A thought that's been bouncing around in my head for the last few years is that Christians and their "Christian"-non-practicing offspring are some of the worst enablers of progressivism in the West. They're completely incapable of dealing with cultural rot like violent black criminals, because only Jesus can judge humans, but they're perfectly willing to hold you down while a thug rapes and murders you (figuratively, so far), because forgiveness is required of you. Whatever cultural power they have left is used solely to fuck over the rest of us.
And I know it's not solely parasitism. There's some of that, especially among Protestants (Episcopalians in particular), but I also know practicing Christians who aren't politically active, and still act as patsies for progs in their daily lives. Moreover, this is something that's developed over the last decade or so, and I couldn't tell you where it came from. They weren't always like this. They used to understand that humans still have to rule Earth, and therefore have to enforce laws.
On the other hand, I know a bunch of Bosnian Muslims, and even though their children are more liberal, when it comes to criminals, they still believe in punishment and retribution. They're certainly not actively undermining their own people.
Supposedly, reactionary Neopagans have been onto this for a while, and have been giving Catholics grief about it. I'm starting to sympathize with them. I don't believe that any of them actually believe in Odin or whatever the fuck, but if their solution to uncontrolled violent criminality is to start chopping limbs off, then they can sacrifice goats in a larp to dead gods for all I care, just start chopping.
This mostly stems from the perversion of Jesus into Hippie Jesus. "Like, love your brother, man. Be awesome to one another!"
Except for the fact that my Master did not tell the thief on the cross to just hop down, all was forgiven. And He did not just file civil suits against the money changers for improper use of the Temple. He patiently made a flagellum and the drove them out, literally bankrupting them in the original sense.
And admonished them that it was better to go around in your underclothes than unarmed. And whose eternal form caused John to faint in fear. Totally a laid back hippie, man.
Have felt that progressivism was the natural endgame of at least non orthodox christianity for a while now. The fetishization of victimhood, universalism. Christianity's obsession with guilt and charity towards the 'underprivileged'. Nietzsche's critique had some merit.
Christianity undoubtedly spread some good values as well. Hard to see that now. When I see youtubers like the distributist, I see them as weekend-at-bernies style larpers, holding up the corpse of their religion. I'm a fan of faith, I just don't see how I could have it in...that.
Maybe orthordox christianity is a bit better though?
There is a deep rot that had many roots in some forms of Catholicism
'social justice'. Where did it start? Look it up, it's catholic. Liberation theology? Catholic. There is a deep rot and has been for 80 odd years. The jesuits are entirely fallen, they are beings of the modern world and hold far too much sway over it.
At the same time the traditional catholics are the most sensible, keeping traditions alive from the old church, archiving our heritage
I look at modern churches and I weep, for they seem utterly devoid of the divine. Ugly modern buildings, ugly modern songs, no history, no tradition. That's not to say that these things are all strictly necessary. I do believe that after war, and in new lands, anything including your closet will do. But when you do opt to build something, buildings are made with purpose, and its a reflection of it. It should all be done in glory to God. I really do believe the future of christianity is with a more traditional group that understands this.
Perhaps the orthodox as you say. But I'm unwilling to throw the baby out with the bathwater. They came for Catholicism for a reason. They targeted it and infiltrated it with a foul purpose. It is not an institution we can allow the enemy to hold sway over.
the future of christianity is with a more traditional group that understands this.
100%
Liberation theology is a horrific example of neo-Marxist subversion of Christianity, corrupting the sacred with the profane . . . with demonstrated evil, in fact.
Mass in the vernacular is also a sign of the capitulation of a large chunk of Catholics to neo-Marxist social justice. All that touchy-feely bullshit smuggled in by closet Unitarians and atheist wolves in sheep's clothing. Forgiving your tormentors without attribution to the Trinity ain't Christian. It arises from any number of neuroses. I would bet 90% of the cases of public virtue signalling come not from compassion but from self-aggrandizement, from ego, from demonstrations of fake piety.
Shitty modern church architecture is also a symptom of this trend. No mistake that it mimics ugly Soviet-style "functionality." The same impulse that burns a cathedral erects these monstrosities,
There was a deep rot that had many roots in some forms of Catholicism
'social justice'. Where did it start? Look it up, it's catholic. Liberation theology? Catholic. There is a deep rot and has been for 80 odd years. The jesuits are entirely fallen, they are beings of the modern world and hold far too much sway over it.
