I remember in the early 00s there was a commercial from a Christian group where a man talked about how the Lord brought him out of the gay lifestyle. The commercial was removed due to outrage from the usual crowd.
Not trying to start a theological debate but if they say all this stuff is fluid and someone can be heterosexual and one day just say he/she is gay and be totally accepted then why not the other? Or with trans. If a 5 year old claims to be opposite sex we have to take their word for it but adults who are express regret are not to be believed?
When arguing against the christian right, they are 'Born this way'.
When arguing against liberals who aren't liberal enough everything is 'fluid' and can change from day to day. The fact that this logically implies homosexuality is a choice and that conversion therapy should be possible, is not part of the discussion, because the discussion was never about gays or trannies in the first place.
The goal is not gay rights, or trans rights. The goal is your compliance with whatever they dictate to you, even when they dictate contradictory things. The goal is communism.
The goal is not gay rights, or trans rights. The goal is your compliance with whatever they dictate to you, even when they dictate contradictory things. The goal is communism.
Queer theory is the sexual branch of critical theory, i.e. the application of Marxism to everything, not just economics.
Its like when the BLM founders were caught on mic saying that they're trained Marxists. Its not that they were communists who also believed in "racial equity", but rather critical race theory is Marxism.
The various branches of critical theory are mutually supporting and complement each other in their goal to destroy the nuclear family and create Marxist revolutionaries.
Yes, but destroying the nuclear family is only the means to bring about the instability necessary for revolution.
After their communist revolution, they will execute the true believers, and return to the nuclear family. Under communism.
When arguing against the christian right, they are 'Born this way'.
Except when they conveniently ignore that > 70% of people have the same religious beliefs as their parents. People for all intents and purposes are born to have certain religious beliefs.
Arguing that with some of my shitlib friends and listening them try to tell me how that was somehow different was an early "crack in the dam" back when I would have considered myself a liberal.
According to the PedoLeft, nothing is genetically determined except for homosexuality, the one characteristic that we can be reasonably confident isn't highly genetically heritable.
People go gay because they were sexually abused as children or otherwise traumatized sexually early in life. Any homosexual who is honest with himself will be able to look within and see the cause that made him attracted to the same sex. But now that there's really no social stigma to being gay, most people find adapting is better than trying to rediscover their heterosexuality. Shit, these days you're stunning and brave if you declare your homosexuality in public.
It may be culturally accepted, and nondiscrimination is fine, but promoting homosexuality as a political orientation or as "normal" is just flat out insane and evil.
Toleration is no longer acceptable. You're either all for gay pride parades and public humping, totally in favor of advocating for gay sex in K-12, or you're a "homophobe."
I wouldn't go so far as to say you can't be born gay. We have certain markers like finger proportions and prenatal hormone levels that have some degree of correlation with instances of faggotry.
it's crazy how so many leftist states now strongly encourage pro-groomer "therapy" while banning therapists from providing any care whatsoever that might prevent them from becoming groomer victims.
that's already illegal in multiple groomer states. in those groomer states, any sort of therapy related to homosexuality or "gender identity" is banned unless it's specifically affirming homosexuality or tranny delusions.
years ago they tried to crucify mike pence for signing a law allowing people to get consensual therapy to be straight.
Take a drug addict for example. They try crack, it feels good, and they 'identify' as a drug addict. It's possible for them to replace the craving with a different addiction like exercise or a craft, but they're always considered a drug addict because normal is the default and can't replace another label.
Do you have any memory of being normal? Maybe boring, but nobody has a memory of being normal because it's a lack of something unusual. Like proving a negative, you can't have a memory of something that didn't happen.
With this gay fad, you have people who's Scouts leader jerked them off, it felt good, and so they 'discovered' their sexuality. Even though the ones that are just dopamine addicts could replace that with a normal sex addiction that'll never displace the abnormal.
Put in an abstract way, say normal is 0. You have an abnormal -1 experience where your Scouts leader abused you, can you ever get back to 0 by averaging in new experiences? No, you can have any number of regular encounters, but you'll only approach 0 as in a mathematical limit; you can only be normal again after an infinite number of normal encounters.
