If 'nig-nog' just refers to black criminals, why do you here claim that calling out the use of that word is 'defending blacks'?
The whole scam of calling anyone who criticizes blacks who behave badly racists, is that ANY criticism of blacks, such as rioting/criminal blacks, is racist. This is why blacks in the US and now around the world are immune to criticism even when they do fucked up shit.
It is 100% valid to say the dominant black culture in the US is rotten and degenerate, and the people expressing that culture, who are overwhelmingly black but not always, are also degenerate. "Nigger" is too much of a political third rail to be useful, but other words like "nignog" or "jogger" should be used to name and shame these degenerates.
You don't see me using such words in the context of Barack Obama, or Clarence Thomas, or Larry Elder, or even Kamala Harris. I reserve the right to do so with Maxine Waters, though.
We need to have a culture of mockery of the degenerate blacks in the US. We need to subject them to ridicule and verbal attack. They should be held up and used as an example to everyone else of how to be a loser, and now NOT to live your life. They should be treated with contempt and derision, and given no sympathy or excuses.
If you look at that "top" definition, it only has 110 upvotes and is from 2019. While not limited to criminals, it also narrows the class of blacks it encompasses to blacks behaving in anti-social degenerate ways: "an individual whose daily activity consists of chomping on KFC and driving a Dodge Charger while blasting 6IX9INE out of his ghetto blaster." close enough.
However, the true top result has 3397 upvotes and is from 2006: "This phrase has absolutely no racial dimension, despite appearances. It is a Northern British (e.g. Yorkshire) term referring to a silly person. It does not derive from nigger and should not be considered racist at all."
My point is, it's okay to use epithets in the context of stories about black criminals, which is the context here. It is also okay to use it in cases which may not be fully criminal, but yet still involve an acute rudeness and anti-social behavior reflecting a degenerate culture.
And, quite frankly, this is the internet, I'm anonymous, and I don't want to feel like I'm limited in what I can say. This is where I can cut loose.
You never know with you. You also recently labeled someone a 'shitskin'.
Using "shitskin" was appropriate in the context, which I forget now as that was just some troll I was responding to. I don't think I should have to worry about tiptoeing around my words. I know I'm not racist. I don't need to prove that to anyone else. I'm tired of the severe constraints placed on free speech by libtards. I judge people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin, but it just so happens that there are large cultural groups which exist in the US [ghetto blacks] and in Europe [degen muslims] for which bad culture and bad behavior happens to overlap with their darker skin tone. That doesn't mean ALL blacks or muslims should be presumed to be part of those cultures, obviously. But it does mean that any pejoratives or labels will likely invoke traits common to those groups.
The whole scam of calling anyone who criticizes blacks who behave badly racists, is that ANY criticism of blacks, such as rioting/criminal blacks, is racist. This is why blacks in the US and now around the world are immune to criticism even when they do fucked up shit.
It is 100% valid to say the dominant black culture in the US is rotten and degenerate, and the people expressing that culture, who are overwhelmingly black but not always, are also degenerate. "Nigger" is too much of a political third rail to be useful, but other words like "nignog" or "jogger" should be used to name and shame these degenerates.
You don't see me using such words in the context of Barack Obama, or Clarence Thomas, or Larry Elder, or even Kamala Harris. I reserve the right to do so with Maxine Waters, though.
We need to have a culture of mockery of the degenerate blacks in the US. We need to subject them to ridicule and verbal attack. They should be held up and used as an example to everyone else of how to be a loser, and now NOT to live your life. They should be treated with contempt and derision, and given no sympathy or excuses.
If you look at that "top" definition, it only has 110 upvotes and is from 2019. While not limited to criminals, it also narrows the class of blacks it encompasses to blacks behaving in anti-social degenerate ways: "an individual whose daily activity consists of chomping on KFC and driving a Dodge Charger while blasting 6IX9INE out of his ghetto blaster." close enough.
However, the true top result has 3397 upvotes and is from 2006: "This phrase has absolutely no racial dimension, despite appearances. It is a Northern British (e.g. Yorkshire) term referring to a silly person. It does not derive from nigger and should not be considered racist at all."
My point is, it's okay to use epithets in the context of stories about black criminals, which is the context here. It is also okay to use it in cases which may not be fully criminal, but yet still involve an acute rudeness and anti-social behavior reflecting a degenerate culture.
And, quite frankly, this is the internet, I'm anonymous, and I don't want to feel like I'm limited in what I can say. This is where I can cut loose.
Using "shitskin" was appropriate in the context, which I forget now as that was just some troll I was responding to. I don't think I should have to worry about tiptoeing around my words. I know I'm not racist. I don't need to prove that to anyone else. I'm tired of the severe constraints placed on free speech by libtards. I judge people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin, but it just so happens that there are large cultural groups which exist in the US [ghetto blacks] and in Europe [degen muslims] for which bad culture and bad behavior happens to overlap with their darker skin tone. That doesn't mean ALL blacks or muslims should be presumed to be part of those cultures, obviously. But it does mean that any pejoratives or labels will likely invoke traits common to those groups.