If were talking about someone who actually raped a child, death penalty is 100% the right thing to do. If it’s abuse then it depends on the severity but death penalty should be on the table. If we’re talking about someone with those urges, they shouldn’t be prosecuted at all. Only actions should be prosecuted or we set a very dangerous precedent.
Actual life in prison is a more socially acceptable alternative to death penalty as long as it’s actually life and not 16 years with opportunity for early release on good behavior or some such nonsense (but of course this would never happen).
I would never go so far as torture but I don’t think you should have been censored.
Child molesters pretty-much always molest kids again if they get the opportunity. Judges who set them free know this. Politicians who pass laws forcing judges to set them free after X years know this.
Someone who lacks the impulse control to refrain from molesting kids won't develop that in jail or therapy. Their target victims are easily manipulated and overpowered.
You can't "fix" or "teach" them. They knew what they did was abominable. They knew if they got caught people would want to beat their face to a pulp or send them in jail for as long as possible, with inmates that will be glad to have them as a punching bag. They did it anyway.
Maby a handful that abused a kid while on an inhibition-lowering drug can be rehabilitated if they never take such drugs again.
Nearly all pedos who lacked the impulse control to stop themselves from molesting a kid once will do it again if set free. The ones who don't are the statistical oddity.
Nearly all pedos who molested kids pretend to repent. Be it because lying or sincerity then their lack of impulse control, they keep diddling kids if they can make an opportunity for it.
Response: Lol go live in your bubble retard. The scientific term for "pedophilia" is being interested in prepubescent children, and I have a problem with that. I said if the person they're interested in was 14 for example (which is legal in some places in the west), then they aren't pedo's. The scientific term in "hebephilia".
IIRC the original post was just about research of anyone with "pedophile-like" urges and didn't specify the age or that there had to be a crime involved. Judging by the other comments it looks like u/MK-13 was specifically talking about someone who actually abused minors.
I think we all agree that pedophiles need to at least be isolated and kept away from children. If you have to cull them then so be it, but castration should be enough. Not "chemical castration"... what is even the point of that? Real castration has been used forever and is perfectly humane. Or turn them into eunuchs.
Someone that abuse or rapes a minor... the 18 is pretty safe key, that's why is there... the main reason is because in average, most teenagers end up that stage of their life at that age.
So it makes perfect sense to protect children, pre-adolescents, adolescents/teenagers until that age. (not everybody is the same, but is a really good safe key)
But hey, nice to know that your completely ok with fucking kids from 14 to 17 because they are not "prepubescent children", just because "in some shithole is legal to fuck a 14 years old".
You fuck off with that shit... don't you have family you sick fuck?, what would you think if some 25 years old rapes your 14 years old brother, sister, daughter or something?... get a fuck out of here with that shit.
Lmao people fucking late teens aren't pedos you utter retard. I would not decline prime jb. By that age they already fucked older dudes anyways. 14 year olds in my class 13 years ago fucked guys just because they had a car. They're already whores at that age.
It’s because they’re coombrains who hate women, honestly more than TheImp1. He hates women who hate men, these guys just see women as disposable delights to make them coom. If they don’t see the importance of protecting young children (yes, they are young even if they are trying to fuck people you ignorant fools) over letting them fuck women who look like the girls who turned them down in middle/high school, there’s not much that you or I can say to convince them.
It’s because they’re coombrains who hate women, honestly more than TheImp1. He hates women who hate men, these guys just see women as disposable delights to make them coom.
How am I thinking of women as "disposable delights" if I'm advocating for marriage without divorcing for small things? Doesn't that mean your pump and dump strategy won't work? Unlike you I'm not a sheep. I don't go around following what society thinks as "moral" when it's just a bunch of double standards made to turn real men into femboys or faggots.
yes, they are young even if they are trying to fuck people
They are young but they are capable of consenting to anybody when they start thinking about having sex. When will you stop being retarded and use your brain instead of your dick for a moment?
you ignorant fools
Goes on to insults like every leftist when they can't win an argument. Instead of insulting, you don't you bring some evident on why your theory is right? Sorry I forgot. There isn't any because your statement is a double standard.
over letting them fuck women who look like the girls who turned them down in middle/high school
Again an insult. I've had multiple girl in "middle/high school" wanting to be my girlfriends. But unlike you who think your pump and dump strategy is good, I declined because I don't need used shitholes.
there’s not much that you or I can say to convince them.