...this is why it's so crucial to stop this abuse of children, because damage like that can never be fully healed.
I think they're trying to roll up Western cultural norms into one with their version of "Whiteness." Bland, boring, but also an evil menace that must be eliminated before it ruins everything and we suffer Holocauslavery.
Men who were victimized by homosexual pedophiles frequently end up gay, because that first sexual experience colours their libido for the rest of their lives. They attempt to relive the experience again and again in order to gain control of it - it helps them convince themselves that being raped wasn't bad.
That's why when Milo Yiannopolous talked about being stat-raped as young teen, he characterized it as just part of growing up gay.
The end goal of these “societal” gender types is the complete bastardization and genetic regression of man. They truly want to physically enforce the end of biological sex. They truly want the sick concept of humans turning into degenerate, sex obsessed, disfigured creatures. Since they are degenerates they must bring you to their level. Since they are ugly and miserable they must make you ugly and miserable. People who appease these cretins out of self satisfying altruism are just as miserable. Here’s the reality, there is still no proven biological argument for being gay. The closest people have come is arguing about supplied hormone levels during fetal development. Ironically if this were to be considered “born this way” it would mean that everyone who supports lgbtq is openly acknowledging that abortion is murder. At the end of the day everything about lgbtq is choice based and the only reason it keeps going forward into insanity is because we didn’t cross the line at biological and factual proof. I’ve yet to hear a good argument for why even if someone is “born” with a sexual proclivity we should enable it when it is detrimental to everyone. Gay men created the aids epidemic and have continued to openly spread the disease intentionally, to the point where it is estimated that 1in 5 gay men have HIV. Think of the cost that AIDS has been in research, medical care, government regulations. Yet we didn’t actually address the reason aids was being spread.
The closest people have come is arguing about supplied hormone levels during fetal development. Ironically if this were to be considered “born this way” it would mean that everyone who supports lgbtq is openly acknowledging that abortion is murder.
It would also mean that lgbtq could be treated prenatally.
As a Christian I know that I need to love everyone and that I have my own sin to deal with, but this trend is highly concerning. I am all for live and let live but I think that mentality is coming back to haunt us
Live and let live only works if the other party is working under the same concept. This obviously never actually happens because of the human condition. The simple fact is either we have to separate and disregard or obliterate. History shows all to well what happens when you let a problem fester.
Civilization needs a guiding and unifying vision for the sort of life that citizens will live. When that vision is sabotaged, we risk collapse - and the ones who sabotaged it are the worst sort of monsters. Because they might plunge us into true chaos, and the human cost of such is far greater than even the worst wars.
Toleration of homosexuality was an olive branch intended to preserve some semblance of social harmony. What we got back is that olive branch sharpened into a point and stuck into our collective eye.
The slippery slope may be a logical fallacy in written arguments, but it is absolutely a factor in changing social norms.
I'm finally glad the right has a talking point that stabs directly into the leftist narrative. Calling them groomers for wanting to support genital mutilation is the kind of rhetoric the left uses to call us racists/sexists for supporting meritocracy.
Now it puts them on the defensive - we're using their own tactics against them by basically creating our own kafkatrap where they have to fight from a position of weakness. "You don't support grooming young vulnerable children do you, pedophile?"
We finally have a strong and unique tool we can use to stick it to them and it's incredibly hard for them to fight off.
If they want to put targets on their backs as "the people that pushed others into things they regretted," that's on them. You can't be against that sort of story being shared and not out yourself as a legit groomer.
The Shitpost will run editorials similar to this leading up to the midterms so they can point to them and say they are being "balanced." They are attempting to memory-hole their 4-year campaign of mealymouthed lies printed in their part of the effort to unseat Trump and cover their trail of diarrhea with the thin sawdust of similar opinion pieces.
I remember in the early 00s there was a commercial from a Christian group where a man talked about how the Lord brought him out of the gay lifestyle. The commercial was removed due to outrage from the usual crowd.
Not trying to start a theological debate but if they say all this stuff is fluid and someone can be heterosexual and one day just say he/she is gay and be totally accepted then why not the other? Or with trans. If a 5 year old claims to be opposite sex we have to take their word for it but adults who are express regret are not to be believed?
