It's almost like if you take the worst of a group that's already fairly bad to start with, you end up with people who are incapable of co-existing with anyone, even each other.
Or, as a rule 16 disclaimer...
If you take the most extremist of the already majority extremist group (young women, the voting record speaks for itself), you end up with people who are too extremist to even be able to coexist with their ideological equals.
In the excellent card game Illumnati one of the faction alignments is "Fanatic".
Most of the other alignments are better at taking over the same alignment and better at destroying (removing from game) opposing alignments..... Except Fanatic, which treats other Fanatic alignment cards as opposite, and thus excels at destroying other Fanatic organizations.
It's almost like if you take the worst of a group that's already fairly bad to start with, you end up with people who are incapable of co-existing with anyone, even each other.
Or, as a rule 16 disclaimer...
If you take the most extremist of the already majority extremist group (young women, the voting record speaks for itself), you end up with people who are too extremist to even be able to coexist with their ideological equals.
In the excellent card game Illumnati one of the faction alignments is "Fanatic".
Most of the other alignments are better at taking over the same alignment and better at destroying (removing from game) opposing alignments..... Except Fanatic, which treats other Fanatic alignment cards as opposite, and thus excels at destroying other Fanatic organizations.