Now, If I was in the Alabama state legislature, I would still vote no on the bill because it is incredibly transphobic and would greatly hurt the trans community.
Circumcision should be banned, but what kind of retard wants to ban that and not child trannies?
There are about four men on the planet who have a viable opinion on the matter. Everybody else doesn't know how the other half lives.
My unit works fine, but I don't know how anybody else's works. The only people who actually know the effects of cutting the turtleneck down are men who had it done in their late twenties or early thirties - anyone else could be conflating the effects of aging or simply imagining the grass on the other side of the fence.
Regardless, it's a one-way decision, so nobody should be making it on behalf of someone else.
Some people take issue with the idea that their parents decided to inflict a cosmetic surgical removal of healthy tissue from their genitals shortly after their birth.
Crazy, I know, that people might object to irreversible surgeries performed on them without their understanding or consent.
I can even empathize with the ones who chose to do it in adulthood, since the pro-circumcision lobby is strong on the cultural front, and no one wants to say "well, if you chop off a chunk of nerve-rich tissue, your penis will become inherently much less sensitive. What did you think, you evolved that thing by accident?"
What did you think, you evolved that thing by accident?"
Your gall bladder says hello.
I'm not disagreeing with your eventual point - that irreversible decisions shouldn't be made without informed consent - but you're not making your strongest argument.
The trans trend is worldwide, at least in the Western Globohomo sphere. Circumcision is primarily done in North America, Australia, Africa, and the Middle-East.
This is a bit old, being from 2013, but circumcision rates have been slowly decreasing. There's really not any correlation in the first place. And the US has had a fairly high circumcision rate since the early 20th century when all of the "medical" reasons for it were popularized.
If you have some more recent data that shows a spike shortly after that date that could correspond with the time delayed spike in mentally ill trannies we're seeing now, then you could be on to something.
Maybe other people with circumcised dicks had a 'worse' operation performed on them than I did, but I have never once thought 'I really wish sex and masturbation felt better' in my entire life as a circumcised individual. Feels pretty great as is, and I do not think my life would be improved if it felt better.
This is further reaffirming my suspicions that having your dick cut to lessen sexual pleasure is forcing some men to find "alternate" forms of pleasure
Seems doubtful.
More likely that men who dedicate lots of thought to their penis are more likely to get annoyed that part of it is missing.
When did everyone get so weepy about circumcision? A collarless Johnson is aesthetically far better than an ugly old dick with a turtleneck. Who cares about its traditional place in Judaism? I'm a circumcised Gentile like millions of other American men. I have also over the years thoroughly examined my psyche and found no circumcision trauma.
And you don't think anyone else should have the choice, when they're old enough to make it, as to which God-given pieces of themselves they want to keep, and which ones to get cut off?
At least if it gets done as an adult, there's anesthetic involved, unlike when they do it to infants.
If those who have been cut are lucky. Scar tissue appearance can vary extensively to the point that some that have been circumcised were accused of having an STD because of the complete lack of uniformity in discolouration.
There are a few adult converts to Judaism who could attest to it, but for an honest opinion, you'd need an adult convert to Judaism who later converted to a faith that doesn't require it, who doesn't have chip on his shoulder about the whole ordeal.
A collarless Johnson is aesthetically far better than an ugly old dick with a turtleneck.
Trust me, your desiccated, scarred weenie is just as much an ugly joke to me as my smooth, moisturized, shiny and flush glans, ribbed-for-her-pleasure foreskin and ultra-sensitive frenulum is to you.
His cereal was part of his ideology too. He was part of a group that believed that food that was too flavorful caused people to sin, so he created bland, wholesome Corn Flakes. If he ever knew about Frosted Flakes, he'd probably have a heart attack. Sylvester Graham's teachings inspired the graham cracker for the same reason. However, the modern ones have been improved with honey and cinnamon.
Circumcision should be banned, but what kind of retard wants to ban that and not child trannies?
But how will Americans live without having their dicks mutilated in accordance with Jewish religious tradition? It's just part of growing up.
The western circle of life. But it's not really a circle because we don't have kids any more. It's more of a line.
Just so you know... The American reason for circumcision comes from John Harvey Kellogg, a Christian.
The shjll is correct here. Protestantism is to blame for America's obsession, not the Jewish mind-control machine that is advertising.
On second thought, they can both swim in the money pit of culpability.
There are already "support groups" for trannies talking about regretting what their well meaning but subversively indoctrinated parents did to them.
Why wouldn't there be for circumcision.
There are about four men on the planet who have a viable opinion on the matter. Everybody else doesn't know how the other half lives.
My unit works fine, but I don't know how anybody else's works. The only people who actually know the effects of cutting the turtleneck down are men who had it done in their late twenties or early thirties - anyone else could be conflating the effects of aging or simply imagining the grass on the other side of the fence.
Regardless, it's a one-way decision, so nobody should be making it on behalf of someone else.
Some people take issue with the idea that their parents decided to inflict a cosmetic surgical removal of healthy tissue from their genitals shortly after their birth.
