You think you want mixed sports but trust me you don't. I know how progressives work and it won't go the way you want it to.
First of all, they'll push 50/50 male/female in all team sports. It won't matter if the men are better than the women, they'll whine and complain and get their way. The quality of the sport will come down immensely and you won't be allowed to say anything. In fact, women will start claiming that the "female influence" in the sport has made it better. You favorite sports will start to suck in comparison but no one will remember what the sport used to be like. If you tried to suggest a male-only team would be better, you will be called an incel.
Individual sports seem like they'll be completely immune from women but they won't be. Women will start to suggest certain rules are inherently patriarchal in nature and start to change the rules of individual sports around in a manner that will benefit women. When this still isn't enough, women will start attacking individual sports themselves suggesting women have always been more communal focused and men more individualistic so individual sports is an inherently oppressive activity toward women. They'll lobby for all individual sports to have "teams" where each team must be 1 man and 1 woman. In this fashion, they'll completely eliminate the concept of individual sports.
By doing this completely to all sports, there just won't be enough trannies to go around and a lot of male players will take on the better looking not so good female athletes in order to try and sleep with them.
How do I know this is what will happen? Because it's what happened to the working world when women were allowed in.
Out of all the BS, this one isn't too bad as it affects all teams equally.
I remember they did the same thing for Le Mans. It used to be drivers started outside their cars on the other side of the road and had to sprint across at the start. After a bunch of incidents with people not wearing their safety belts, that practice was rightfully abandoned.
this. they'll push to eliminate gendered leagues, and then push to make gender quotas. no fucking way they're going to leave it alone and just have the men's league and the tranny league, or the everyone-league-but-everyone-is-male.
it'll be like the female kicker stunt in NCAA football... hamfisting women onto the field. they falsely claimed all the other kickers were ineligible for play because of covid, put a girl in, she was fucking terrible, and then they made up 5 different explanations before falsely claiming it was a squib kick. she didn't even want any of this shit.
Oh man. Gender quotas. I didn't even consider that. If they push DIE into the sports themselves, then every team will need to be comprised of half and half or be ineligible. It's only fair, after all!
exactly... literally all co-ed sports in college were shitfests. they would have retarded rules like "you can't have more guys than girls playing" and "girls scoring counts double" and "girls have to touch the ball passed half-court/half-field"
once those rules come in, you get ringer teams where it's an all-girl team, and every girl on the team won states or whatever in their sport. if it was a normal men vs women game, they would get decimated, but because they have the handicap rules in their favor, it's basically over a 4:1 advantaged handicap for women because they get twice as many players, double the points, and the women on the actual co-ed team are usually dead weight.
this gets even more retarded because we found out this was going on, so we arranged a team of ringer guys who are actually good, and even with the huge advantage, we still fucking destroyed them.
Exactly. The best way to prove someone wrong is to give them exactly what they asked for. I'm all for this! And after women are basically shut out of all sports because they just get absolutely dominated, they'll say that women need a separate space because of patriarchy preventing them from winning.
Rinse. Repeat.
But at least afterwards, we can point to the time they let everyone compete together and say "You already tried this once, and look how it turned out."
There is no mens sports. They are not exclusionary to women. They are, however, merit based and if you can't compete, you get the axe and in high demand sports, a male out performs a female. So yes, women's sports are a protected category.
I've seen the situation you described with a purple belt in her thirties rolling with green belt that looked to be 13 (couldn't have been older than 15 because of the kiddie belt).
Edit: And the surreal thing is that BJJ is probably the one grappling art that depends less on sheer physical power. The performance difference must be even greater in sports like wrestling for example.
In most athletic respects, women are effectively 14 year old boys.
BJJ is a sport that allows for genius, and I know historically the occasional brilliant woman has made her mark against men, but like most sports of this nature, how big and strong you are matters most critically when you make a mistake. If you do make a mistake you either have to be fast enough to prevent an effective punish, or strong enough to eat the loss of position.
Little guys are fast, big guys are strong. Women have neither. And as such will be flattened at their first wrong move. In the lower belts, being nearly perfect is sometimes enough, but by brown belt, basically everyone will be nearly perfect. In a lot of cases by that point in their career, chronic injuries and the art of playing around them have begun to appear, which also counts against women because of their frankly shit durability.
