Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

36
So about that Hindenburg... (threadreaderapp.com)
posted 4 years ago by acp_k2win 4 years ago by acp_k2win +36 / -0
27 comments share
27 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (27)
sorted by:
▲ 27 ▼
– Steampunk_Moustache 27 points 4 years ago +27 / -0

This was quite the fascinating read.

I knew most of this stuff already, but somehow I never put it all together. Now I'm kicking myself for not seeing it.

Globally ditching an entire class of aircraft, overnight, because of one crash, that more than half of the people on board survived? God, just that sentence alone gets the noggin joggin', and yet I never drew the oil oligarch connection.

God damn.

This deserves to be covered by someone with reach.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

It's a bit odd they abandoned it back then. Today, I don't think it would be competitive with jet travel. You're on it for so long, it's got the labor of nights in a hotel and many meals. Maybe it would work for people to enjoy the journey like a cruise ship?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Assassin47 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

People are trying to bring it back in the form of hybrid airships. In fact one of the Google founders had a hanger where he was working on one. Lockheed Martin created the technology demonstrator everyone is else copying.

https://www.straightlineaviation.com/hybrid-technology

That is applied towards cargo, but there are other companies aiming to operating cruise ships. I think cruising is the most likely market, while cargo will be delivered by SpaceX's Starship.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I would do an air cruise. Seems dope. Small boat tho. 20k a head and I get to check out the machinery. Sold

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– GhostBond 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Globally ditching an entire class of aircraft, overnight, because of one crash, that more than half of the people on board survived? God, just that sentence alone gets the noggin joggin', and yet I never drew the oil oligarch connection.

I don't think that's actually accurate. I watched something about the US developing airships to use as a sort of aircraft carrier in the sky, they put several into service, basically bad weather would always crash them.

edit: ran across the video on it -
https://youtu.be/VNOusZLO7y4

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 24 ▼
– Erithal 24 points 4 years ago +24 / -0

I mean. Once you start wondering who the bad guys were in world war 2, why not recognize the great Nazi airship tragedy as also victimizing humanity?

Go full tin foil giga brain with me:

The same forces of global capital that would have serious issues with a nationalist seizure of finance breaking control of fiat currency and the fractional reserve model of banking, would have real issues with an emergent system of cheap rigid air transport fueled and floated with hydrogen obtained via electrolysis. You can commodify and control petroleum so much better than water, after all.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Cazarosta 14 points 4 years ago +14 / -0

Oil is the the gold standard of the modern day. Perhaps the oil oligopolies realized that back then.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Arkana 13 points 4 years ago +13 / -0

I remember reading this thread when it was originally posted, it's pretty good information.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– deleted 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

Good shit!

I wonder if we can get the climate cultists onboard with bringing back airships. Given how efficient they are, it should be a no brainer for them.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– acp_k2win [S] 12 points 4 years ago +12 / -0

environmentalists don't really care about the environment, if they did they would be the strongest proponents of nuclear power

they use environmentalism as a thin cover story to disguise their misanthropy and marxism

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Oppressinator 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Solar and wind power are weak platitudes whose failures prop up the oil industry by proxy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

The ones leading the cult, sure. The cultists themselves are believers though. Seeing actual solutions to the greenhouse gas problem get rejected can be a redpill.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– rabdargab 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

The cultists themselves are devoid of any critical thinking skills

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I don't think they'd stop you. It has been proposed, but to my knowledge no more than prototypes have ever come of it. I think they didn't know about helium at the time of the Hindenburg, or at least didn't know how to get it. But I don't think they propose to use hydrogen today. Not sure how using helium affects the efficiency.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

All I know about helium is CA has banned helium balloons at parties, claiming we are running out of it. The climate cultists would likely be more on board with Hydrogen.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– LinkR 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

Didn't know it crossed the Atlantic. God, that must have taken fucking forever.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– cartoonericroberts 20 points 4 years ago +20 / -0

It would take a couple days, but they were competing with steam ships which would take twice that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– Hogbutcher 19 points 4 years ago +19 / -0

Imagine the experience. Floating in silence 500 feet above the water in total luxury. I’m sure the time passed without notice. You were traveling 3x as fast as the 2nd option of the day. They probably felt like they were on the Concord.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Knife-TotingRat 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

But a lot more comfortable and classy, with room to move about.

Modern airplanes might be faster, but they sure resemble the way cattle are transported.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– LauriThorne 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Sure, but if they brought it back the luxury liners would still be priced so most people can't afford them. You'd have the upper class on the airship, and the rest of us on the same old plane.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SarcasticRidley 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

In economy class yes (I'm looking at you, Spirit Airlines, with your seats that are so close to each other that I couldn't even keep my knees in front of me).

On bigger planes it's not as bad.

First class is always the best, but it's always too expensive.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

The Concord was faster, and luxurious, but only rich people could afford it. People didn't travel will nilly across continents back then, and poor people didn't travel at all.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ArtemisFoul 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

It wasn't too bad apparently - less than 2 days going from the US to Europe, a bit over 2 days going the other way.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– ailurus 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

Is the article going to talk about how part of the cause for the fire was the US refusing to sell Helium, thus forcing them to use Hydrogen?

<reads article>

Oh, good, it does. Along with a whole bunch of other stuff. Very interesting.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy