This was fun to read. I like how there are some people that are angry that the woman sued. The vegan cunt almost killed her and they are defending her.
The woman that almost died was concerned if this makes her look like the bad guy in all of this. That is such a woman thing.
The very same Redditard leftoid Karens who bitched about her suing would 100% support someone being physically assaulted or imprisoned for "misgendering", "deadnaming" or having ever said the word nigger.
Some are filthy troons, some are the "good girls" who want to pretend they are heroes... also, enjoy the glowup you get when the "gal" next to you has a five o'clock shadow, moobs and a chocker on top of an adam's apple.
One of the suspected causes of high domestic abuse rates for lesbians is straight extremist bitches marrying each other and having an unsatisfactory relationship as a result.
Thing is this would be the very same argument these idiots have been attempting for a while now regarding how they know their own bodies better than anyone, including medical doctors. This is of course partially true but never put forward in the facts-orientated way that would make sense if explained properly. Wokesters don't know basic biology, or at least in many cases just choose to not only outright ignore it but also state falsehoods towards it. However they will know their own medical history better than a random doctor will before getting any of the facts on the matter. They will know their own allergies [hopefully], they will know how past treatments may have caused side-effects despite assurances any side-effects might be "minor" or "unlikely".
The problem is wokesters don't really care that much about the argument being valid as a whole, they just use it when it's useful to them and discard it when it loses use.
Not that pointing out this hypocrisy or stupidity will cause any of them to actually thing on the matter.
I always find it bewildering how completely without a solid definition the term "vegan" is for most that use the term.
For some it's: No animal products whatsoever.
And yet I still see many "vegans" who will eat eggs. Or fish.
For others it's: Only produce given freely/not taken without consent.
Ironically this often means certain sex acts are considered vegan [swallowing], while glossing over the fact that consent is quite literally a human social construct because animals due to being not human cannot engage in human concepts as humans do through simply existing. It still requires anything non-human to adhere to human understanding and definitions.
Then there are the groups that are wearing horse blinders and hyperfocus in on how the product is made because if they for one moment look to the sides their entire façade comes crashing down because suddenly the reality about those "doesn't not harm animals" products comes out as being the result of deforestation [palm oil and orangutans for example], displacement, and general disturbances towards the animals many "vegans" claim to care about.
They don't of course, it's the same rhetoric used by [Western] feminists about how important various topics are to women [in the West] because if they were to actually attempt to apply their arguments on a global scale 3 main issues would be encountered.
They'd have to actually do something. Better to just post on social media and complain until a company does the work for them.
They'd have to learn about and understand the actual differences between where they are and where they are saying things need changed [political, geographical, environmental, etc].
And the big one that deserves a topic all to itself despite being a subsection of the second point regarding politics and related matters: Islam.
The term "Islam is right about women" works specifically because it ends up creating a catch 22 for any wokester that looks at it. So of course they ignore it. They ignore how slaves are very much still a thing in parts of Africa and the UAE. They ignore how women in many countries have no rights. They ignore how many people in general are just treated as little more than expendable because it's their "culture".
Regarding the hypocrisy of vegans, an older tv show from 2002 with Dominic Purcell named 'John Doe' had a /thathappened style takedown of such a character and while fictitious is still quite cathartic. Moreso when you realize the annoying hippy in the episode would later play Kavanagh in Stargate Atlantis, yet again another annoying character - albeit one who wasn't always wrong.
This but with the caveat that while I've only seen 'vegans' be extremely ideologically militant, in my experience 'vegetarians' -- outside of foregoing meat -- have a very wide spectrum, with some even being OK with fish.
Ironically this often means certain sex acts are considered vegan [swallowing], while glossing over the fact that consent is quite literally a human social construct because animals due to being not human cannot engage in human concepts as humans do through simply existing. It still requires anything non-human to adhere to human understanding and definitions.
I would hope in the case of sex acts the fact that consent is a human construct would be a moot point.
