I don't think you're reading that the way it was intended. Washington Examiner has a very right wing slant, and I think that phrase was intended to describe the woman's bravery in the face of several thugs.
I mean, the headline "Chicago would-be robber dies after woman stands her ground and shoots him" doesn't sound like it's trying to elicit sympathy for the robber.
Running away is also a poor choice against a long ranged projectile weapon.
No it isn't. It's likely to be your best choice.
Without practice, moving targets very difficult to hit, and even a target that is moving directly away from you in a straight line is a target that is rapidly shrinking in size.
If you're breaking into a car, and the owner runs up and pulls a gun on you, running away is your best option because it immediately communicates that you are not a threat, and it gives you the best chance of survival if they don't care to honor your surrender.
Because his gun is already out and you will most likely not pull out yours, aim it, and fire it before he pulls the trigger? Is that not obvious?
And because, presumably, realize you were just looking to go carjacking or stereo-stealing with your buddies, rather than get into the hot mess you've just walked into.
Engaging seems the safest, or else why even carry if its always better to just run?
Because it's not always going to be better, or even possible to run.
The reason this woman didn't get shot by the guy pointing a gun at her is because he didn't expect her to be armed and wasn't planning on going up against any resistance.
The article doesn't say whether the the 13 year old who died was the person who pointed a gun at her, but regardless, this was not criminal who though he was going to get into a gunfight. If it had been someone who was actually prepared for resistance, there's virtually no way she would have gotten a shot off before he shot her.
When she reached for her gun instead of running, she made a bet that this guy was slow, inattentive and unprepared. That bet paid off for her. If she had bet wrong, she would've thrown her life away where running - even to cover to pull out a weapon there, might have saved her.
And who knows, maybe she did run for cover before she pulled her gun. Maybe she was already in some measure of cover - perhaps behind the engine block of another parked car.
He's cool with her running, allowing her to identify him to the police?
What she gonna say? "He was a nigger with typical nigger features just like every other nigger on your mile long list of known niggers?"
Who do you think the police are gonna come after harder? A guy involved in a car theft, or a murderer? Average black IQ may be 85, but if he's even at 90 he isn't looking to murder a random stranger over that.
I'm not even 40 yet, and kids a third my age are commiting the sorts of crimes that I have no problem with them getting fucking shot for. Fuck the "black community."
Yep they deserve no respect until they collectively acknowledge how destructive their race is and has been and any given individual disavows it as thoroughly as possible. I don't even care about historical lynchings at this point, they're a tiny drop in the bucket compared to the disproportionate carnage blacks inflict on the country at large every single year.
"muh emmett till" muh fucking dick emmett till what about the literal 20,000 white women actually raped every year compared to the white on black rape stat that's typically zero any given year? Not even mentioning their dominance over every other form of violent crime and theft.
We were so thoroughly indoctrinated into thinking any form of race-based discrimination towards blacks was a cardinal sin and they are just doing everything in their power to break the spell. I don't think they're going to like the end result.
The latest trend for these mothers seems to be to throw gang signs and praise their criminal sons' actions. That doesn't make for a politically correct article.
I saw a video last week where a guy was in San Francisco and he was showing what some school children had to walk past every day when they got off the bus. It was a homeless encampment with obvious drug use.
As the children exited the bus, almost every black boy threw up his hands and pretended he was shooting guns. And they looked like third or fourth graders lol
It was? Where are you getting this information? Same place that told you that Sarah Everhard didn't exist and that she also deserved to be murdered, as you said?
I know you would enjoy it more if random women just got fucking murdered (though you would claim it's a hoaaaaaax and never happened), but I will explain it to you, okay?
The fucking moment some rando just decides to breach someone else's property, that rando has already proven they don't give a shit about the other person's life. Again, you just don't give a shit and like to fantasize about women being harmed, but why would she just sit around and wait to see if the dindus "just" think stealing her car is okay or if they think raping/torturing/murdering is also okay?
The moment they started shit, they accepted the possibilty of humanity being cleansed of them.
Will you tell me they were just on their way to church now? Like when you said it's more likely that women specifically engineered monkeypox to kill men than... a gay man molesting a child?
The fucking moment some rando just decides to breach someone else's property, that rando has already proven they don't give a shit about the other person's life.