I'm not very talented, but I still slow way down when I roll with them. It really is like being against a 13 year old kid. Only real consideration is that some girls have thin boney forearms that are more difficult to defend your neck against, but some skinny boys are like that too. And if your forearms are that thin, chances are you don't have great grip strength.
Back when I trained, women were not a common sight in most jiujitsu gyms here in Brazil. I started in 98, and stopped training at blue belt around 2002, and I never had female regular in my class. The purple belt I mentioned was the wife of a visiting black belt from são Paulo. Sure there were some women training, there were female divisions in tournaments, but it was still considered odd. I remember the first time I heard about a female figher was Leka Vieira wearing a bikini on the cover of Gracie Magazine (which was kinda disappointing cause she was shaped like SpongeBob). Different times in jiujitsu.
It's still easily 10:1 men to women, and even greater if you count those that take it seriously enough to achieve a coloured belt, but I've rolled with enough women who are built up from playing hockey to know that at white or blue belt, only most heavily conditioned women have a chance against me, a computer geek who's never taken Athletics seriously.
We have women's sports because competing on an even playing field was impossible. Now that the field is level and even, they're still not fucking happy about it.
The world of chess grandmasters is particularly illuminating, so much so that the progressive faggots have to make films about the rare cases where a woman was able to compete as in Queen's Gambit.
Then another 10,000 words trying to disprove someone saying that "man + woman = family" because he rejects that particular facet of humanity that is "understood intuitively by virtually everyone in the world"
If I punch a woman in the face, it doesn't matter how much she provoked me beforehand. It doesn't matter if she hit me first. It doesn't matter if she hit me five, ten fucking times, I'm going to jail for 6 months.
If I punch a man in the face with zero provocation, for no reason whatsoever... Unless my punch broke bones, odds are, fucking nothing is happening to me.
Isn’t it funny how women are “just as strong, just as smart (or smarter) etc etc.” but somehow, according to the very same scholar, men manage to ban women, oppress, and squeeze them out everywhere.
I played for a long time in a mixed sex ice hockey team and tbh didn't notice a sex talent difference. It was full contact as well. Maybe it's more apparent at elite levels but for me sex didn't seem the predominant factor for skill.
I played various sports in my youth. At a young age in parks and rec leagues the best players on your team could either be boys or girls. But once you hit puberty and start playing in high school you notice the changes and abilities in those same people. Hell go to you local high school varsity boys and varsity girls basketball games and you will spot a difference across the board. Not even just a matter of height difference or shooting and jumping, but notice how quickly the girls will rack up fouls compared to the boys.
Suppose they get their way, make all sports open by gender. Then when they want to showcase women (because they still will), what sports will they be showing? Pretty much equestrian (other than racing), and shooting (with light guns). Can't believe they'll be willing to showcase shooting, so I guess it's all horse all the time.
Figure skating? Nope, out of luck, men kill it on the jumping. Maybe gymnastics, if you made the open event use the women's equipment only.
Ultra-distance running is won by women (when it is) mostly because the faster men stick to the more competitive (shorter) events. The records are still men
There are two leagues at top competitions : one open to everyone that is totally dominated by males, and an additional league originally reserved for females, so they also get a shot to help keep girls motivated.
Because although there is varying overlaps in abilities depending on dicipline, the tiny sample of peak human performance will be nearly 100% male.
The only reason why women's sports should stay with biological women is because of the sheer amount of tiddies and booty that we're treated to. Period.
I would support that.
If this is what "progressives" want, mixed then lets go. If there was any referendum on this I would be 100% for it.
A better question is why do we have female esports teams, female math competitions and female chess tournaments?
You think you want mixed sports but trust me you don't. I know how progressives work and it won't go the way you want it to.
First of all, they'll push 50/50 male/female in all team sports. It won't matter if the men are better than the women, they'll whine and complain and get their way. The quality of the sport will come down immensely and you won't be allowed to say anything. In fact, women will start claiming that the "female influence" in the sport has made it better. You favorite sports will start to suck in comparison but no one will remember what the sport used to be like. If you tried to suggest a male-only team would be better, you will be called an incel.