“I start eating and everything tastes a little off. At this point, she does a “‘Ta da’ and smugly told us ‘I bet it tastes exactly like meat,’”
This is hilarious. Even vegans subconsciously admit that meat is superior. They crave it and try to mimic it with their subpar creations. If they thought soy was actually better, they wouldn't be trying to turn it into something else.
Vegans need supplements to live, those come from butchering animals.
If they cared about animal welfare so much, how about they do some real research into butchering and animal handling so that they can properly request the government restrict major meat manufacturers into more humane methods.
Oh and in regards to muh co2, global warming is not a threat and growing allot of the shit they eat is harder on the environment if grown on the ground due to heavy pesticide use that may not biodegrade.
I like how they think plants just come out of the ground and are available to us with no effort. They don't seem to care about the countless number of small animals that were killed to prevent them from getting into the crops.
They don't seem to care about the countless number of small animals that were killed to prevent them from getting into the crops.
Why should they? There's no contradiction in having the same moral consideration line as the rest of us with dogs on one side and locusts on the other, but placing cattle on the dog side and not the locust side.
There is a contradiction. Their whole reason for going vegan is to stop animals from being harmed by eating plants, supposedly. I don't recall vegans ever saying "not this animal, just that one".
In fact I saw a vegan earlier say that killing any animal for food is murder. It should logically follow that killing an animal to protect your food is still murder.
Vegans need supplements to live, those come from butchering animals.
One major fucking cope I read about this is about B vitamins. You get them primarily from meat, so much so that B12 is a major concern for vegans. The mythos about how a vegan diet can be so deficient in something important like that is that humans would naturally get their B12 from bacteria in the dirt that used to present on vegetables before modern sanitation caused plants to be so consistently clean for consumption.
So, in their head, this makes their diet viable, they're just "supplementing" nutrients they're missing from a diet that naturally included fucking dirt.
Sausages and meatballs are the best case scenario for faux meat and they can't pull it off. I tried some Impossible meatballs and you can tell they are made out of pea protein because they taste like peas. Soy shit will usually just taste like the spices with no meat flavor at all. There's a lot of actually good vegan food but this fake meat shit ain't it.
And then you have leafcutter ants that have been farming fungi for at least 45 million years as a food source, something humans only started doing properly in the late 1960s with quorn. It's still designed in a way that it resembles meat but it's an alternative to soy beans.
It's not the diet, it's the niche factor that attracts these people. They do it with everything, find it's horrible to experience and makes them miserable, are too much of a vain cunt to stop doing it because they would go back to being normal, and decide everyone must follow their example or die.
If you have a deadly serious allergy to soy products, and you live with a fucking vegan, call me crazy, but they kind of NEED TO KNOW that.
Still, she absolutely should sue rather than pay for their stunt, and because of that, she has to press charges, or any defense for the lawsuit will say 'If it's her fault, why aren't you pressing charges against her?'
What is it with vegans and fake meat trying to claim it tastes just as good as real meat? There are so many dishes you can make with actual vegan food without desperately clinging to the "soy chicken" route.
It's because they crave meat and know deep down that it is the superior source of nutrition and flavor. Attempting to mimic it with their soy products is a failed attempt to placate their hunger and keep them from abandoning the diet altogether.
Gateway drug for getting non-vegans into the lifestyle. If they can dupe the normal omnivores into eating soy/plants on a regular basis and treating it like it's meat then they can reduce reliance on farmed meats and SaVe ThE eNvIrOnMeNt. Never mind that the farming that produces the soy products pumps more toxins into the environment via weed killers and kills tons of critters that nest in the fields during the growing season once harvest happens.
Because if they ever make it work, it's a huge potential market. If you're the only company in the world who can use the "I Can't Believe It's Not Steak" trademark and everyone knows it lets them get everything they like about eating steak as often as they like, you are going to be a very rich person.
This was fun to read. I like how there are some people that are angry that the woman sued. The vegan cunt almost killed her and they are defending her. The woman that almost died was concerned if this makes her look like the bad guy in all of this. That is such a woman thing.
The very same Redditard leftoid Karens who bitched about her suing would 100% support someone being physically assaulted or imprisoned for "misgendering", "deadnaming" or having ever said the word nigger.