Very true
When arguing against the christian right, they are 'Born this way'.
When arguing against liberals who aren't liberal enough everything is 'fluid' and can change from day to day. The fact that this logically implies homosexuality is a choice and that conversion therapy should be possible, is not part of the discussion, because the discussion was never about gays or trannies in the first place.
The goal is not gay rights, or trans rights. The goal is your compliance with whatever they dictate to you, even when they dictate contradictory things. The goal is communism.
Top-down, centrally planned, you-will-own-nothing, global communism. Everything else is destabilization or demoralization.
Queer theory is the sexual branch of critical theory, i.e. the application of Marxism to everything, not just economics.
Its like when the BLM founders were caught on mic saying that they're trained Marxists. Its not that they were communists who also believed in "racial equity", but rather critical race theory is Marxism.
The various branches of critical theory are mutually supporting and complement each other in their goal to destroy the nuclear family and create Marxist revolutionaries.
Yes, but destroying the nuclear family is only the means to bring about the instability necessary for revolution.
After their communist revolution, they will execute the true believers, and return to the nuclear family. Under communism.
"THERE ARE FOUR LIGHTS"
Except when they conveniently ignore that > 70% of people have the same religious beliefs as their parents. People for all intents and purposes are born to have certain religious beliefs.
Arguing that with some of my shitlib friends and listening them try to tell me how that was somehow different was an early "crack in the dam" back when I would have considered myself a liberal.
According to the PedoLeft, nothing is genetically determined except for homosexuality, the one characteristic that we can be reasonably confident isn't highly genetically heritable.
Studies have found no gene that causes faggotry, only ones that make it more likely.
You think women should have total control over male sexual satisfaction?
People go gay because they were sexually abused as children or otherwise traumatized sexually early in life. Any homosexual who is honest with himself will be able to look within and see the cause that made him attracted to the same sex. But now that there's really no social stigma to being gay, most people find adapting is better than trying to rediscover their heterosexuality. Shit, these days you're stunning and brave if you declare your homosexuality in public.
It may be culturally accepted, and nondiscrimination is fine, but promoting homosexuality as a political orientation or as "normal" is just flat out insane and evil.
Toleration is no longer acceptable. You're either all for gay pride parades and public humping, totally in favor of advocating for gay sex in K-12, or you're a "homophobe."
I recommend reading Douglas Murray on this issue.
I wouldn't go so far as to say you can't be born gay. We have certain markers like finger proportions and prenatal hormone levels that have some degree of correlation with instances of faggotry.
it's crazy how so many leftist states now strongly encourage pro-groomer "therapy" while banning therapists from providing any care whatsoever that might prevent them from becoming groomer victims.
If it's not already, it will soon be a crime to help someone dig for the causes of his or her homosexuality. Even if someone wants help in that area.
that's already illegal in multiple groomer states. in those groomer states, any sort of therapy related to homosexuality or "gender identity" is banned unless it's specifically affirming homosexuality or tranny delusions.
years ago they tried to crucify mike pence for signing a law allowing people to get consensual therapy to be straight.
It's because normal is not an identity.
Take a drug addict for example. They try crack, it feels good, and they 'identify' as a drug addict. It's possible for them to replace the craving with a different addiction like exercise or a craft, but they're always considered a drug addict because normal is the default and can't replace another label.
Do you have any memory of being normal? Maybe boring, but nobody has a memory of being normal because it's a lack of something unusual. Like proving a negative, you can't have a memory of something that didn't happen.
With this gay fad, you have people who's Scouts leader jerked them off, it felt good, and so they 'discovered' their sexuality. Even though the ones that are just dopamine addicts could replace that with a normal sex addiction that'll never displace the abnormal.
Put in an abstract way, say normal is 0. You have an abnormal -1 experience where your Scouts leader abused you, can you ever get back to 0 by averaging in new experiences? No, you can have any number of regular encounters, but you'll only approach 0 as in a mathematical limit; you can only be normal again after an infinite number of normal encounters.