You are correct, but it isn't Catholic. It's the opposite. Such reforms and "social justice" started as Protestant movements. Fake Catholics inherited it in an effort to keep people from leaving the faith like 80 years ago. A totally stupid and failure of a move, obviously.
They came for Catholicism for a reason. They targeted it and infiltrated it with a foul purpose. It is not an institution we can allow the enemy to hold sway over.
What you're describing is called being retarded and having subversive leaders and actually believing their perversions of the gospel. It's just neo cons subverting the church. Nothing in the Gospel says Christians have to ignore murderers. Quite the opposite. Not holding a animus and wanting to personally kill them doesn't mean they get a get out of jail free card.
Yes. If you aren't an traditional Catholic, just Christian, your denomination is flawed and unfinished. It's only natural that it leads to flawed mindsets like the parents have.
Seriously, there are crimes that are just not forgivable.
Stealing a bike? Forgivable.
Breaking a family heirloom? Forgivable, if it's an accident.
Murdering your child? Unforgivable.
You see animals fight to the death to protect their children, and yet these fucking limp dicked cucks can't even muster the courage to be angry about their dead son.
They honestly deserved this. Too bad their son didn't.
As Christians we are supposed to forgive but that doesn’t mean they should’ve receive the appropriate punishment whether that be life or death penalty. A very sad story all around.
Can’t say I would but Jesus did forgive those who were torturing and killing him. St Stephen as well. But so soon after the killing is what shocked me after this story. I’ve heard of people forgiving a killer of their loved one many years after it happened but never so quickly. I remember that church shooting in 15 the families said they were praying for the shooter
The average Christian parent is not Jesus and nor should they pretend they are.
The son of God forgived mortal sin from a position of strength. The average Christian is incapable of forgiving from a position of strength because most Christians have no real power in western society. They are brainwashed by globalist elites to be meek and told that is what their religion demands.
I studied at a Christian school and have read the Bible. I have a lot of respect for most Christian teachings just not the very idiotic notion of forgiving violent murderers.
Any religion that truly teaches its members to forgive the murderers of your own children has either been co-opted by globalist bad actors or is actually worthless.
I’m Christian and I can see your point because I’ve often struggled with being humble and meek as well as asserting myself when needed. It’s a fine line for sure. And I have seen a lot of churches being poisoned by what you are talking about. Thankfully mine hasn’t as of yet or I would’ve left.
The son of God forgived mortal sin from a position of strength. The average Christian is incapable of forgiving from a position of strength because most Christians have no real power in western society. They are brainwashed by globalist elites to be meek and told that is what their religion demands.
I don't disagree with your general point, but I am confused about this aspect of positional power.
I thought Christians were spiritually 'given strength' by God. And the Lord's Prayer (I know, more of a creed of desires than instruction) includes "forgive us our sins, as we forgive those who sin against us." Where does cultural context and influence enter?
The other part is Jesus's teachings. I know some verses get played up more than others to play up pacifism, but I guess this is where I need understanding of 'how do I confront evil in current_year.'
The average Christian parent is not Jesus and nor should they pretend they are.
The son of God forgived mortal sin from a position of strength.
This is heresy at best. The average Chrisitan should be striving to be like Jesus and its not an issue of pretend.
Jesus forgave from a position of weakness. His foregoing absolute power is a huge part of his sacrifice. He chose mortal weakness in order to fulfill the covenant. You're no better than the hippie motherfuckers and trying to bend the gospel to your whims.
There is a parable where Jesus says to forgive your brother seventy times seven times, if they ask it. Most people highlight the number of times... not the fact that the first words are "* if your brother comes to you*".
They knew exactly what they were doing and they should either get life or the chair. Being forgiven doesn’t negate the rightful punishment. I’ve heard of forgiveness happening years later. Never this quickly
The modern cucked and corrupted form of Christianity is a perversion of what, I'm pretty sure, Jesus meant. He said "love thy neighbor". "Love" was central to Jesus's teachings. If you love something or someone, you protect and cherish them. If they're hurt, you heal them. You do everything in your power to protect them from being destroyed or murdered.
This modern version of "love" seems to be just as corrupted as modern Christianity, where it espouses we must accept and forgive everyone and everything they do. That's antithetical to absolutism and the very idea of God himself. Even logic abhors this corrupted version of love. It reeks of another institution and philosophy wholly corrupted by globalists, who would undo the foundations of truth itself.