Some are filthy troons, some are the "good girls" who want to pretend they are heroes... also, enjoy the glowup you get when the "gal" next to you has a five o'clock shadow, moobs and a chocker on top of an adam's apple.
Trans fetishists aren't lesbians.
One of the suspected causes of high domestic abuse rates for lesbians is straight extremist bitches marrying each other and having an unsatisfactory relationship as a result.
It's almost like it's important that people know what's in what they eat...or inject
Thing is this would be the very same argument these idiots have been attempting for a while now regarding how they know their own bodies better than anyone, including medical doctors. This is of course partially true but never put forward in the facts-orientated way that would make sense if explained properly. Wokesters don't know basic biology, or at least in many cases just choose to not only outright ignore it but also state falsehoods towards it. However they will know their own medical history better than a random doctor will before getting any of the facts on the matter. They will know their own allergies [hopefully], they will know how past treatments may have caused side-effects despite assurances any side-effects might be "minor" or "unlikely".
The problem is wokesters don't really care that much about the argument being valid as a whole, they just use it when it's useful to them and discard it when it loses use.
Not that pointing out this hypocrisy or stupidity will cause any of them to actually thing on the matter.
Did she ask the chick to pay for the damages? it could be a dick move, if not.
Vegans are scum and should be persecuted.
I always find it bewildering how completely without a solid definition the term "vegan" is for most that use the term.
For some it's: No animal products whatsoever.
And yet I still see many "vegans" who will eat eggs. Or fish.
For others it's: Only produce given freely/not taken without consent.
Ironically this often means certain sex acts are considered vegan [swallowing], while glossing over the fact that consent is quite literally a human social construct because animals due to being not human cannot engage in human concepts as humans do through simply existing. It still requires anything non-human to adhere to human understanding and definitions.
Then there are the groups that are wearing horse blinders and hyperfocus in on how the product is made because if they for one moment look to the sides their entire façade comes crashing down because suddenly the reality about those "doesn't not harm animals" products comes out as being the result of deforestation [palm oil and orangutans for example], displacement, and general disturbances towards the animals many "vegans" claim to care about.
They don't of course, it's the same rhetoric used by [Western] feminists about how important various topics are to women [in the West] because if they were to actually attempt to apply their arguments on a global scale 3 main issues would be encountered.
They'd have to actually do something. Better to just post on social media and complain until a company does the work for them.
They'd have to learn about and understand the actual differences between where they are and where they are saying things need changed [political, geographical, environmental, etc].
And the big one that deserves a topic all to itself despite being a subsection of the second point regarding politics and related matters: Islam.
The term "Islam is right about women" works specifically because it ends up creating a catch 22 for any wokester that looks at it. So of course they ignore it. They ignore how slaves are very much still a thing in parts of Africa and the UAE. They ignore how women in many countries have no rights. They ignore how many people in general are just treated as little more than expendable because it's their "culture".
Regarding the hypocrisy of vegans, an older tv show from 2002 with Dominic Purcell named 'John Doe' had a /thathappened style takedown of such a character and while fictitious is still quite cathartic. Moreso when you realize the annoying hippy in the episode would later play Kavanagh in Stargate Atlantis, yet again another annoying character - albeit one who wasn't always wrong.
This but with the caveat that while I've only seen 'vegans' be extremely ideologically militant, in my experience 'vegetarians' -- outside of foregoing meat -- have a very wide spectrum, with some even being OK with fish.
Same! I thought it was pretty clearly supposed to be "no animal or animal-derived products".
I would hope in the case of sex acts the fact that consent is a human construct would be a moot point.
This is hilarious. Even vegans subconsciously admit that meat is superior. They crave it and try to mimic it with their subpar creations. If they thought soy was actually better, they wouldn't be trying to turn it into something else.
Vegans need supplements to live, those come from butchering animals.
If they cared about animal welfare so much, how about they do some real research into butchering and animal handling so that they can properly request the government restrict major meat manufacturers into more humane methods.