...this is why it's so crucial to stop this abuse of children, because damage like that can never be fully healed.
I think they're trying to roll up Western cultural norms into one with their version of "Whiteness." Bland, boring, but also an evil menace that must be eliminated before it ruins everything and we suffer Holocauslavery.
Saw a recent study where a supermajority of gay male respondents reported that they lost their virginity between the ages of five and 14.
Age five was not an outlier - it was crisp actually one of the bigger spikes on the entire graph.
Does this mean every gay man was basically raped as a child? Of course not.
Just two thirds of them.
Pics Related
Jesus Christ that's dark.
And its true.
Men who were victimized by homosexual pedophiles frequently end up gay, because that first sexual experience colours their libido for the rest of their lives. They attempt to relive the experience again and again in order to gain control of it - it helps them convince themselves that being raped wasn't bad.
That's why when Milo Yiannopolous talked about being stat-raped as young teen, he characterized it as just part of growing up gay.
Homosexuals reproduce by raping kids.
Are you going to link the study?
The end goal of these “societal” gender types is the complete bastardization and genetic regression of man. They truly want to physically enforce the end of biological sex. They truly want the sick concept of humans turning into degenerate, sex obsessed, disfigured creatures. Since they are degenerates they must bring you to their level. Since they are ugly and miserable they must make you ugly and miserable. People who appease these cretins out of self satisfying altruism are just as miserable. Here’s the reality, there is still no proven biological argument for being gay. The closest people have come is arguing about supplied hormone levels during fetal development. Ironically if this were to be considered “born this way” it would mean that everyone who supports lgbtq is openly acknowledging that abortion is murder. At the end of the day everything about lgbtq is choice based and the only reason it keeps going forward into insanity is because we didn’t cross the line at biological and factual proof. I’ve yet to hear a good argument for why even if someone is “born” with a sexual proclivity we should enable it when it is detrimental to everyone. Gay men created the aids epidemic and have continued to openly spread the disease intentionally, to the point where it is estimated that 1in 5 gay men have HIV. Think of the cost that AIDS has been in research, medical care, government regulations. Yet we didn’t actually address the reason aids was being spread.
It would also mean that lgbtq could be treated prenatally.
As a Christian I know that I need to love everyone and that I have my own sin to deal with, but this trend is highly concerning. I am all for live and let live but I think that mentality is coming back to haunt us
Live and let live only works if the other party is working under the same concept. This obviously never actually happens because of the human condition. The simple fact is either we have to separate and disregard or obliterate. History shows all to well what happens when you let a problem fester.
Civilization needs a guiding and unifying vision for the sort of life that citizens will live. When that vision is sabotaged, we risk collapse - and the ones who sabotaged it are the worst sort of monsters. Because they might plunge us into true chaos, and the human cost of such is far greater than even the worst wars.
Toleration of homosexuality was an olive branch intended to preserve some semblance of social harmony. What we got back is that olive branch sharpened into a point and stuck into our collective eye.
The slippery slope may be a logical fallacy in written arguments, but it is absolutely a factor in changing social norms.
I'm finally glad the right has a talking point that stabs directly into the leftist narrative. Calling them groomers for wanting to support genital mutilation is the kind of rhetoric the left uses to call us racists/sexists for supporting meritocracy.
Now it puts them on the defensive - we're using their own tactics against them by basically creating our own kafkatrap where they have to fight from a position of weakness. "You don't support grooming young vulnerable children do you, pedophile?"
We finally have a strong and unique tool we can use to stick it to them and it's incredibly hard for them to fight off.
Definitely reddit has a groomer problem.
Groomer admins work with people like Ghislaine Maxwell.
And openly hires convicted groomers to be admins : https://archive.ph/tBe0q
If they want to put targets on their backs as "the people that pushed others into things they regretted," that's on them. You can't be against that sort of story being shared and not out yourself as a legit groomer.
The Shitpost will run editorials similar to this leading up to the midterms so they can point to them and say they are being "balanced." They are attempting to memory-hole their 4-year campaign of mealymouthed lies printed in their part of the effort to unseat Trump and cover their trail of diarrhea with the thin sawdust of similar opinion pieces.