If you love something or someone, you will naturally hate and destroy anything that brings harm to it or them. Wrath and anger can be righteous. This false modern definition of love is also paired with another false modern teaching, that all violence is wrong. Violence can be righteous.
A righteous man doesn't forgive the evil that is desecrating, corrupting, raping, destroying, and killing everything he loves, everything good on this earth, until earth is little more than an emulation of hell. He doesn't forgive evil or tolerate it. A righteous man destroys evil.
I teared up reading this news story. This boy deserved better than this.
I am so sick of these criminals being allowed to rampage freely in society because woke White women constantly browbeat their weak husbands into being submissive pieces of shit.
It is a sign of these diseased times when one becomes too desensitized to these acts of violence that each act becomes just a statistic.
America is at a breaking point, will enough sane people finally speak up and say enough is enough? Or are criminals going to be given carte blanche to rampage indiscriminately?
We need more incarceration of criminals not less. We need to stop all of the woke district attorneys and also stop every politician who sticks up for criminals and not victims.
The only thing all these stories do is make me think that blacks are actually largely worthless and most could be removed from society with no negatives. So thanks media, for making me think the far far far right has a point!
Performative "forgiveness" of nignogs has nothing to do with whiteness or Christianity, and everything to do with the woke mind virus aka liberalism. The real issue here is that these libtards do not want the murder of their son to be a rallying point against the nignogs and their culture of crime. They care more about protecting the nignogs from the consequences of their own crimes, than they care about the death of their son.
Of course leave it to this sub to spew the retarded take that whiteness and Christianity are to blame. So many self-hating rightoids in this sub constantly whining that their side isn't winning while not actually doing anything to fight the good fight themselves.
Trying to shame me for saying nignogs? What would Putin say if he saw you now? I think Putin would call you a dirty nignog lover. I think Putin would say you're everything wrong with the West.
You are a person who claims to be all-in against the degenerate West, yet you consistently act like a bitch reddit mod in trying to enforce left wing social shaming to defend blacks. You lost your mind because I stated the true fact that White people are smarter than black people. and launched into a semantic meltdown because I didn't add "on average", even though every rational person would have already interpreted as such, and not as "the dumbest white is still smarter than the smartest black", which nobody believes. You picked that fight because you were triggered and wanted something to fight about.
Why are you a libtard on race, Antonio? Why do you rush to defend the nignogs and parrot the left wing political talking points on them? If it because you're dark skinned yourself and feel personally attacked? Is it because you've succumbed to left wing talking points and believe them to be correct?
I have never said anything or even been racist. The word Nignog isn't "nigger". As nignog is a word of my own making, I'm free to define it as I please, and in context it does not mean all black people, it means degenerate black criminals.
It should be 100% socially acceptable to shit on nignogs, just like whites call their own trash "white trash" and all races insult white trash and "rednecks", all races ought to be able to insult and name-call blacks who engage in degenerate behavior - nignogs.
What would Putin say if he saw you now? I think Putin would call you a dirty nignog lover. I think Putin would say you're everything wrong with the West.
You think Putin cares about race?
Who cares about what Putin thinks? I care about him giving the regime a bloody nose.
You are a person who claims to be all-in against the degenerate West, yet you consistently act like a bitch reddit mod in trying to enforce left wing social shaming to defend blacks.
If 'nig-nog' just refers to black criminals, why do you here claim that calling out the use of that word is 'defending blacks'?
You lost your mind because I stated the true fact that White people are smarter than black people. and launched into a semantic meltdown because I didn't add "on average",
Yeah, cause it completely alters the meaning of what you said.
Why are you a libtard on race, Antonio?
It seems that you're so extreme on race that you'll label someone who's to the right of 95% of Americans on race as a 'libtard on race'.
If it because you're dark skinned yourself and feel personally attacked?
It's funny that you first claimed I'm an FSB employee, then that I'm Hungarian, and now I'm dark-skinned. You do realize that there are basically no non-white minorities in Hungary, right? Maybe you'll figure out that I'm not actually from Hungary...
in context it does not mean all black people, it means degenerate black criminals.
You never know with you. You also recently labeled someone a 'shitskin'. Some things about you are pretty whacked out, but they're outweighed by the good in my view.
If 'nig-nog' just refers to black criminals, why do you here claim that calling out the use of that word is 'defending blacks'?
The whole scam of calling anyone who criticizes blacks who behave badly racists, is that ANY criticism of blacks, such as rioting/criminal blacks, is racist. This is why blacks in the US and now around the world are immune to criticism even when they do fucked up shit.
It is 100% valid to say the dominant black culture in the US is rotten and degenerate, and the people expressing that culture, who are overwhelmingly black but not always, are also degenerate. "Nigger" is too much of a political third rail to be useful, but other words like "nignog" or "jogger" should be used to name and shame these degenerates.
You don't see me using such words in the context of Barack Obama, or Clarence Thomas, or Larry Elder, or even Kamala Harris. I reserve the right to do so with Maxine Waters, though.
We need to have a culture of mockery of the degenerate blacks in the US. We need to subject them to ridicule and verbal attack. They should be held up and used as an example to everyone else of how to be a loser, and now NOT to live your life. They should be treated with contempt and derision, and given no sympathy or excuses.
If you look at that "top" definition, it only has 110 upvotes and is from 2019. While not limited to criminals, it also narrows the class of blacks it encompasses to blacks behaving in anti-social degenerate ways: "an individual whose daily activity consists of chomping on KFC and driving a Dodge Charger while blasting 6IX9INE out of his ghetto blaster." close enough.
However, the true top result has 3397 upvotes and is from 2006: "This phrase has absolutely no racial dimension, despite appearances. It is a Northern British (e.g. Yorkshire) term referring to a silly person. It does not derive from nigger and should not be considered racist at all."
My point is, it's okay to use epithets in the context of stories about black criminals, which is the context here. It is also okay to use it in cases which may not be fully criminal, but yet still involve an acute rudeness and anti-social behavior reflecting a degenerate culture.
And, quite frankly, this is the internet, I'm anonymous, and I don't want to feel like I'm limited in what I can say. This is where I can cut loose.
You never know with you. You also recently labeled someone a 'shitskin'.
Using "shitskin" was appropriate in the context, which I forget now as that was just some troll I was responding to. I don't think I should have to worry about tiptoeing around my words. I know I'm not racist. I don't need to prove that to anyone else. I'm tired of the severe constraints placed on free speech by libtards. I judge people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin, but it just so happens that there are large cultural groups which exist in the US [ghetto blacks] and in Europe [degen muslims] for which bad culture and bad behavior happens to overlap with their darker skin tone. That doesn't mean ALL blacks or muslims should be presumed to be part of those cultures, obviously. But it does mean that any pejoratives or labels will likely invoke traits common to those groups.
Lawrenceville used to be prosperous and majority white. With the explosion of Atlanta's black population, black people have been migrating out to this and other formerly white-majority suburbs north of the city, having many years ago become the majority in the southern 'burbs. Norcross is another suburb north of Atlanta that comes to mind as having been degraded.
I lived in Norcross and Atlanta for 15 years and left for the coast in '93, at the beginning of the northward migration of Atlanta's black population. A recent visit to old haunts revealed a deteriorated, degraded megalopolis that is getting uglier by the month. The city is a festering hole of wokesters; Chads have been corralled into Buckhead and the traditionally affluent white neighborhoods of Inman Park, North Highland, Druid Hills. Little Five Points, my old neighborhood, is a hippie warren and has been for quite a while. The burbs north and west of the city are still very rich and majority white, and I don't see that changing anytime soon, as that's where the real money in the area lives.
I'd like to hear from anyone living in Atlanta proper about current conditions. I haven't been back since 2017.
That's where I think some Christians have erred. I would liken this action to performative prayer, something the Bible advises against. It's the original virtue signal. 'Look how good I am! I am such a good Christian!'
Exactly. The idea of loudly and publicly forgiving this person comes from a place of pride, to say they are better than him.
It's a problem some Christian denomination have because they focus too heavily on the topic of forgiveness. Forgiveness is important in the Bible because it comes from God forgiving his creations for sinning against him, even killing Him in a mortal form. There is nothing saying we are supposed to be all-forgiving.
A thought that's been bouncing around in my head for the last few years is that Christians and their "Christian"-non-practicing offspring are some of the worst enablers of progressivism in the West. They're completely incapable of dealing with cultural rot like violent black criminals, because only Jesus can judge humans, but they're perfectly willing to hold you down while a thug rapes and murders you (figuratively, so far), because forgiveness is required of you. Whatever cultural power they have left is used solely to fuck over the rest of us.
