Vegans need supplements to live, those come from butchering animals.
If they cared about animal welfare so much, how about they do some real research into butchering and animal handling so that they can properly request the government restrict major meat manufacturers into more humane methods.
Oh and in regards to muh co2, global warming is not a threat and growing allot of the shit they eat is harder on the environment if grown on the ground due to heavy pesticide use that may not biodegrade.
I like how they think plants just come out of the ground and are available to us with no effort. They don't seem to care about the countless number of small animals that were killed to prevent them from getting into the crops.
They don't seem to care about the countless number of small animals that were killed to prevent them from getting into the crops.
Why should they? There's no contradiction in having the same moral consideration line as the rest of us with dogs on one side and locusts on the other, but placing cattle on the dog side and not the locust side.
There is a contradiction. Their whole reason for going vegan is to stop animals from being harmed by eating plants, supposedly. I don't recall vegans ever saying "not this animal, just that one".
In fact I saw a vegan earlier say that killing any animal for food is murder. It should logically follow that killing an animal to protect your food is still murder.
Vegans need supplements to live, those come from butchering animals.
One major fucking cope I read about this is about B vitamins. You get them primarily from meat, so much so that B12 is a major concern for vegans. The mythos about how a vegan diet can be so deficient in something important like that is that humans would naturally get their B12 from bacteria in the dirt that used to present on vegetables before modern sanitation caused plants to be so consistently clean for consumption.
So, in their head, this makes their diet viable, they're just "supplementing" nutrients they're missing from a diet that naturally included fucking dirt.
Vegans need supplements to live, those come from butchering animals.
If they cared about animal welfare so much, how about they do some real research into butchering and animal handling so that they can properly request the government restrict major meat manufacturers into more humane methods.
Oh and in regards to muh co2, global warming is not a threat and growing allot of the shit they eat is harder on the environment if grown on the ground due to heavy pesticide use that may not biodegrade.
I like how they think plants just come out of the ground and are available to us with no effort. They don't seem to care about the countless number of small animals that were killed to prevent them from getting into the crops.
Why should they? There's no contradiction in having the same moral consideration line as the rest of us with dogs on one side and locusts on the other, but placing cattle on the dog side and not the locust side.
There is a contradiction. Their whole reason for going vegan is to stop animals from being harmed by eating plants, supposedly. I don't recall vegans ever saying "not this animal, just that one".
In fact I saw a vegan earlier say that killing any animal for food is murder. It should logically follow that killing an animal to protect your food is still murder.
One major fucking cope I read about this is about B vitamins. You get them primarily from meat, so much so that B12 is a major concern for vegans. The mythos about how a vegan diet can be so deficient in something important like that is that humans would naturally get their B12 from bacteria in the dirt that used to present on vegetables before modern sanitation caused plants to be so consistently clean for consumption.
So, in their head, this makes their diet viable, they're just "supplementing" nutrients they're missing from a diet that naturally included fucking dirt.