe about "the SBU office hit" that you decided to publicly repeat without any sort of evidence whatsoever?
I'm not even tell you to stop believe the liars, it's your choice to be stupid, I just need to know the source of your stuff. (It's a bad shit.)
Are you offended that I thought the SBU was hit? Or do you think it's some sort of great gotcha? If it wasn't hit, it underlines my point even more - how on earth they're not even hitting the SBU 9 months in.
No doubt anything is going to be "bad shit" to someone who believes anything that's anti-Russian. I follow a lot of accounts but also take them with a grain of salt, same as the corrupt Western media. You should do the same and familiarize yourself with that grand old concept of the "fog of war".
I'm offended by your guilible naive stupidty where you continue to ever believe the lies by liars just because they tell you things. I don't know why, but you be you.
Answer to you question: They're using Soviet missiles. (And cheap Iranian "martyr" drones, that have extreme range and good bang for the price but use the same guidance system as the V2 rocket.)
Just tell me who lied to you. I won't hurt them, I promise.
This makes little sense though. How does it make anyone 'gullible' to believe reports that the RU struck the SBU, which anyone with a brain would have struck on Day 1?
Why do you believe anything pro-Little Russia, even when it makes no bloody sense? To answer your question, because it makes sense.
It's almost impossible to figure out what's going on due to the fog of war, so you have to rely on what makes sense.
They're using Kalibrs. Surely, one of them can be spared for the SBU? If not, are they intentionally lengthening the war to cause maximum damage?
Considering that you're shilling for the countries that covered up the Katyn Massacre, I believe you when you say you won't hurt anyone.
See you stupid literal faggot, there was never any "Little Russia" and I already showed you fucking Putin himself backpedaling on the issue entirely but you just must be more papist than the pope.
What "countries that covered up the Katyn Massacre", the Warsaw Pact prison is gone and all my homies hate Lubyanka.
Which will be burned and demolished because it doesn't deserve to even be a museum.
Now just tell me who's dispensing the lies to you and I'll leave you alone.
Never? There never was any 'Ukraine'. Little Russia was the name by which it was known. Hell, it's the name of one of the Tchaikovsky symphonies.
I don't give a damn about what Putin thinks. Ukraine is not a real country. A rump Galicia as a buffer with NATO, that is its fate.
The UK and the US, your friends.
You do know I can just ignore you, right?
BTW, Strelkov reportedly just got pushed out a window
Vaush is the quintessential basement dwelling atheist who has NO life outside of you YouTube streaming.
For details see here: https://odysee.com/@ShortFatOtaku:1/vaush-is-unironically-evil:4
Isn't he a suspected pedophile?
Is there a word for an involuntarily celibate pedo? A vaush I guess
Really don't understand that dude. he's disgustingly ugly, he's not funny, he's pathetically stupid, petty, whiny, and cowardly. who pays for that shit?
He's a reincarnation of Karl Marx. For some reason, people follow the mad writings of that neurotic jew as if they're the Word of God, and I guess the same applies here.
Same reason why darksydephil exists