And I know it's not solely parasitism. There's some of that, especially among Protestants (Episcopalians in particular), but I also know practicing Christians who aren't politically active, and still act as patsies for progs in their daily lives. Moreover, this is something that's developed over the last decade or so, and I couldn't tell you where it came from. They weren't always like this. They used to understand that humans still have to rule Earth, and therefore have to enforce laws.
On the other hand, I know a bunch of Bosnian Muslims, and even though their children are more liberal, when it comes to criminals, they still believe in punishment and retribution. They're certainly not actively undermining their own people.
Supposedly, reactionary Neopagans have been onto this for a while, and have been giving Catholics grief about it. I'm starting to sympathize with them. I don't believe that any of them actually believe in Odin or whatever the fuck, but if their solution to uncontrolled violent criminality is to start chopping limbs off, then they can sacrifice goats in a larp to dead gods for all I care, just start chopping.
This mostly stems from the perversion of Jesus into Hippie Jesus. "Like, love your brother, man. Be awesome to one another!"
Except for the fact that my Master did not tell the thief on the cross to just hop down, all was forgiven. And He did not just file civil suits against the money changers for improper use of the Temple. He patiently made a flagellum and the drove them out, literally bankrupting them in the original sense.
Forgive, but punishment must be meted out.
The same Jesus who advised all his followers to always carry a sword.
And admonished them that it was better to go around in your underclothes than unarmed. And whose eternal form caused John to faint in fear. Totally a laid back hippie, man.
Told them to sell their cloaks, which was the most important thing a Jew could own, if they didn't have a sword.
Have felt that progressivism was the natural endgame of at least non orthodox christianity for a while now. The fetishization of victimhood, universalism. Christianity's obsession with guilt and charity towards the 'underprivileged'. Nietzsche's critique had some merit.
Christianity undoubtedly spread some good values as well. Hard to see that now. When I see youtubers like the distributist, I see them as weekend-at-bernies style larpers, holding up the corpse of their religion. I'm a fan of faith, I just don't see how I could have it in...that.
Maybe orthordox christianity is a bit better though?
There is a deep rot that had many roots in some forms of Catholicism
'social justice'. Where did it start? Look it up, it's catholic. Liberation theology? Catholic. There is a deep rot and has been for 80 odd years. The jesuits are entirely fallen, they are beings of the modern world and hold far too much sway over it.
At the same time the traditional catholics are the most sensible, keeping traditions alive from the old church, archiving our heritage
I look at modern churches and I weep, for they seem utterly devoid of the divine. Ugly modern buildings, ugly modern songs, no history, no tradition. That's not to say that these things are all strictly necessary. I do believe that after war, and in new lands, anything including your closet will do. But when you do opt to build something, buildings are made with purpose, and its a reflection of it. It should all be done in glory to God. I really do believe the future of christianity is with a more traditional group that understands this.
Perhaps the orthodox as you say. But I'm unwilling to throw the baby out with the bathwater. They came for Catholicism for a reason. They targeted it and infiltrated it with a foul purpose. It is not an institution we can allow the enemy to hold sway over.
100%
Liberation theology is a horrific example of neo-Marxist subversion of Christianity, corrupting the sacred with the profane . . . with demonstrated evil, in fact.
Mass in the vernacular is also a sign of the capitulation of a large chunk of Catholics to neo-Marxist social justice. All that touchy-feely bullshit smuggled in by closet Unitarians and atheist wolves in sheep's clothing. Forgiving your tormentors without attribution to the Trinity ain't Christian. It arises from any number of neuroses. I would bet 90% of the cases of public virtue signalling come not from compassion but from self-aggrandizement, from ego, from demonstrations of fake piety.
Shitty modern church architecture is also a symptom of this trend. No mistake that it mimics ugly Soviet-style "functionality." The same impulse that burns a cathedral erects these monstrosities,
You are correct, but it isn't Catholic. It's the opposite. Such reforms and "social justice" started as Protestant movements. Fake Catholics inherited it in an effort to keep people from leaving the faith like 80 years ago. A totally stupid and failure of a move, obviously.
I agree.