Yes there is. It's called bringing evidence instead of double standards. If you haven't seen my character yet, I completely oppose double standards. So either for me when "kids" start having sex from around puberty, then "adults" can have sex with "kids" the same age or nobody has sex until a certain age and everybody gets the same punishment if this rule is broken. I don't have these bullshit double standards made by the government and feminists designed to turn every virgin girl into a used sluts.
Yeah advocating for young "children" to fuck and then proceeding with "Jesus save us". You clearly are either a fake christian because you advocate for premarital sex or a retarded atheist
But is completely fine for people that age to fuck each other right? If you mean nobody should have sex until 18 then fair play. But if you're all for people that age to fuck each other then you can fuck off right off here with your double standards.
Also, why do you guys think its perfectly fine for 50 year olds to fuck 18 year olds but 25 year olds cant fuck 14 year olds?
But hey, nice to know that your completely ok with fucking kids from 14 to 18 because they are not "prepubescent children", just because "in some shithole is legal to fuck a 14 years old".
Rape is not the word but if she's interested and that man wanted to marry her and he won't divorce for later then that's fine by me.
I didn't say anything about minors doing stupid shit, if people didn't educated those kids in the right way, is not my problem... but that doesn't give adults the right to abuse them... adults should know what are the consequences of minors being involved in sexual activities and how those things affects them for the rest of their lives.
It's all about a safe key, don't talk shit about "50 years old that but 25 years old the other"... that is not argument and is a false dichotomy... when they reach 18, generally they already have an understending about consenting and what it means to have sex (good education is part of that)... when they are 14, even if they have desires and urges, they don't understand shit about almost anything... when the years pass, and they reach 18, they have a general idea about how shit works, even if they don't have real experience.
Again, a lot of minors want many things at that age, that doesn't mean it should be allowed to happen... that's why there's a safe key... and is 18 years old, is 18 because of the body and is because of average understanding of actions and consequences when they become young adults.
It has nothing to do with marriage, interest or any other shit... with that logic, having 9 years old wifes in some middle eastern shithole is ok because it's legal to marry them... even worse , under that logic... if a child becomes interested in gay sex or any kind of sex because they are being groomed, once you already allowed "interest" being a safe key to pedophiles... how are you going to stop them from arguing "the kid was interesed" when they get caught?... "hey, is legal to fuck that 14 years old over there because the kid was interest and is legal to marry them... well, the kid i just fucked was interesed, i would marry this kid now, and they want to marry me"... and there you go, pedos have a new free way to legally groom children and abuse them.
Do you approve of people less than 18 years old having sex with each other ? If you do then arguing with you is pointless since you aren't going change your view and have double standards instead.
If you don't then again, fair argument. Is your argument that nobody should have sex until they're 18, and that until they are 18 they should maybe be educated about it?
And why 18 specifically? It has no scientific meaning. No scientist said that people less than 18 are incapable to think about sex. That's why the age of consent is not 18 in most places but 16.
With marriage at least the parents know and every parent I know wouldn't allow it anyway if the age gap was too large. Also, when I say marriage, I mean no premarital sex which I think you got wrong.
I don't have double standard... yes... i don't think minors should have sex, but that doesn't change anything, because i already asnwered that, you just didn't read.
What part of "minors doing stupid shit" sound that i aprove that?
And again, read, ffs... 18 is about having safe key between minors and adults, and i already explained why... do you understand the concept of safe key?.
And just because is legal somewhere, it doens't mean is morally right, or the correct way to deal with the dangers of pedophilia.