Individual sports seem like they'll be completely immune from women but they won't be. Women will start to suggest certain rules are inherently patriarchal in nature and start to change the rules of individual sports around in a manner that will benefit women. When this still isn't enough, women will start attacking individual sports themselves suggesting women have always been more communal focused and men more individualistic so individual sports is an inherently oppressive activity toward women. They'll lobby for all individual sports to have "teams" where each team must be 1 man and 1 woman. In this fashion, they'll completely eliminate the concept of individual sports.
By doing this completely to all sports, there just won't be enough trannies to go around and a lot of male players will take on the better looking not so good female athletes in order to try and sleep with them.
How do I know this is what will happen? Because it's what happened to the working world when women were allowed in.
You’re mistake is thinking I don’t want the sports world to burn down.
Watching mouthy female athletes get their asses handed to them AND seeing pro sports die a grisly, well-deserved death?
Win/win.
Exactly. Sportsball is for faggots anyways.
Lol I'm betting you're a dough boy
you wish.
Super competitive
Out of all the BS, this one isn't too bad as it affects all teams equally.
I remember they did the same thing for Le Mans. It used to be drivers started outside their cars on the other side of the road and had to sprint across at the start. After a bunch of incidents with people not wearing their safety belts, that practice was rightfully abandoned.
this. they'll push to eliminate gendered leagues, and then push to make gender quotas. no fucking way they're going to leave it alone and just have the men's league and the tranny league, or the everyone-league-but-everyone-is-male.
it'll be like the female kicker stunt in NCAA football... hamfisting women onto the field. they falsely claimed all the other kickers were ineligible for play because of covid, put a girl in, she was fucking terrible, and then they made up 5 different explanations before falsely claiming it was a squib kick. she didn't even want any of this shit.
Oh man. Gender quotas. I didn't even consider that. If they push DIE into the sports themselves, then every team will need to be comprised of half and half or be ineligible. It's only fair, after all!
exactly... literally all co-ed sports in college were shitfests. they would have retarded rules like "you can't have more guys than girls playing" and "girls scoring counts double" and "girls have to touch the ball passed half-court/half-field"
once those rules come in, you get ringer teams where it's an all-girl team, and every girl on the team won states or whatever in their sport. if it was a normal men vs women game, they would get decimated, but because they have the handicap rules in their favor, it's basically over a 4:1 advantaged handicap for women because they get twice as many players, double the points, and the women on the actual co-ed team are usually dead weight.
this gets even more retarded because we found out this was going on, so we arranged a team of ringer guys who are actually good, and even with the huge advantage, we still fucking destroyed them.
fuck these gender zealot douchebags.
Show up at 5am, no women
Exactly. The best way to prove someone wrong is to give them exactly what they asked for. I'm all for this! And after women are basically shut out of all sports because they just get absolutely dominated, they'll say that women need a separate space because of patriarchy preventing them from winning.
Rinse. Repeat.
But at least afterwards, we can point to the time they let everyone compete together and say "You already tried this once, and look how it turned out."
There is no mens sports. They are not exclusionary to women. They are, however, merit based and if you can't compete, you get the axe and in high demand sports, a male out performs a female. So yes, women's sports are a protected category.
I've seen the situation you described with a purple belt in her thirties rolling with green belt that looked to be 13 (couldn't have been older than 15 because of the kiddie belt). Edit: And the surreal thing is that BJJ is probably the one grappling art that depends less on sheer physical power. The performance difference must be even greater in sports like wrestling for example.
https://boysvswomen.com/#/world-record
In most athletic respects, women are effectively 14 year old boys.
BJJ is a sport that allows for genius, and I know historically the occasional brilliant woman has made her mark against men, but like most sports of this nature, how big and strong you are matters most critically when you make a mistake. If you do make a mistake you either have to be fast enough to prevent an effective punish, or strong enough to eat the loss of position.
Little guys are fast, big guys are strong. Women have neither. And as such will be flattened at their first wrong move. In the lower belts, being nearly perfect is sometimes enough, but by brown belt, basically everyone will be nearly perfect. In a lot of cases by that point in their career, chronic injuries and the art of playing around them have begun to appear, which also counts against women because of their frankly shit durability.
I'm not very talented, but I still slow way down when I roll with them. It really is like being against a 13 year old kid. Only real consideration is that some girls have thin boney forearms that are more difficult to defend your neck against, but some skinny boys are like that too. And if your forearms are that thin, chances are you don't have great grip strength.