Definitely not true.
Very few robbers are looking to commit murder, or even assault. The problem is that the homeowner is not a mindreader and doesn't know what kind of thief they're they're dealing with.
For instance, the guy my mother caught trying to steal her her grid covers for scrap metal. Dude bailed as soon he was seen.
The fucking moment some rando just decides to breach someone else's property, that rando has already proven they don't give a shit about the other person's life.
The moment they started shit, they accepted the possibility of humanity being cleansed of them.
My legal knowledge might be a bit off, that is not quite true. And thus you will end up in a court of law in multiple nations of europe.
I don't recall a men's march where a convicted murderer spoke.
Not sure you want to start talking about murder statistics, fam. So it's you who should stop projecting. After all, the murder rates show that the vast majority of murders are committed by you.
You mean like it was women who engineered Covid-19?
I scrolled to the bottom of the page just to see what you would have to say here.
Since you had stated that women should be deprived of the right to bear arms, because otherwise they'd surely murder, I knew your take would be very interesting.
It just occurred to me…
Black dude with a gun tries to take your car: give him what he wants, run away!
Neighboring country with nukes tries to annex your territory: fight to the last man, we’ll give you a bunch of weapons, world war 3!
Well yeah. Black guy good, so you can't defy him. Russia bad, so defy him with every breath.
Or, black guy direct threat to self, best not risk it. Russia zero threat to self, risk everything.
I don't think you're reading that the way it was intended. Washington Examiner has a very right wing slant, and I think that phrase was intended to describe the woman's bravery in the face of several thugs.
I mean, the headline "Chicago would-be robber dies after woman stands her ground and shoots him" doesn't sound like it's trying to elicit sympathy for the robber.
No it isn't. It's likely to be your best choice.
Without practice, moving targets very difficult to hit, and even a target that is moving directly away from you in a straight line is a target that is rapidly shrinking in size.
If you're breaking into a car, and the owner runs up and pulls a gun on you, running away is your best option because it immediately communicates that you are not a threat, and it gives you the best chance of survival if they don't care to honor your surrender.
Because his gun is already out and you will most likely not pull out yours, aim it, and fire it before he pulls the trigger? Is that not obvious?
And because, presumably, realize you were just looking to go carjacking or stereo-stealing with your buddies, rather than get into the hot mess you've just walked into.
Because it's not always going to be better, or even possible to run.
The reason this woman didn't get shot by the guy pointing a gun at her is because he didn't expect her to be armed and wasn't planning on going up against any resistance.
The article doesn't say whether the the 13 year old who died was the person who pointed a gun at her, but regardless, this was not criminal who though he was going to get into a gunfight. If it had been someone who was actually prepared for resistance, there's virtually no way she would have gotten a shot off before he shot her.
When she reached for her gun instead of running, she made a bet that this guy was slow, inattentive and unprepared. That bet paid off for her. If she had bet wrong, she would've thrown her life away where running - even to cover to pull out a weapon there, might have saved her.
And who knows, maybe she did run for cover before she pulled her gun. Maybe she was already in some measure of cover - perhaps behind the engine block of another parked car.
What she gonna say? "He was a nigger with typical nigger features just like every other nigger on your mile long list of known niggers?"
Who do you think the police are gonna come after harder? A guy involved in a car theft, or a murderer? Average black IQ may be 85, but if he's even at 90 he isn't looking to murder a random stranger over that.
>Dion Young, 13
He's certainly dying young. * ba-dum-tish *
I'm not even 40 yet, and kids a third my age are commiting the sorts of crimes that I have no problem with them getting fucking shot for. Fuck the "black community."
Yep they deserve no respect until they collectively acknowledge how destructive their race is and has been and any given individual disavows it as thoroughly as possible. I don't even care about historical lynchings at this point, they're a tiny drop in the bucket compared to the disproportionate carnage blacks inflict on the country at large every single year.
"muh emmett till" muh fucking dick emmett till what about the literal 20,000 white women actually raped every year compared to the white on black rape stat that's typically zero any given year? Not even mentioning their dominance over every other form of violent crime and theft.
We were so thoroughly indoctrinated into thinking any form of race-based discrimination towards blacks was a cardinal sin and they are just doing everything in their power to break the spell. I don't think they're going to like the end result.
