So, since you still talk about it, will you answerto me and tell me whose lies did you so readily believe about "the SBU office hit" that you decided to publicly repeat without any sort of evidence whatsoever?
Are you offended that I thought the SBU was hit? Or do you think it's some sort of great gotcha? If it wasn't hit, it underlines my point even more - how on earth they're not even hitting the SBU 9 months in.
I'm not even tell you to stop believe the liars, it's your choice to be stupid, I just need to know the source of your stuff. (It's a bad shit.)
No doubt anything is going to be "bad shit" to someone who believes anything that's anti-Russian. I follow a lot of accounts but also take them with a grain of salt, same as the corrupt Western media. You should do the same and familiarize yourself with that grand old concept of the "fog of war".
I'm offended by your guilible naive stupidty where you continue to ever believe the lies by liars just because they tell you things. I don't know why, but you be you.
Answer to you question: They're using Soviet missiles. (And cheap Iranian "martyr" drones, that have extreme range and good bang for the price but use the same guidance system as the V2 rocket.)
Just tell me who lied to you. I won't hurt them, I promise.
This makes little sense though. How does it make anyone 'gullible' to believe reports that the RU struck the SBU, which anyone with a brain would have struck on Day 1?
where you continue to ever believe the lies by liars just because they tell you things.
Why do you believe anything pro-Little Russia, even when it makes no bloody sense? To answer your question, because it makes sense.
It's almost impossible to figure out what's going on due to the fog of war, so you have to rely on what makes sense.
Answer to you question: They're using Soviet missiles. (And cheap Iranian "martyr" drones, that have extreme range and good bang for the price but use the same guidance system as the V2 rocket.)
They're using Kalibrs. Surely, one of them can be spared for the SBU? If not, are they intentionally lengthening the war to cause maximum damage?
Just tell me who lied to you. I won't hurt them, I promise.
Considering that you're shilling for the countries that covered up the Katyn Massacre, I believe you when you say you won't hurt anyone.
See you stupid literal faggot, there was never any "Little Russia" and I already showed you fucking Putin himself backpedaling on the issue entirely but you just must be more papist than the pope.
What "countries that covered up the Katyn Massacre", the Warsaw Pact prison is gone and all my homies hate Lubyanka.
Which will be burned and demolished because it doesn't deserve to even be a museum.
Now just tell me who's dispensing the lies to you and I'll leave you alone.
Are you offended that I thought the SBU was hit? Or do you think it's some sort of great gotcha? If it wasn't hit, it underlines my point even more - how on earth they're not even hitting the SBU 9 months in.
No doubt anything is going to be "bad shit" to someone who believes anything that's anti-Russian. I follow a lot of accounts but also take them with a grain of salt, same as the corrupt Western media. You should do the same and familiarize yourself with that grand old concept of the "fog of war".
I'm offended by your guilible naive stupidty where you continue to ever believe the lies by liars just because they tell you things. I don't know why, but you be you.
Answer to you question: They're using Soviet missiles. (And cheap Iranian "martyr" drones, that have extreme range and good bang for the price but use the same guidance system as the V2 rocket.)
Just tell me who lied to you. I won't hurt them, I promise.
This makes little sense though. How does it make anyone 'gullible' to believe reports that the RU struck the SBU, which anyone with a brain would have struck on Day 1?
Why do you believe anything pro-Little Russia, even when it makes no bloody sense? To answer your question, because it makes sense.
It's almost impossible to figure out what's going on due to the fog of war, so you have to rely on what makes sense.
They're using Kalibrs. Surely, one of them can be spared for the SBU? If not, are they intentionally lengthening the war to cause maximum damage?
Considering that you're shilling for the countries that covered up the Katyn Massacre, I believe you when you say you won't hurt anyone.
See you stupid literal faggot, there was never any "Little Russia" and I already showed you fucking Putin himself backpedaling on the issue entirely but you just must be more papist than the pope.
What "countries that covered up the Katyn Massacre", the Warsaw Pact prison is gone and all my homies hate Lubyanka.
Which will be burned and demolished because it doesn't deserve to even be a museum.
Now just tell me who's dispensing the lies to you and I'll leave you alone.
Never? There never was any 'Ukraine'. Little Russia was the name by which it was known. Hell, it's the name of one of the Tchaikovsky symphonies.
I don't give a damn about what Putin thinks. Ukraine is not a real country. A rump Galicia as a buffer with NATO, that is its fate.
The UK and the US, your friends.
You do know I can just ignore you, right?
BTW, Strelkov reportedly just got pushed out a window