Back when I trained, women were not a common sight in most jiujitsu gyms here in Brazil. I started in 98, and stopped training at blue belt around 2002, and I never had female regular in my class. The purple belt I mentioned was the wife of a visiting black belt from são Paulo. Sure there were some women training, there were female divisions in tournaments, but it was still considered odd. I remember the first time I heard about a female figher was Leka Vieira wearing a bikini on the cover of Gracie Magazine (which was kinda disappointing cause she was shaped like SpongeBob). Different times in jiujitsu.
It's still easily 10:1 men to women, and even greater if you count those that take it seriously enough to achieve a coloured belt, but I've rolled with enough women who are built up from playing hockey to know that at white or blue belt, only most heavily conditioned women have a chance against me, a computer geek who's never taken Athletics seriously.
We have women's sports because competing on an even playing field was impossible. Now that the field is level and even, they're still not fucking happy about it.
We can all agree that women can't compete with men physically. Why are we entertaining the fantasy that they can compete with men mentally?
The world of chess grandmasters is particularly illuminating, so much so that the progressive faggots have to make films about the rare cases where a woman was able to compete as in Queen's Gambit.
James Lindsay writing 10,000 exasperated words definitively proving that 2 + 2 always = 4 and can never equal anything else.
Then another 10,000 words trying to disprove someone saying that "man + woman = family" because he rejects that particular facet of humanity that is "understood intuitively by virtually everyone in the world"
Unless he is gay, and maybe even if he is, he may still come around.
If women were as strong as men, punching them in the face wouldn't be a big deal.
It's not though. Just remember that the thumb goes on the outside.
It is, though.
If I punch a woman in the face, it doesn't matter how much she provoked me beforehand. It doesn't matter if she hit me first. It doesn't matter if she hit me five, ten fucking times, I'm going to jail for 6 months.
If I punch a man in the face with zero provocation, for no reason whatsoever... Unless my punch broke bones, odds are, fucking nothing is happening to me.
Isn’t it funny how women are “just as strong, just as smart (or smarter) etc etc.” but somehow, according to the very same scholar, men manage to ban women, oppress, and squeeze them out everywhere.
women also dont volunteer to go to war
And when women do somehow go to war they weasel out of active combat duties by getting pregnant.
It's Darvo, they're banning men, so they accuse you of banning women.
Ok cuck
I played various sports in my youth. At a young age in parks and rec leagues the best players on your team could either be boys or girls. But once you hit puberty and start playing in high school you notice the changes and abilities in those same people. Hell go to you local high school varsity boys and varsity girls basketball games and you will spot a difference across the board. Not even just a matter of height difference or shooting and jumping, but notice how quickly the girls will rack up fouls compared to the boys.
Remember when a U15 boys soccer team beat the Olympic women's soccer team? Not just beaten, but soundly blown out.
Username checks out.
lol
https://boysvswomen.com
You absolutely retarded dunce
Ok but men weren't the ones demanding women's sports.
Except for maybe foxy boxing or mud wrestling.
Suppose they get their way, make all sports open by gender. Then when they want to showcase women (because they still will), what sports will they be showing? Pretty much equestrian (other than racing), and shooting (with light guns). Can't believe they'll be willing to showcase shooting, so I guess it's all horse all the time.
Figure skating? Nope, out of luck, men kill it on the jumping. Maybe gymnastics, if you made the open event use the women's equipment only.
Ultra-distance running is won by women (when it is) mostly because the faster men stick to the more competitive (shorter) events. The records are still men
Bwahahaha. Who is stupid enough to believe that?
There are two leagues at top competitions : one open to everyone that is totally dominated by males, and an additional league originally reserved for females, so they also get a shot to help keep girls motivated.
Because although there is varying overlaps in abilities depending on dicipline, the tiny sample of peak human performance will be nearly 100% male.
The only reason why women's sports should stay with biological women is because of the sheer amount of tiddies and booty that we're treated to. Period.
"If she dies, she dies."
https://c.tenor.com/jsw4msjs6OkAAAAC/rocky.gif
Communication error: They got so sick of women getting millions of views on youtube for unboxing videos, that they wanted to see the reverse.