Crazy, I know, that people might object to irreversible surgeries performed on them without their understanding or consent.
I can even empathize with the ones who chose to do it in adulthood, since the pro-circumcision lobby is strong on the cultural front, and no one wants to say "well, if you chop off a chunk of nerve-rich tissue, your penis will become inherently much less sensitive. What did you think, you evolved that thing by accident?"
Your gall bladder says hello.
I'm not disagreeing with your eventual point - that irreversible decisions shouldn't be made without informed consent - but you're not making your strongest argument.
The trans trend is worldwide, at least in the Western Globohomo sphere. Circumcision is primarily done in North America, Australia, Africa, and the Middle-East.
Pretty much 100% of Jewish and Muslim men, worldwide, are circumcised.
For Christians, it's mostly the US (and some few other areas) for "health" or "don't masturbate" reasons.
Beyond that, some African groups, Filipinos, handful of smaller religions, etc. Very rare in China and non-Muslims in India. etc
>muh health reasons
Apparently, concepts like "soap", "condoms", and "not fucking random vagabonds" are completely foreign to people.
My vagabond sex partners aren't randomly selected. There's a complex mathematical formula.
They probably have to be into vagabondage, don't they you pervo?
But the trans trend is disproportionately pushed by Jews. Checkmate.
This is a bit old, being from 2013, but circumcision rates have been slowly decreasing. There's really not any correlation in the first place. And the US has had a fairly high circumcision rate since the early 20th century when all of the "medical" reasons for it were popularized.
If you have some more recent data that shows a spike shortly after that date that could correspond with the time delayed spike in mentally ill trannies we're seeing now, then you could be on to something.
Maybe other people with circumcised dicks had a 'worse' operation performed on them than I did, but I have never once thought 'I really wish sex and masturbation felt better' in my entire life as a circumcised individual. Feels pretty great as is, and I do not think my life would be improved if it felt better.
... and you didn't consider the fact that they're women, and you're ostensibly not as a possible explanation?
I'm not seeing how you personally having a limp dick has any bearing on what was done to you or anyone else is harmful.
You literally can't even.
Unrelated? You're complaining about it all up and down this thread.
Seems doubtful.
More likely that men who dedicate lots of thought to their penis are more likely to get annoyed that part of it is missing.
More likely that men who dedicate lots of thought to their penis and are unhappy with it get annoyed that part of it is missing.
You don't see any strident pro-circumcision cutfags, because most of them are too busy not hating themselves.
small hats called in
"i'm against circumcision, but this bill is bad for the 5 trannies in alabama so it's bad"
faggot
When did everyone get so weepy about circumcision? A collarless Johnson is aesthetically far better than an ugly old dick with a turtleneck. Who cares about its traditional place in Judaism? I'm a circumcised Gentile like millions of other American men. I have also over the years thoroughly examined my psyche and found no circumcision trauma.
This might be the gayest statement ever uttered in the history of humanity.
Far out! I'm straight!
And yet don't you think you should have been allowed to make that decision for yourself when you were old enough?
Not really.
And you don't think anyone else should have the choice, when they're old enough to make it, as to which God-given pieces of themselves they want to keep, and which ones to get cut off?
At least if it gets done as an adult, there's anesthetic involved, unlike when they do it to infants.
If those who have been cut are lucky. Scar tissue appearance can vary extensively to the point that some that have been circumcised were accused of having an STD because of the complete lack of uniformity in discolouration.
TMI (remember that?)
Like they needed to know to run a worldwide blitz on mutilating girls?
Face it, they just don't care and most men don't have the wherewithal to even question it.
There are a few adult converts to Judaism who could attest to it, but for an honest opinion, you'd need an adult convert to Judaism who later converted to a faith that doesn't require it, who doesn't have chip on his shoulder about the whole ordeal.
You can also break out the garden shears at your own discretion if it's that important to you.
Not important, just an observation. I really don't see what all the fuss is about.
Trust me, your desiccated, scarred weenie is just as much an ugly joke to me as my smooth, moisturized, shiny and flush glans, ribbed-for-her-pleasure foreskin and ultra-sensitive frenulum is to you.
How did you get so hung up on dicks? Your descriptions come from much observation and experience, I'm sure.
Yes, I do know what my own dick looks like. Shocking, I know.
The American circumcision craze comes from a Christian called John Harvey Kellogg. Yes the creator of Kellogg cereal.
His cereal was part of his ideology too. He was part of a group that believed that food that was too flavorful caused people to sin, so he created bland, wholesome Corn Flakes. If he ever knew about Frosted Flakes, he'd probably have a heart attack. Sylvester Graham's teachings inspired the graham cracker for the same reason. However, the modern ones have been improved with honey and cinnamon.
Hahaha I would definitely enjoy seeing him going crazy over it.
Gotta let the jews chop up baby dicks. Anything less would be anti-semitic.
Why is a pussy posting on a sub meant to stop dick mutilations?
We definitely need border control for these people.
Oh no....
Anyway...
Why are you crying?