Oh and in regards to muh co2, global warming is not a threat and growing allot of the shit they eat is harder on the environment if grown on the ground due to heavy pesticide use that may not biodegrade.
I like how they think plants just come out of the ground and are available to us with no effort. They don't seem to care about the countless number of small animals that were killed to prevent them from getting into the crops.
Why should they? There's no contradiction in having the same moral consideration line as the rest of us with dogs on one side and locusts on the other, but placing cattle on the dog side and not the locust side.
There is a contradiction. Their whole reason for going vegan is to stop animals from being harmed by eating plants, supposedly. I don't recall vegans ever saying "not this animal, just that one".
In fact I saw a vegan earlier say that killing any animal for food is murder. It should logically follow that killing an animal to protect your food is still murder.
One major fucking cope I read about this is about B vitamins. You get them primarily from meat, so much so that B12 is a major concern for vegans. The mythos about how a vegan diet can be so deficient in something important like that is that humans would naturally get their B12 from bacteria in the dirt that used to present on vegetables before modern sanitation caused plants to be so consistently clean for consumption.
So, in their head, this makes their diet viable, they're just "supplementing" nutrients they're missing from a diet that naturally included fucking dirt.
Sausages and meatballs are the best case scenario for faux meat and they can't pull it off. I tried some Impossible meatballs and you can tell they are made out of pea protein because they taste like peas. Soy shit will usually just taste like the spices with no meat flavor at all. There's a lot of actually good vegan food but this fake meat shit ain't it.
Indian food proves that vegan dishes can absolutely work. But, see, that requires actual effort.
And then you have leafcutter ants that have been farming fungi for at least 45 million years as a food source, something humans only started doing properly in the late 1960s with quorn. It's still designed in a way that it resembles meat but it's an alternative to soy beans.
You should read the ingredients in those faux-meat vegan products.
It's fucking disgusting and absolutely horrible for you. Everything is ultra-processed and pumped full of chemicals and seed oils.
There's no nutritional benefit whatsoever to consuming these things over normal meat. It's a huge negative, in fact.
I tried them out of curiosity because they were leftover because a vegan didn't like them either.
It's not the diet, it's the niche factor that attracts these people. They do it with everything, find it's horrible to experience and makes them miserable, are too much of a vain cunt to stop doing it because they would go back to being normal, and decide everyone must follow their example or die.
If you have a deadly serious allergy to soy products, and you live with a fucking vegan, call me crazy, but they kind of NEED TO KNOW that.
Still, she absolutely should sue rather than pay for their stunt, and because of that, she has to press charges, or any defense for the lawsuit will say 'If it's her fault, why aren't you pressing charges against her?'
The vegan said vegetarian in their response to the ad, if the poster is to be believed.
What is it with vegans and fake meat trying to claim it tastes just as good as real meat? There are so many dishes you can make with actual vegan food without desperately clinging to the "soy chicken" route.
The vegan is a fag for swapping her food out, but she is also a fag if she hadnt asked the vegan to pay without her laywer.
shes also getting mad at reddit and said shes abandoning her account lmao. she sounds very patient and well balanced
It's because they crave meat and know deep down that it is the superior source of nutrition and flavor. Attempting to mimic it with their soy products is a failed attempt to placate their hunger and keep them from abandoning the diet altogether.
Gateway drug for getting non-vegans into the lifestyle. If they can dupe the normal omnivores into eating soy/plants on a regular basis and treating it like it's meat then they can reduce reliance on farmed meats and SaVe ThE eNvIrOnMeNt. Never mind that the farming that produces the soy products pumps more toxins into the environment via weed killers and kills tons of critters that nest in the fields during the growing season once harvest happens.
Is a lot like feminist designed movie/ book characters, is not enough for them to be good, they need to be better then men.
Because human instinct/nature/design still shines through even the densest of skulls.
Because if they ever make it work, it's a huge potential market. If you're the only company in the world who can use the "I Can't Believe It's Not Steak" trademark and everyone knows it lets them get everything they like about eating steak as often as they like, you are going to be a very rich person.