Performative "forgiveness" of nignogs has nothing to do with whiteness or Christianity, and everything to do with the woke mind virus aka liberalism. The real issue here is that these libtards do not want the murder of their son to be a rallying point against the nignogs and their culture of crime. They care more about protecting the nignogs from the consequences of their own crimes, than they care about the death of their son.
Of course leave it to this sub to spew the retarded take that whiteness and Christianity are to blame. So many self-hating rightoids in this sub constantly whining that their side isn't winning while not actually doing anything to fight the good fight themselves.
Trying to shame me for saying nignogs? What would Putin say if he saw you now? I think Putin would call you a dirty nignog lover. I think Putin would say you're everything wrong with the West.
You are a person who claims to be all-in against the degenerate West, yet you consistently act like a bitch reddit mod in trying to enforce left wing social shaming to defend blacks. You lost your mind because I stated the true fact that White people are smarter than black people. and launched into a semantic meltdown because I didn't add "on average", even though every rational person would have already interpreted as such, and not as "the dumbest white is still smarter than the smartest black", which nobody believes. You picked that fight because you were triggered and wanted something to fight about.
Why are you a libtard on race, Antonio? Why do you rush to defend the nignogs and parrot the left wing political talking points on them? If it because you're dark skinned yourself and feel personally attacked? Is it because you've succumbed to left wing talking points and believe them to be correct?
I have never said anything or even been racist. The word Nignog isn't "nigger". As nignog is a word of my own making, I'm free to define it as I please, and in context it does not mean all black people, it means degenerate black criminals.
It should be 100% socially acceptable to shit on nignogs, just like whites call their own trash "white trash" and all races insult white trash and "rednecks", all races ought to be able to insult and name-call blacks who engage in degenerate behavior - nignogs.
What would Putin say if he saw you now? I think Putin would call you a dirty nignog lover. I think Putin would say you're everything wrong with the West.
You think Putin cares about race?
Who cares about what Putin thinks? I care about him giving the regime a bloody nose.
You are a person who claims to be all-in against the degenerate West, yet you consistently act like a bitch reddit mod in trying to enforce left wing social shaming to defend blacks.
If 'nig-nog' just refers to black criminals, why do you here claim that calling out the use of that word is 'defending blacks'?
You lost your mind because I stated the true fact that White people are smarter than black people. and launched into a semantic meltdown because I didn't add "on average",
Yeah, cause it completely alters the meaning of what you said.
Why are you a libtard on race, Antonio?
It seems that you're so extreme on race that you'll label someone who's to the right of 95% of Americans on race as a 'libtard on race'.
If it because you're dark skinned yourself and feel personally attacked?
It's funny that you first claimed I'm an FSB employee, then that I'm Hungarian, and now I'm dark-skinned. You do realize that there are basically no non-white minorities in Hungary, right? Maybe you'll figure out that I'm not actually from Hungary...
in context it does not mean all black people, it means degenerate black criminals.
You never know with you. You also recently labeled someone a 'shitskin'. Some things about you are pretty whacked out, but they're outweighed by the good in my view.
If 'nig-nog' just refers to black criminals, why do you here claim that calling out the use of that word is 'defending blacks'?
The whole scam of calling anyone who criticizes blacks who behave badly racists, is that ANY criticism of blacks, such as rioting/criminal blacks, is racist. This is why blacks in the US and now around the world are immune to criticism even when they do fucked up shit.
It is 100% valid to say the dominant black culture in the US is rotten and degenerate, and the people expressing that culture, who are overwhelmingly black but not always, are also degenerate. "Nigger" is too much of a political third rail to be useful, but other words like "nignog" or "jogger" should be used to name and shame these degenerates.
You don't see me using such words in the context of Barack Obama, or Clarence Thomas, or Larry Elder, or even Kamala Harris. I reserve the right to do so with Maxine Waters, though.
We need to have a culture of mockery of the degenerate blacks in the US. We need to subject them to ridicule and verbal attack. They should be held up and used as an example to everyone else of how to be a loser, and now NOT to live your life. They should be treated with contempt and derision, and given no sympathy or excuses.
If you look at that "top" definition, it only has 110 upvotes and is from 2019. While not limited to criminals, it also narrows the class of blacks it encompasses to blacks behaving in anti-social degenerate ways: "an individual whose daily activity consists of chomping on KFC and driving a Dodge Charger while blasting 6IX9INE out of his ghetto blaster." close enough.
However, the true top result has 3397 upvotes and is from 2006: "This phrase has absolutely no racial dimension, despite appearances. It is a Northern British (e.g. Yorkshire) term referring to a silly person. It does not derive from nigger and should not be considered racist at all."
My point is, it's okay to use epithets in the context of stories about black criminals, which is the context here. It is also okay to use it in cases which may not be fully criminal, but yet still involve an acute rudeness and anti-social behavior reflecting a degenerate culture.
And, quite frankly, this is the internet, I'm anonymous, and I don't want to feel like I'm limited in what I can say. This is where I can cut loose.
You never know with you. You also recently labeled someone a 'shitskin'.
Using "shitskin" was appropriate in the context, which I forget now as that was just some troll I was responding to. I don't think I should have to worry about tiptoeing around my words. I know I'm not racist. I don't need to prove that to anyone else. I'm tired of the severe constraints placed on free speech by libtards. I judge people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin, but it just so happens that there are large cultural groups which exist in the US [ghetto blacks] and in Europe [degen muslims] for which bad culture and bad behavior happens to overlap with their darker skin tone. That doesn't mean ALL blacks or muslims should be presumed to be part of those cultures, obviously. But it does mean that any pejoratives or labels will likely invoke traits common to those groups.
Performative "forgiveness" of nignogs has nothing to do with whiteness or Christianity, and everything to do with the woke mind virus aka liberalism. The real issue here is that these libtards do not want the murder of their son to be a rallying point against the nignogs and their culture of crime. They care more about protecting the nignogs from the consequences of their own crimes, than they care about the death of their son.
Of course leave it to this sub to spew the retarded take that whiteness and Christianity are to blame. So many self-hating rightoids in this sub constantly whining that their side isn't winning while not actually doing anything to fight the good fight themselves.
13/60.
Using that term unironically?
wtf is wrong with you?
I expect this sort of thing from the lowest of the low, not someone who is also occasionally capable of intelligent discourse.
Trying to shame me for saying nignogs? What would Putin say if he saw you now? I think Putin would call you a dirty nignog lover. I think Putin would say you're everything wrong with the West.
You are a person who claims to be all-in against the degenerate West, yet you consistently act like a bitch reddit mod in trying to enforce left wing social shaming to defend blacks. You lost your mind because I stated the true fact that White people are smarter than black people. and launched into a semantic meltdown because I didn't add "on average", even though every rational person would have already interpreted as such, and not as "the dumbest white is still smarter than the smartest black", which nobody believes. You picked that fight because you were triggered and wanted something to fight about.
Why are you a libtard on race, Antonio? Why do you rush to defend the nignogs and parrot the left wing political talking points on them? If it because you're dark skinned yourself and feel personally attacked? Is it because you've succumbed to left wing talking points and believe them to be correct?
I have never said anything or even been racist. The word Nignog isn't "nigger". As nignog is a word of my own making, I'm free to define it as I please, and in context it does not mean all black people, it means degenerate black criminals.
It should be 100% socially acceptable to shit on nignogs, just like whites call their own trash "white trash" and all races insult white trash and "rednecks", all races ought to be able to insult and name-call blacks who engage in degenerate behavior - nignogs.
If 'nig-nog' just refers to black criminals, why do you here claim that calling out the use of that word is 'defending blacks'?
Yeah, cause it completely alters the meaning of what you said.
It seems that you're so extreme on race that you'll label someone who's to the right of 95% of Americans on race as a 'libtard on race'.
It's funny that you first claimed I'm an FSB employee, then that I'm Hungarian, and now I'm dark-skinned. You do realize that there are basically no non-white minorities in Hungary, right? Maybe you'll figure out that I'm not actually from Hungary...
It isn't.
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Nig%20Nog
You never know with you. You also recently labeled someone a 'shitskin'. Some things about you are pretty whacked out, but they're outweighed by the good in my view.
The whole scam of calling anyone who criticizes blacks who behave badly racists, is that ANY criticism of blacks, such as rioting/criminal blacks, is racist. This is why blacks in the US and now around the world are immune to criticism even when they do fucked up shit.
It is 100% valid to say the dominant black culture in the US is rotten and degenerate, and the people expressing that culture, who are overwhelmingly black but not always, are also degenerate. "Nigger" is too much of a political third rail to be useful, but other words like "nignog" or "jogger" should be used to name and shame these degenerates.
You don't see me using such words in the context of Barack Obama, or Clarence Thomas, or Larry Elder, or even Kamala Harris. I reserve the right to do so with Maxine Waters, though.
We need to have a culture of mockery of the degenerate blacks in the US. We need to subject them to ridicule and verbal attack. They should be held up and used as an example to everyone else of how to be a loser, and now NOT to live your life. They should be treated with contempt and derision, and given no sympathy or excuses.
If you look at that "top" definition, it only has 110 upvotes and is from 2019. While not limited to criminals, it also narrows the class of blacks it encompasses to blacks behaving in anti-social degenerate ways: "an individual whose daily activity consists of chomping on KFC and driving a Dodge Charger while blasting 6IX9INE out of his ghetto blaster." close enough.
However, the true top result has 3397 upvotes and is from 2006: "This phrase has absolutely no racial dimension, despite appearances. It is a Northern British (e.g. Yorkshire) term referring to a silly person. It does not derive from nigger and should not be considered racist at all."
My point is, it's okay to use epithets in the context of stories about black criminals, which is the context here. It is also okay to use it in cases which may not be fully criminal, but yet still involve an acute rudeness and anti-social behavior reflecting a degenerate culture.
And, quite frankly, this is the internet, I'm anonymous, and I don't want to feel like I'm limited in what I can say. This is where I can cut loose.
Using "shitskin" was appropriate in the context, which I forget now as that was just some troll I was responding to. I don't think I should have to worry about tiptoeing around my words. I know I'm not racist. I don't need to prove that to anyone else. I'm tired of the severe constraints placed on free speech by libtards. I judge people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin, but it just so happens that there are large cultural groups which exist in the US [ghetto blacks] and in Europe [degen muslims] for which bad culture and bad behavior happens to overlap with their darker skin tone. That doesn't mean ALL blacks or muslims should be presumed to be part of those cultures, obviously. But it does mean that any pejoratives or labels will likely invoke traits common to those groups.