The admin is claiming they won't be using the assignment (which they've apparently been using for years, and which was "taken out of an online teacher resource and has been used in many schools.") anymore, but if so why did they expel the kid?
It's weird, but it sounds like they just wanted to get rid of a "problem family". Like why would administration even care about a particular teacher's lesson plans? And usually this doesn't make news. A parent tells the school or teacher "I'm not comfortable having X do this assignment." and the school says "Ok." and that's it. I get the feeling there's more going on between the parents and staff than they're telling us.
Ironically the removal wouldn't have happened in a public school. They'll gladly keep your kid and subject him to ten times worse.
Even if it was not not ill-intentioned, and the reaction by the parents was too strong, I support the reaction, because its better to err in the side of making teachers afraid to do things like this. They should know that anything that could even remotely be conceived of as grooming will swing the lights and cameras directly on them, with demands to explain themselves.
Why would ANY homework that isn't some kind of water-based science experiment that wouldn't be happening in second grade anyway need to be done in a bathtub?
Proof of yourself reading? How about on a normal-ass chair? On a couch? Front step?
I dunno, maybe have the kid, like, write a report on the book or something?
Nah, then the teacher would actually have to work. Reading the book and comparing it to the reports written by the students is apparently too much to expect from teachers now.
Not only was the assignment strange to say the least but the reaction was so extreme.
What was the point of sending a picture of a child reading in a bathtub?
The response is that they had no ill intentions, but what were the intentions?
That stereotype is fake and gay. Regime media loves to focus on every single instance of child sex abuse by Christians to distract from the fact that, according to a 2004 report by the Department of Education, kids are over 100 times more likely to be abused in a school than a church, and it is highly doubtful things have gotten better.
It is at least there to evoke that memory of all the times we hear in the media of secual abuse of children in the media. True, you gotta mention it but I wish they'd focus also on other cases outside of anything related to Christians(namely Muslims but can't have that now, can we?)
Yet we're supposed to believe that all teachers deserve a raise and they're some sort of sympathetic group of people. Imagine being one of the few truthful and trustworthy teachers and being wrapped up in this bullshit.
Why do you need a picture of the kid, period?
And expel the kid. Not fishy at all. Message is clear. Challenge us even a tiny bit and we'll remove you.
Definitely. I'll be homeschooling mine. Schools nationwide need an overhaul. Public, charter, private, catholic. Perves have gotten into every crevice.
Current day, current trust in teachers, don't ever request pictures of peoples kids especially if you used bathtub in that sentence unless you want an actual lynch mob.
Aside from the "naked kid pics" part, what book or electronic device is compatible with bathtub water? Steam, wet hands, and sweat from the hot water will all damage paper and electronics. Weird 'homework'.
This was only the clarification message after the parents asked wtf was up.
What kind of mental image do you get if I ask you to imagine someone is "in the bathtub reading"? Someone in their pajamas / uniform? Or someone naked in the water?
You don’t get pictures of other peoples kids.
You don’t get pictures of other peoples kids.
You don’t get pictures of other peoples kids.
The admin is claiming they won't be using the assignment (which they've apparently been using for years, and which was "taken out of an online teacher resource and has been used in many schools.") anymore, but if so why did they expel the kid?
It's weird, but it sounds like they just wanted to get rid of a "problem family". Like why would administration even care about a particular teacher's lesson plans? And usually this doesn't make news. A parent tells the school or teacher "I'm not comfortable having X do this assignment." and the school says "Ok." and that's it. I get the feeling there's more going on between the parents and staff than they're telling us.
Ironically the removal wouldn't have happened in a public school. They'll gladly keep your kid and subject him to ten times worse.
Even if it was not not ill-intentioned, and the reaction by the parents was too strong, I support the reaction, because its better to err in the side of making teachers afraid to do things like this. They should know that anything that could even remotely be conceived of as grooming will swing the lights and cameras directly on them, with demands to explain themselves.
I'm guessing there is more to the story. The great thing about private schools is they can kick out anyone they want, which I support.
Why would ANY homework that isn't some kind of water-based science experiment that wouldn't be happening in second grade anyway need to be done in a bathtub?
Proof of yourself reading? How about on a normal-ass chair? On a couch? Front step?
I dunno, maybe have the kid, like, write a report on the book or something?
Nah, then the teacher would actually have to work. Reading the book and comparing it to the reports written by the students is apparently too much to expect from teachers now.
I don't even understand why they'd need a photo for a reading project in the first place. For yearbooks? Those photos should be in-school.
And hell, even in my day there were "back of the book" English teachers, but still.
I suspect bathtubs are an important part of the book's plot.
Not only was the assignment strange to say the least but the reaction was so extreme. What was the point of sending a picture of a child reading in a bathtub? The response is that they had no ill intentions, but what were the intentions?
Groomers in a Christian school and the school covers it up and punishes those who report it. Way to live up to the stereotype.
That stereotype is fake and gay. Regime media loves to focus on every single instance of child sex abuse by Christians to distract from the fact that, according to a 2004 report by the Department of Education, kids are over 100 times more likely to be abused in a school than a church, and it is highly doubtful things have gotten better.
Article
Report
This was a school, not a church.
He put the adjective Christian there for a reason, as if that is the important part that increases the likelyhood of child rape.
It is at least there to evoke that memory of all the times we hear in the media of secual abuse of children in the media. True, you gotta mention it but I wish they'd focus also on other cases outside of anything related to Christians(namely Muslims but can't have that now, can we?)
Yet we're supposed to believe that all teachers deserve a raise and they're some sort of sympathetic group of people. Imagine being one of the few truthful and trustworthy teachers and being wrapped up in this bullshit.
Why do you need a picture of the kid, period? And expel the kid. Not fishy at all. Message is clear. Challenge us even a tiny bit and we'll remove you.
Probably for the best that the kid is out of the system.
Definitely. I'll be homeschooling mine. Schools nationwide need an overhaul. Public, charter, private, catholic. Perves have gotten into every crevice.
Current day, current trust in teachers, don't ever request pictures of peoples kids especially if you used bathtub in that sentence unless you want an actual lynch mob.
Really weird assignment and the reaction to getting called out is very telling.
Groomers gonna Groom. Florida LEO need to keep an eye on "Pastor" Jessie.
The school's reaction is even more suspicious than the assignment itself.
Aside from the "naked kid pics" part, what book or electronic device is compatible with bathtub water? Steam, wet hands, and sweat from the hot water will all damage paper and electronics. Weird 'homework'.
Okay. So the request could be "write a book report". This is a teacher, not your psycho girlfriend.
This was only the clarification message after the parents asked wtf was up.
What kind of mental image do you get if I ask you to imagine someone is "in the bathtub reading"? Someone in their pajamas / uniform? Or someone naked in the water?
I was about to say this. The kid was to be clothed and the bathtub without water.