I’m sorry name how many military personnel were killed or military vehicles destroyed. This was an attack against civilians and civilians infrastructure.
it isn't "civilian infrastructure", it's dual use - it's the only route of military supply to the southern front that isn't under Ukrainian fire control.
You people are just as braindead as the average woke cultist. Once you're programmed with a narrative you have no rational faculty at all, you all just mindlessly regurgitate the same drivel over and over.
It’s amazing you can’t name one military personnel or even a military structure you just keep claiming because the military also can use the bridge it’s a military strike. Tell me retard when Russia blew up a park in Kiev was it also a military strike because military personnel have visited the park before?
And civilians were killed… so where’s your argument again?
Up his ass, where he keeps the rest of his pedantic faggotry.
I'd say to get some lube for that circlejerk but you're drooling all over yourselves anyway
The original Russian announcement was that "no one was injured".
Just like when their airbase exploded.
See if your 8 brain cells can work out the difference between these sentences.
I’m sorry name how many military personnel were killed or military vehicles destroyed. This was an attack against civilians and civilians infrastructure.
I already responded that, to you in fact.
You people are just as braindead as the average woke cultist. Once you're programmed with a narrative you have no rational faculty at all, you all just mindlessly regurgitate the same drivel over and over.
It’s amazing you can’t name one military personnel or even a military structure you just keep claiming because the military also can use the bridge it’s a military strike. Tell me retard when Russia blew up a park in Kiev was it also a military strike because military personnel have visited the park before?