"No premarital sex" means nothing when is legal to marry them while being minors.
I don't have double standard... yes... i don't think minors should have sex
Good. you're more reasonable than 98% of other people I've talked with.
What makes me think you approve of that is that you make it not look that bad. You say its not your problem minors do stupid things (having sex below the age of 18) but somehow its your problem for pedophiles doing stupid shit.
The reason why i said is not my problem, is because I can't force parents to educate their kids different, and i can't use the force of the state to indoctrinate children and push sexual agenda on them, that's against my values... not because i think that is not that bad... i can convince parents with my values on my community and country... that's all i do, so if those kids fuck up with other kids, and they commit mistakes between them, you shoudn't jailed them unless there's abuse or rape... because at that age, as i already said, they develop desires and urges, they commit mistakes, both of them are on that stage of their lives when they still don't think about emotional consequences, trauma, and the impact on their lives.
Pedophiles don't do "stupid shit", they fully understand what are they doing... as i said, a decent adult should know better (i already explained what adults understand about kids and teenagers, you are making me repeat this shit again, go back and read).. but we are talking about pedophiles, so they don't give a fuck about respecting kids, they are criminals.
There's a difference between two minors having desires, urges, and commiting mistakes or doing stupid shit between them, because they generally don't are able to understand the consequences of their actions... but adults, in this case pedophiles, they perceive and see those urges and they groom them into having sex with them, perfectly understanding the damage they can do to that minor.
The first, are two minors that don't undersand all the shit that could go wrong in their lives if they are irresponsable (a strong family unit with a good education is the best way to prepare those kids to not do stupid shit)... and the second, is an adult with a full understanging of consequences and damage he could cause, and still decides to have sex with that minor.
So, to not have a stupid blurry line in between.. the best idea until now, is to have a safe key with age... 18.
Goes on with a lot of teenagers being pregnant from dudes twice their age, and becoming single mothers... that's becomes a problem of generations growing up in disfunctional homes... and lowering that child oportunnity to become the best version they could be.
Ask your self why the U.S has become such a shithole full of psyschotic people and why the rest of the world is going for the same path?... and even more... ask yourself why countries that are already shitholes can't get out of that shit?.
It doesn't goes on as normal... there's a reason why two consenting adults can make a good family, raise their children right, and make them become a good asset of their communities... strong families are the heart of great nations.
Keeping with this shit of decriminalizing sex with minors in this ultra oversexualized society we have is not a good thing... it already affected the entire west with entire generations being fucked up in their minds... that's why i talk about that 18 is a good safety key, especially for females. (even if culture is transforming them in retarded bitches).
Just because something is legal, it doesn't mean is morally right.
Yeah right. There was some things that were wrong in "traditional society" but marrying daughters before they became sluts is not one of them. See what the west has become after they stopped doing that. Its now infested with HIV
He fully knows the definition. But he's just one of your typical liberal that wants every young girl to become a thot.
You have to realize that his daughter and wife/girlfriend was probably one of those 12 year old thots and the only way for him to mentally cope with it is making sure every young girl is a thot.
Maturity is related to society. In a society where responsibility comes early, and is supported by society, the age where adulthood is reached may be different.
For example, the legal drinking age is 18 in Canada, but 21 in the US. But in some states you can get learning driving licenses at 14, whereas you have to be 16 in Canada. So I think that's kinda arbitrary, and also both alternative measures of "age or responsibility."
Biologically, 16 years old is usually old enough. I say this as a woman. Is 18 years old old enough emotionally? For some, no. I definitely had a lot more maturing to do between 18 and 22. But I believe this is related to societial pressures and personal experiences.
Someone who assumed someone was 18 when they were 16 is not the same as someone who is interested in prepubescent girls.
I personally am comfortable with 18 as the cutoff age. However, I think there should be increased punishment (minimum time) for grooming, prepubescent molestation, and repeat offenders. I think 6 months imprisonment (refer to my comment above) is a fine sentence for mistaking a 16 year old for an 18 year old. But repeat offenders, young victims, and grooming should require much more time.