What you're describing is called being retarded and having subversive leaders and actually believing their perversions of the gospel. It's just neo cons subverting the church. Nothing in the Gospel says Christians have to ignore murderers. Quite the opposite. Not holding a animus and wanting to personally kill them doesn't mean they get a get out of jail free card.
Yes. If you aren't an traditional Catholic, just Christian, your denomination is flawed and unfinished. It's only natural that it leads to flawed mindsets like the parents have.
If you're a catholic you're doa
Why.jpg
Seriously, there are crimes that are just not forgivable.
Stealing a bike? Forgivable.
Breaking a family heirloom? Forgivable, if it's an accident.
Murdering your child? Unforgivable.
You see animals fight to the death to protect their children, and yet these fucking limp dicked cucks can't even muster the courage to be angry about their dead son.
They honestly deserved this. Too bad their son didn't.
As Christians we are supposed to forgive but that doesn’t mean they should’ve receive the appropriate punishment whether that be life or death penalty. A very sad story all around.
One can forgive minor stuff like your neighbor accidentally knocking over your trash can.
No sane person would forgive the coldblooded murderer of your own child.
If forgiving the murder of your kids is what Christianity is meant to be then Christianity is better off not existing.
Can’t say I would but Jesus did forgive those who were torturing and killing him. St Stephen as well. But so soon after the killing is what shocked me after this story. I’ve heard of people forgiving a killer of their loved one many years after it happened but never so quickly. I remember that church shooting in 15 the families said they were praying for the shooter
The average Christian parent is not Jesus and nor should they pretend they are.
The son of God forgived mortal sin from a position of strength. The average Christian is incapable of forgiving from a position of strength because most Christians have no real power in western society. They are brainwashed by globalist elites to be meek and told that is what their religion demands.
I studied at a Christian school and have read the Bible. I have a lot of respect for most Christian teachings just not the very idiotic notion of forgiving violent murderers.
Any religion that truly teaches its members to forgive the murderers of your own children has either been co-opted by globalist bad actors or is actually worthless.
I’m Christian and I can see your point because I’ve often struggled with being humble and meek as well as asserting myself when needed. It’s a fine line for sure. And I have seen a lot of churches being poisoned by what you are talking about. Thankfully mine hasn’t as of yet or I would’ve left.
I don't disagree with your general point, but I am confused about this aspect of positional power. I thought Christians were spiritually 'given strength' by God. And the Lord's Prayer (I know, more of a creed of desires than instruction) includes "forgive us our sins, as we forgive those who sin against us." Where does cultural context and influence enter?
The other part is Jesus's teachings. I know some verses get played up more than others to play up pacifism, but I guess this is where I need understanding of 'how do I confront evil in current_year.'
Hey Ricky retardo I agree with you in general but
This is heresy at best. The average Chrisitan should be striving to be like Jesus and its not an issue of pretend.
Jesus forgave from a position of weakness. His foregoing absolute power is a huge part of his sacrifice. He chose mortal weakness in order to fulfill the covenant. You're no better than the hippie motherfuckers and trying to bend the gospel to your whims.
My perspective is simple:
I am completely against parents casually forgiving the violent murder of their own child.
Are you saying parents must emulate Jesus and forgive even a heinous murder of their own child in order to be a "true Christian"?
If that is what you are saying, I have no respect for you and your "true Christianity".
Do you really think forgiving the murder of your own child is a good thing because you believe it is what Jesus would do?
I won't be shutting up about how weak men with your type of thinking got us into the current paradigm.
Criminals are not being punished adequately and thus they run completely free in our cities.
You don't stop this complete horror by forgiving the murderers, you stop this by incarcerating them and applying the death penalty.
This cucked interpretation of "Christian forgiveness" will soon become extinct one way or the other.
There is a parable where Jesus says to forgive your brother seventy times seven times, if they ask it. Most people highlight the number of times... not the fact that the first words are "* if your brother comes to you*".
Forgiveness also doesn't mean the government or other powers let's you off Scott free
They knew exactly what they were doing and they should either get life or the chair. Being forgiven doesn’t negate the rightful punishment. I’ve heard of forgiveness happening years later. Never this quickly
The modern cucked and corrupted form of Christianity is a perversion of what, I'm pretty sure, Jesus meant. He said "love thy neighbor". "Love" was central to Jesus's teachings. If you love something or someone, you protect and cherish them. If they're hurt, you heal them. You do everything in your power to protect them from being destroyed or murdered.