It's 50,000 to 0 actually
If only all (non-black) women carried we could really take a bite out of crime.
They'll never ask "wait, what lead to a 13 year old to start break into cars".
I'm sure his father can answer that one...
He'll he back any day now.
He died doing what he loved: hood rat shit.
“If [Dion Young] won’t change ya mind//
Baby, baby, baby, baby right on time.”
-“Diane Young”, vampire weekend
What? No sobbing maternal figure telling us he was "a good boy" who "dindu nothin"?
Sloppy reporting
The latest trend for these mothers seems to be to throw gang signs and praise their criminal sons' actions. That doesn't make for a politically correct article.
I saw a video last week where a guy was in San Francisco and he was showing what some school children had to walk past every day when they got off the bus. It was a homeless encampment with obvious drug use.
As the children exited the bus, almost every black boy threw up his hands and pretended he was shooting guns. And they looked like third or fourth graders lol
The journalists usually just lie.
Like with the ''we need our weave!'' dinndo mother, whose speech was characterized as ''calling for peace'' by CNN.
In reality she called for rioters to set White neighbourhoods ablaze.
real?
any examples?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/woman-said-adopted-son-killed-mass-shooting-los-angeles-car-show-flashes-gang-signs-gives-shoutout-crips-video/
And IIRC the mother of the guy who shot the McDonalds employee over cold fries a few days ago said "he did what he had to" or something like that.
Lord have mercy.
Lord have vengeance.
Imagine if white people routinely attempted to carjack black people, and then those black people shot those white people.
Imagine the celebrations you’d see from leftists.
Dun, dun, dun, another one bites the dust.....
My sympathy for these kinds of deaths was gone YEARS ago, play stupid games, win a wooden box.
i wanted video
When a woman acts in "self-defence", it's fine, but when a man does, every woman in the media smears him and all men every way they can.
For the record, I don't think aiming for someone's neck is self-defence. I think it's a little suspicious.
And you've obviously never fired a gun before.
Not going to deny that.
Would they give the same benefit of the doubt if it was one of us?
Remember that it was overwhelmingly women that ripped apart Kyle Rittenhouse and demanded he be given insanely over the top sentencing.
It was? Where are you getting this information? Same place that told you that Sarah Everhard didn't exist and that she also deserved to be murdered, as you said?
I know you would enjoy it more if random women just got fucking murdered (though you would claim it's a hoaaaaaax and never happened), but I will explain it to you, okay?
The fucking moment some rando just decides to breach someone else's property, that rando has already proven they don't give a shit about the other person's life. Again, you just don't give a shit and like to fantasize about women being harmed, but why would she just sit around and wait to see if the dindus "just" think stealing her car is okay or if they think raping/torturing/murdering is also okay?
The moment they started shit, they accepted the possibilty of humanity being cleansed of them.
Will you tell me they were just on their way to church now? Like when you said it's more likely that women specifically engineered monkeypox to kill men than... a gay man molesting a child?
Definitely not true.
Very few robbers are looking to commit murder, or even assault. The problem is that the homeowner is not a mindreader and doesn't know what kind of thief they're they're dealing with.
For instance, the guy my mother caught trying to steal her her grid covers for scrap metal. Dude bailed as soon he was seen.
My legal knowledge might be a bit off, that is not quite true. And thus you will end up in a court of law in multiple nations of europe.
nobody cares about those cuck countries.
Not sure you want to start talking about murder statistics, fam. So it's you who should stop projecting. After all, the murder rates show that the vast majority of murders are committed by you.
And AIDS, right?
You fantasize about how society collapses and you will gleefully look at women suffering. Dude. You have sadistic fantasies.
Are they living next to the Lithuanian masterminds who send Ukranian female assassins disguised as refugees to kill you?
No, I don't. I just have hope that men for once will stand up for themselves and remember what women tried to do to them.
Wang Yanyi and Shi Zhengli. Both missing, presumed dead.
I scrolled to the bottom of the page just to see what you would have to say here.
Since you had stated that women should be deprived of the right to bear arms, because otherwise they'd surely murder, I knew your take would be very interesting.
I still maintain that the world would be safer if they were unable to carry weapons.
The world would be safer for rapists.
At that point you aim at whatever puts them down.