I have no problem with your argument if you don't have double standards like MK-13. According to you, is there a problem with lets say, a 12 year old fucking a 13 year old?
The pedos will bring about The Boot that WILL torture them in ways I don't even want to think about.
The last two years has made me understand something I didn't ever want to contemplate...
A bunch of stupid people will die from their stupidity, which will be harnessed by those looking to reduce the population numbers of humans to ensure we can continue into a future that we have not eaten ourselves out of, destroyed our soil out of.
Humans re-introduced the Wolf back into Yellowstone National Park. What happened was ecological-balance.
So here is the deal, if we go full communist, no-one is safe from me. Not even my own party members. This is a warning. There are several million like me who think... "If you don't stop this, I will join this, and all that is sacred is game until you destroy what you should have been vigilant in stopping in the first place."
I have no control over the hunger-games, by my own; though, you do, collectively. Don't rise up, it becomes prevailing, I then play extremely dirty!
If were talking about someone who actually raped a child, death penalty is 100% the right thing to do. If it’s abuse then it depends on the severity but death penalty should be on the table. If we’re talking about someone with those urges, they shouldn’t be prosecuted at all. Only actions should be prosecuted or we set a very dangerous precedent.
Actual life in prison is a more socially acceptable alternative to death penalty as long as it’s actually life and not 16 years with opportunity for early release on good behavior or some such nonsense (but of course this would never happen).
I would never go so far as torture but I don’t think you should have been censored.
Child molesters pretty-much always molest kids again if they get the opportunity. Judges who set them free know this. Politicians who pass laws forcing judges to set them free after X years know this.
Someone who lacks the impulse control to refrain from molesting kids won't develop that in jail or therapy. Their target victims are easily manipulated and overpowered.
You can't "fix" or "teach" them. They knew what they did was abominable. They knew if they got caught people would want to beat their face to a pulp or send them in jail for as long as possible, with inmates that will be glad to have them as a punching bag. They did it anyway.
Maby a handful that abused a kid while on an inhibition-lowering drug can be rehabilitated if they never take such drugs again.
As someone whose friends were abused, the suffering caused lasts a lifetime. And therefore life in prison with suffering sounds fair to me.
The abuser got 6 months with a plea deal.
The abuser has never repented in any way.
The abuser is a serial abuser and may be grooming or abusing more young girls right now.
And that is why I support life in prison, at least, for unrepentant serial abusers with no scruples about grooming young girls.
Life in prison is the bare minimum.
Life in prison is society being too weak to do what needs to be done. We all know the proper punishment for such evil.
Life imprisonment is the society recognizing that it is fallible and even its trials are subject to review.
That said, neck, millstones, sea.
Nearly all pedos who lacked the impulse control to stop themselves from molesting a kid once will do it again if set free. The ones who don't are the statistical oddity.
Nearly all pedos who molested kids pretend to repent. Be it because lying or sincerity then their lack of impulse control, they keep diddling kids if they can make an opportunity for it.
Dom is just a pussy faggot reddit jannie.
You were completely right, and you also went too far by calling for vigilante action, as that can cause trouble for this site.
Fuck off, jannie.
This site is pozzed boomercons
It has nothing to do with optics, and everything to do with the fact that when you start inciting illegal behavior, your site may well be taken down.
Saying that this is something that 'people' should come up with. It sounds like vigilante action.
Yes, targeting people they disagree with, not sacred Jojos.
Who is a "pedo" to you? Someone that is interested in prepubescent children? Or someone who is interested in someone under 18?
If its the former then I might agree. But if its the latter then you can fuck off and the mod did the right thing in removing your comment.
MGTOW PEDERAST.
I had to check what "pederast" means.
Response: Lol go live in your bubble retard. The scientific term for "pedophilia" is being interested in prepubescent children, and I have a problem with that. I said if the person they're interested in was 14 for example (which is legal in some places in the west), then they aren't pedo's. The scientific term in "hebephilia".