This modern version of "love" seems to be just as corrupted as modern Christianity, where it espouses we must accept and forgive everyone and everything they do. That's antithetical to absolutism and the very idea of God himself. Even logic abhors this corrupted version of love. It reeks of another institution and philosophy wholly corrupted by globalists, who would undo the foundations of truth itself.
If you love something or someone, you will naturally hate and destroy anything that brings harm to it or them. Wrath and anger can be righteous. This false modern definition of love is also paired with another false modern teaching, that all violence is wrong. Violence can be righteous.
A righteous man doesn't forgive the evil that is desecrating, corrupting, raping, destroying, and killing everything he loves, everything good on this earth, until earth is little more than an emulation of hell. He doesn't forgive evil or tolerate it. A righteous man destroys evil.
I mean if they're dead, i wouldnt see a reason to keep hating them
Key word IF
I teared up reading this news story. This boy deserved better than this.
I am so sick of these criminals being allowed to rampage freely in society because woke White women constantly browbeat their weak husbands into being submissive pieces of shit.
Yea it disgusts me as well that society is so pro criminal now
Society turns to vigilantism when it loses faith in it's institutions ability or wherewithal to enforce laws and safety.
^ another voice pleading that the nignogs who murdered him be spared.
The only thing the dindus should get is the death penalty. Stop wasting tax money on retards who aren't redeemable.
Crazy conspiracy time:
The parents were progressives who hated their son for not being a broken cuck so they arranged a situation where their son would run into murderers.
I mean just look at that predator jaw. I'd be gloating like a peacock if my crotch spawn turned out to be living gigachad like that.
It is a sign of these diseased times when one becomes too desensitized to these acts of violence that each act becomes just a statistic.
America is at a breaking point, will enough sane people finally speak up and say enough is enough? Or are criminals going to be given carte blanche to rampage indiscriminately?
We need more incarceration of criminals not less. We need to stop all of the woke district attorneys and also stop every politician who sticks up for criminals and not victims.
The only thing all these stories do is make me think that blacks are actually largely worthless and most could be removed from society with no negatives. So thanks media, for making me think the far far far right has a point!
Performative "forgiveness" of nignogs has nothing to do with whiteness or Christianity, and everything to do with the woke mind virus aka liberalism. The real issue here is that these libtards do not want the murder of their son to be a rallying point against the nignogs and their culture of crime. They care more about protecting the nignogs from the consequences of their own crimes, than they care about the death of their son.
Of course leave it to this sub to spew the retarded take that whiteness and Christianity are to blame. So many self-hating rightoids in this sub constantly whining that their side isn't winning while not actually doing anything to fight the good fight themselves.
13/60.
Using that term unironically?
wtf is wrong with you?
I expect this sort of thing from the lowest of the low, not someone who is also occasionally capable of intelligent discourse.
Trying to shame me for saying nignogs? What would Putin say if he saw you now? I think Putin would call you a dirty nignog lover. I think Putin would say you're everything wrong with the West.
You are a person who claims to be all-in against the degenerate West, yet you consistently act like a bitch reddit mod in trying to enforce left wing social shaming to defend blacks. You lost your mind because I stated the true fact that White people are smarter than black people. and launched into a semantic meltdown because I didn't add "on average", even though every rational person would have already interpreted as such, and not as "the dumbest white is still smarter than the smartest black", which nobody believes. You picked that fight because you were triggered and wanted something to fight about.
Why are you a libtard on race, Antonio? Why do you rush to defend the nignogs and parrot the left wing political talking points on them? If it because you're dark skinned yourself and feel personally attacked? Is it because you've succumbed to left wing talking points and believe them to be correct?
I have never said anything or even been racist. The word Nignog isn't "nigger". As nignog is a word of my own making, I'm free to define it as I please, and in context it does not mean all black people, it means degenerate black criminals.
It should be 100% socially acceptable to shit on nignogs, just like whites call their own trash "white trash" and all races insult white trash and "rednecks", all races ought to be able to insult and name-call blacks who engage in degenerate behavior - nignogs.
If 'nig-nog' just refers to black criminals, why do you here claim that calling out the use of that word is 'defending blacks'?
Yeah, cause it completely alters the meaning of what you said.
It seems that you're so extreme on race that you'll label someone who's to the right of 95% of Americans on race as a 'libtard on race'.
