When did everyone get so weepy about circumcision? A collarless Johnson is aesthetically far better than an ugly old dick with a turtleneck. Who cares about its traditional place in Judaism? I'm a circumcised Gentile like millions of other American men. I have also over the years thoroughly examined my psyche and found no circumcision trauma.
And you don't think anyone else should have the choice, when they're old enough to make it, as to which God-given pieces of themselves they want to keep, and which ones to get cut off?
At least if it gets done as an adult, there's anesthetic involved, unlike when they do it to infants.
If those who have been cut are lucky. Scar tissue appearance can vary extensively to the point that some that have been circumcised were accused of having an STD because of the complete lack of uniformity in discolouration.
There are a few adult converts to Judaism who could attest to it, but for an honest opinion, you'd need an adult convert to Judaism who later converted to a faith that doesn't require it, who doesn't have chip on his shoulder about the whole ordeal.
A collarless Johnson is aesthetically far better than an ugly old dick with a turtleneck.
Trust me, your desiccated, scarred weenie is just as much an ugly joke to me as my smooth, moisturized, shiny and flush glans, ribbed-for-her-pleasure foreskin and ultra-sensitive frenulum is to you.
When did everyone get so weepy about circumcision? A collarless Johnson is aesthetically far better than an ugly old dick with a turtleneck. Who cares about its traditional place in Judaism? I'm a circumcised Gentile like millions of other American men. I have also over the years thoroughly examined my psyche and found no circumcision trauma.
This might be the gayest statement ever uttered in the history of humanity.
Far out! I'm straight!
And yet don't you think you should have been allowed to make that decision for yourself when you were old enough?
Not really.
And you don't think anyone else should have the choice, when they're old enough to make it, as to which God-given pieces of themselves they want to keep, and which ones to get cut off?
At least if it gets done as an adult, there's anesthetic involved, unlike when they do it to infants.
If those who have been cut are lucky. Scar tissue appearance can vary extensively to the point that some that have been circumcised were accused of having an STD because of the complete lack of uniformity in discolouration.
TMI (remember that?)
Like they needed to know to run a worldwide blitz on mutilating girls?
Face it, they just don't care and most men don't have the wherewithal to even question it.
There are a few adult converts to Judaism who could attest to it, but for an honest opinion, you'd need an adult convert to Judaism who later converted to a faith that doesn't require it, who doesn't have chip on his shoulder about the whole ordeal.
You can also break out the garden shears at your own discretion if it's that important to you.
Not important, just an observation. I really don't see what all the fuss is about.
Trust me, your desiccated, scarred weenie is just as much an ugly joke to me as my smooth, moisturized, shiny and flush glans, ribbed-for-her-pleasure foreskin and ultra-sensitive frenulum is to you.
How did you get so hung up on dicks? Your descriptions come from much observation and experience, I'm sure.
Yes, I do know what my own dick looks like. Shocking, I know.