And I hate faggots with a passon.
Yes.
IIRC the original post was just about research of anyone with "pedophile-like" urges and didn't specify the age or that there had to be a crime involved. Judging by the other comments it looks like u/MK-13 was specifically talking about someone who actually abused minors.
I think we all agree that pedophiles need to at least be isolated and kept away from children. If you have to cull them then so be it, but castration should be enough. Not "chemical castration"... what is even the point of that? Real castration has been used forever and is perfectly humane. Or turn them into eunuchs.
Someone that abuse or rapes a minor... the 18 is pretty safe key, that's why is there... the main reason is because in average, most teenagers end up that stage of their life at that age.
So it makes perfect sense to protect children, pre-adolescents, adolescents/teenagers until that age. (not everybody is the same, but is a really good safe key)
But hey, nice to know that your completely ok with fucking kids from 14 to 17 because they are not "prepubescent children", just because "in some shithole is legal to fuck a 14 years old".
You fuck off with that shit... don't you have family you sick fuck?, what would you think if some 25 years old rapes your 14 years old brother, sister, daughter or something?... get a fuck out of here with that shit.
Lmao people fucking late teens aren't pedos you utter retard. I would not decline prime jb. By that age they already fucked older dudes anyways. 14 year olds in my class 13 years ago fucked guys just because they had a car. They're already whores at that age.
Yeah right? This guy is deluded
Great argument, shit is fucked up, so let legalize people abuse 13 years old because they were "whores", same with boys being abused.
Don't try to fix it, don't have any kind of morals, don't do anything
No, let's just say "haha", "fucking whores" "retarded".
Shithead.
It’s because they’re coombrains who hate women, honestly more than TheImp1. He hates women who hate men, these guys just see women as disposable delights to make them coom. If they don’t see the importance of protecting young children (yes, they are young even if they are trying to fuck people you ignorant fools) over letting them fuck women who look like the girls who turned them down in middle/high school, there’s not much that you or I can say to convince them.
Jesus save us, modernity has failed us.
How am I thinking of women as "disposable delights" if I'm advocating for marriage without divorcing for small things? Doesn't that mean your pump and dump strategy won't work? Unlike you I'm not a sheep. I don't go around following what society thinks as "moral" when it's just a bunch of double standards made to turn real men into femboys or faggots.
They are young but they are capable of consenting to anybody when they start thinking about having sex. When will you stop being retarded and use your brain instead of your dick for a moment?
Goes on to insults like every leftist when they can't win an argument. Instead of insulting, you don't you bring some evident on why your theory is right? Sorry I forgot. There isn't any because your statement is a double standard.
Again an insult. I've had multiple girl in "middle/high school" wanting to be my girlfriends. But unlike you who think your pump and dump strategy is good, I declined because I don't need used shitholes.
Yes there is. It's called bringing evidence instead of double standards. If you haven't seen my character yet, I completely oppose double standards. So either for me when "kids" start having sex from around puberty, then "adults" can have sex with "kids" the same age or nobody has sex until a certain age and everybody gets the same punishment if this rule is broken. I don't have these bullshit double standards made by the government and feminists designed to turn every virgin girl into a used sluts.
Yeah advocating for young "children" to fuck and then proceeding with "Jesus save us". You clearly are either a fake christian because you advocate for premarital sex or a retarded atheist
But is completely fine for people that age to fuck each other right? If you mean nobody should have sex until 18 then fair play. But if you're all for people that age to fuck each other then you can fuck off right off here with your double standards.
Also, why do you guys think its perfectly fine for 50 year olds to fuck 18 year olds but 25 year olds cant fuck 14 year olds?
Rape is not the word but if she's interested and that man wanted to marry her and he won't divorce for later then that's fine by me.
I didn't say anything about minors doing stupid shit, if people didn't educated those kids in the right way, is not my problem... but that doesn't give adults the right to abuse them... adults should know what are the consequences of minors being involved in sexual activities and how those things affects them for the rest of their lives.