It's funny that you first claimed I'm an FSB employee, then that I'm Hungarian, and now I'm dark-skinned. You do realize that there are basically no non-white minorities in Hungary, right? Maybe you'll figure out that I'm not actually from Hungary...
It isn't.
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Nig%20Nog
You never know with you. You also recently labeled someone a 'shitskin'. Some things about you are pretty whacked out, but they're outweighed by the good in my view.
The whole scam of calling anyone who criticizes blacks who behave badly racists, is that ANY criticism of blacks, such as rioting/criminal blacks, is racist. This is why blacks in the US and now around the world are immune to criticism even when they do fucked up shit.
It is 100% valid to say the dominant black culture in the US is rotten and degenerate, and the people expressing that culture, who are overwhelmingly black but not always, are also degenerate. "Nigger" is too much of a political third rail to be useful, but other words like "nignog" or "jogger" should be used to name and shame these degenerates.
You don't see me using such words in the context of Barack Obama, or Clarence Thomas, or Larry Elder, or even Kamala Harris. I reserve the right to do so with Maxine Waters, though.
We need to have a culture of mockery of the degenerate blacks in the US. We need to subject them to ridicule and verbal attack. They should be held up and used as an example to everyone else of how to be a loser, and now NOT to live your life. They should be treated with contempt and derision, and given no sympathy or excuses.
If you look at that "top" definition, it only has 110 upvotes and is from 2019. While not limited to criminals, it also narrows the class of blacks it encompasses to blacks behaving in anti-social degenerate ways: "an individual whose daily activity consists of chomping on KFC and driving a Dodge Charger while blasting 6IX9INE out of his ghetto blaster." close enough.
However, the true top result has 3397 upvotes and is from 2006: "This phrase has absolutely no racial dimension, despite appearances. It is a Northern British (e.g. Yorkshire) term referring to a silly person. It does not derive from nigger and should not be considered racist at all."
My point is, it's okay to use epithets in the context of stories about black criminals, which is the context here. It is also okay to use it in cases which may not be fully criminal, but yet still involve an acute rudeness and anti-social behavior reflecting a degenerate culture.
And, quite frankly, this is the internet, I'm anonymous, and I don't want to feel like I'm limited in what I can say. This is where I can cut loose.
Using "shitskin" was appropriate in the context, which I forget now as that was just some troll I was responding to. I don't think I should have to worry about tiptoeing around my words. I know I'm not racist. I don't need to prove that to anyone else. I'm tired of the severe constraints placed on free speech by libtards. I judge people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin, but it just so happens that there are large cultural groups which exist in the US [ghetto blacks] and in Europe [degen muslims] for which bad culture and bad behavior happens to overlap with their darker skin tone. That doesn't mean ALL blacks or muslims should be presumed to be part of those cultures, obviously. But it does mean that any pejoratives or labels will likely invoke traits common to those groups.
Lawrenceville used to be prosperous and majority white. With the explosion of Atlanta's black population, black people have been migrating out to this and other formerly white-majority suburbs north of the city, having many years ago become the majority in the southern 'burbs. Norcross is another suburb north of Atlanta that comes to mind as having been degraded.
I lived in Norcross and Atlanta for 15 years and left for the coast in '93, at the beginning of the northward migration of Atlanta's black population. A recent visit to old haunts revealed a deteriorated, degraded megalopolis that is getting uglier by the month. The city is a festering hole of wokesters; Chads have been corralled into Buckhead and the traditionally affluent white neighborhoods of Inman Park, North Highland, Druid Hills. Little Five Points, my old neighborhood, is a hippie warren and has been for quite a while. The burbs north and west of the city are still very rich and majority white, and I don't see that changing anytime soon, as that's where the real money in the area lives.
I'd like to hear from anyone living in Atlanta proper about current conditions. I haven't been back since 2017.
Those beliefs of Christianity are really special. Short bus special.
That's where I think some Christians have erred. I would liken this action to performative prayer, something the Bible advises against. It's the original virtue signal. 'Look how good I am! I am such a good Christian!'
Exactly. The idea of loudly and publicly forgiving this person comes from a place of pride, to say they are better than him.
It's a problem some Christian denomination have because they focus too heavily on the topic of forgiveness. Forgiveness is important in the Bible because it comes from God forgiving his creations for sinning against him, even killing Him in a mortal form. There is nothing saying we are supposed to be all-forgiving.