It's all about a safe key, don't talk shit about "50 years old that but 25 years old the other"... that is not argument and is a false dichotomy... when they reach 18, generally they already have an understending about consenting and what it means to have sex (good education is part of that)... when they are 14, even if they have desires and urges, they don't understand shit about almost anything... when the years pass, and they reach 18, they have a general idea about how shit works, even if they don't have real experience.
Again, a lot of minors want many things at that age, that doesn't mean it should be allowed to happen... that's why there's a safe key... and is 18 years old, is 18 because of the body and is because of average understanding of actions and consequences when they become young adults.
It has nothing to do with marriage, interest or any other shit... with that logic, having 9 years old wifes in some middle eastern shithole is ok because it's legal to marry them... even worse , under that logic... if a child becomes interested in gay sex or any kind of sex because they are being groomed, once you already allowed "interest" being a safe key to pedophiles... how are you going to stop them from arguing "the kid was interesed" when they get caught?... "hey, is legal to fuck that 14 years old over there because the kid was interest and is legal to marry them... well, the kid i just fucked was interesed, i would marry this kid now, and they want to marry me"... and there you go, pedos have a new free way to legally groom children and abuse them.
Seriously, wtf is wrong with you?
You still didn't answer my question.
Do you approve of people less than 18 years old having sex with each other ? If you do then arguing with you is pointless since you aren't going change your view and have double standards instead.
If you don't then again, fair argument. Is your argument that nobody should have sex until they're 18, and that until they are 18 they should maybe be educated about it?
And why 18 specifically? It has no scientific meaning. No scientist said that people less than 18 are incapable to think about sex. That's why the age of consent is not 18 in most places but 16.
With marriage at least the parents know and every parent I know wouldn't allow it anyway if the age gap was too large. Also, when I say marriage, I mean no premarital sex which I think you got wrong.
I don't have double standard... yes... i don't think minors should have sex, but that doesn't change anything, because i already asnwered that, you just didn't read.
What part of "minors doing stupid shit" sound that i aprove that?
And again, read, ffs... 18 is about having safe key between minors and adults, and i already explained why... do you understand the concept of safe key?.
And just because is legal somewhere, it doens't mean is morally right, or the correct way to deal with the dangers of pedophilia.
"No premarital sex" means nothing when is legal to marry them while being minors.
Good. you're more reasonable than 98% of other people I've talked with.
What makes me think you approve of that is that you make it not look that bad. You say its not your problem minors do stupid things (having sex below the age of 18) but somehow its your problem for pedophiles doing stupid shit.
The reason why i said is not my problem, is because I can't force parents to educate their kids different, and i can't use the force of the state to indoctrinate children and push sexual agenda on them, that's against my values... not because i think that is not that bad... i can convince parents with my values on my community and country... that's all i do, so if those kids fuck up with other kids, and they commit mistakes between them, you shoudn't jailed them unless there's abuse or rape... because at that age, as i already said, they develop desires and urges, they commit mistakes, both of them are on that stage of their lives when they still don't think about emotional consequences, trauma, and the impact on their lives.
Pedophiles don't do "stupid shit", they fully understand what are they doing... as i said, a decent adult should know better (i already explained what adults understand about kids and teenagers, you are making me repeat this shit again, go back and read).. but we are talking about pedophiles, so they don't give a fuck about respecting kids, they are criminals.
There's a difference between two minors having desires, urges, and commiting mistakes or doing stupid shit between them, because they generally don't are able to understand the consequences of their actions... but adults, in this case pedophiles, they perceive and see those urges and they groom them into having sex with them, perfectly understanding the damage they can do to that minor.
The first, are two minors that don't undersand all the shit that could go wrong in their lives if they are irresponsable (a strong family unit with a good education is the best way to prepare those kids to not do stupid shit)... and the second, is an adult with a full understanging of consequences and damage he could cause, and still decides to have sex with that minor.
So, to not have a stupid blurry line in between.. the best idea until now, is to have a safe key with age... 18.
Why 18?... go back and read,
I can't make it more clear than that, dude.
I guess Yemen is your guiding light.
Goes on with a lot of teenagers being pregnant from dudes twice their age, and becoming single mothers... that's becomes a problem of generations growing up in disfunctional homes... and lowering that child oportunnity to become the best version they could be.
Ask your self why the U.S has become such a shithole full of psyschotic people and why the rest of the world is going for the same path?... and even more... ask yourself why countries that are already shitholes can't get out of that shit?.
It doesn't goes on as normal... there's a reason why two consenting adults can make a good family, raise their children right, and make them become a good asset of their communities... strong families are the heart of great nations.
Keeping with this shit of decriminalizing sex with minors in this ultra oversexualized society we have is not a good thing... it already affected the entire west with entire generations being fucked up in their minds... that's why i talk about that 18 is a good safety key, especially for females. (even if culture is transforming them in retarded bitches).
Just because something is legal, it doesn't mean is morally right.
Yeah right. There was some things that were wrong in "traditional society" but marrying daughters before they became sluts is not one of them. See what the west has become after they stopped doing that. Its now infested with HIV
Yeah, talking about how laws are important to stop pedophilia is not geting out of the house now.
Great.
He fully knows the definition. But he's just one of your typical liberal that wants every young girl to become a thot.
You have to realize that his daughter and wife/girlfriend was probably one of those 12 year old thots and the only way for him to mentally cope with it is making sure every young girl is a thot.
Maturity is related to society. In a society where responsibility comes early, and is supported by society, the age where adulthood is reached may be different.
For example, the legal drinking age is 18 in Canada, but 21 in the US. But in some states you can get learning driving licenses at 14, whereas you have to be 16 in Canada. So I think that's kinda arbitrary, and also both alternative measures of "age or responsibility."
Biologically, 16 years old is usually old enough. I say this as a woman. Is 18 years old old enough emotionally? For some, no. I definitely had a lot more maturing to do between 18 and 22. But I believe this is related to societial pressures and personal experiences.
Someone who assumed someone was 18 when they were 16 is not the same as someone who is interested in prepubescent girls.
I personally am comfortable with 18 as the cutoff age. However, I think there should be increased punishment (minimum time) for grooming, prepubescent molestation, and repeat offenders. I think 6 months imprisonment (refer to my comment above) is a fine sentence for mistaking a 16 year old for an 18 year old. But repeat offenders, young victims, and grooming should require much more time.
I have no problem with your argument if you don't have double standards like MK-13. According to you, is there a problem with lets say, a 12 year old fucking a 13 year old?
Yeah I don’t know why they treat this site as Reddit-lite either.
And pedos deserve to die. The only debate should be if it’s fast or slow. I will not entertain their bullshit for a second. Ever.
Does anybody else get a little suspicious about people who complain all the time about pedos?
The pedos will bring about The Boot that WILL torture them in ways I don't even want to think about.
The last two years has made me understand something I didn't ever want to contemplate...
A bunch of stupid people will die from their stupidity, which will be harnessed by those looking to reduce the population numbers of humans to ensure we can continue into a future that we have not eaten ourselves out of, destroyed our soil out of.
Humans re-introduced the Wolf back into Yellowstone National Park. What happened was ecological-balance.
So here is the deal, if we go full communist, no-one is safe from me. Not even my own party members. This is a warning. There are several million like me who think... "If you don't stop this, I will join this, and all that is sacred is game until you destroy what you should have been vigilant in stopping in the first place."
I have no control over the hunger-games, by my own; though, you do, collectively. Don't rise up, it becomes prevailing, I then play extremely dirty!
They aren't. The rules apply to everyone, particularly Rule 2.
Then call for pedophilia to be a capital crime. Rule 2 still has to apply to everyone.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Removed: Rule 2 - Violent Speech