1
mgtowman 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s because they’re coombrains who hate women, honestly more than TheImp1. He hates women who hate men, these guys just see women as disposable delights to make them coom.

How am I thinking of women as "disposable delights" if I'm advocating for marriage without divorcing for small things? Doesn't that mean your pump and dump strategy won't work? Unlike you I'm not a sheep. I don't go around following what society thinks as "moral" when it's just a bunch of double standards made to turn real men into femboys or faggots.

yes, they are young even if they are trying to fuck people

They are young but they are capable of consenting to anybody when they start thinking about having sex. When will you stop being retarded and use your brain instead of your dick for a moment?

you ignorant fools

Goes on to insults like every leftist when they can't win an argument. Instead of insulting, you don't you bring some evident on why your theory is right? Sorry I forgot. There isn't any because your statement is a double standard.

over letting them fuck women who look like the girls who turned them down in middle/high school

Again an insult. I've had multiple girl in "middle/high school" wanting to be my girlfriends. But unlike you who think your pump and dump strategy is good, I declined because I don't need used shitholes.

there’s not much that you or I can say to convince them.

Yes there is. It's called bringing evidence instead of double standards. If you haven't seen my character yet, I completely oppose double standards. So either for me when "kids" start having sex from around puberty, then "adults" can have sex with "kids" the same age or nobody has sex until a certain age and everybody gets the same punishment if this rule is broken. I don't have these bullshit double standards made by the government and feminists designed to turn every virgin girl into a used sluts.

Yeah advocating for young "children" to fuck and then proceeding with "Jesus save us". You clearly are either a fake christian because you advocate for premarital sex or a retarded atheist

1
mgtowman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have no problem with your argument if you don't have double standards like MK-13. According to you, is there a problem with lets say, a 12 year old fucking a 13 year old?

3
mgtowman 3 points ago +3 / -0

He fully knows the definition. But he's just one of your typical liberal that wants every young girl to become a thot.

You have to realize that his daughter and wife/girlfriend was probably one of those 12 year old thots and the only way for him to mentally cope with it is making sure every young girl is a thot.

5
mgtowman 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah right. There was some things that were wrong in "traditional society" but marrying daughters before they became sluts is not one of them. See what the west has become after they stopped doing that. Its now infested with HIV

2
mgtowman 2 points ago +2 / -0

What I'm saying is that people shouldn't have sex below 18 and that there is no mistake same how there is no mistake for pedophiles. Nowhere did I defend pedophiles.

I've explained how they understand but you clearly refuse to read it.

And yes they should be jailed the same way 10 year old get jailed for watching child porn like I explained in my comment.

You're also one of those people who think its completely fine for a 100 year old to have sex with 18 year olds but a 25 year olds aren't allowed to come near a 14 year old.

Yeah I realized you weren't reasonable and probably the dumbest I've argued with. You clearly have double standards and I'm not going to argue with you any longer since its impossible to change your deranged view.

Bye

2
mgtowman 2 points ago +2 / -0

I disagree

I live in an area where I was taught sex education at school very early. These "minors" should absolutely know what they are doing. But since the government is really lax about it, most start having sex before the age of 18.

There is no difference between a minor having sex with another minor and a pedophile having sex with a minor. I oppose both, and think both should have the same punishment.

Why don't they teach kids to contain their urges? They also purposefully have an education system where boys and girls are in the same room. Of course they are going to have hormones. Then they are going to fuck and tell everybody about it and not a single thing will be done. I've had 13 year olds boast about having sex at school. And they very well knew the consequences about it. The girl even worried about if she was going to become pregnant. Since nothing was done about it, it encourages it.

Why can't we have an education system where boys and girls are taught in different schools? Simple. Because the government and the brainwashed people want minors to have sex with each other.

Your post also shows double standards.

Somehow we can't force people less than 18 not to have sex, but we must with pedophiles.

You say that the minors don't understand the consequences but I could argue that the pedos also don't too because they thought it would be fine since the minor agreed to it.

When mentioning minors fucking minors, you say its a mistake. But when mentioning pedophiles its a crime to humanity. It could also be a mistake and they could have learned about it the same way the minors do. The minor fucking another minor could also ruin a minor the same way a pedophile could ruin a minor.

I thought you would be more reasonable but clearly you're not.

I heard there was also a kid in the UK who got arrested at the age of 10 for watching child porn. But if he had sex instead he would be totally fine.

Solution:

*Treat and shame them both the same.

*Have education where boys and girls go to different schools.

*Make it illegal for minors to have sex below 18 and make it heard everywhere so people can't claim they didn't know.

*Police should give a fuck about it. When someone boasts about having sex at the age of 11, they should be investigated and jailed in some youth prison.

*Punishment should be severe so people will be afraid of doing it in the first place.

So yes, parents should be forced to teach their kids about not having sex before 18 and the law should punish the people that do.

When they don't get punished they are going to tell their children its normal and totally worth it and their children will do the same and it will continue. Whereas if they got jailed they would make sure their kids don't do the same and they will tell them about the consequences and how it isn't worth it.

Until they do, I find being a hebephile completely normal.

1
mgtowman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't have double standard... yes... i don't think minors should have sex

Good. you're more reasonable than 98% of other people I've talked with.

What makes me think you approve of that is that you make it not look that bad. You say its not your problem minors do stupid things (having sex below the age of 18) but somehow its your problem for pedophiles doing stupid shit.

3
mgtowman 3 points ago +3 / -0

You still didn't answer my question.

Do you approve of people less than 18 years old having sex with each other ? If you do then arguing with you is pointless since you aren't going change your view and have double standards instead.

If you don't then again, fair argument. Is your argument that nobody should have sex until they're 18, and that until they are 18 they should maybe be educated about it?

And why 18 specifically? It has no scientific meaning. No scientist said that people less than 18 are incapable to think about sex. That's why the age of consent is not 18 in most places but 16.

With marriage at least the parents know and every parent I know wouldn't allow it anyway if the age gap was too large. Also, when I say marriage, I mean no premarital sex which I think you got wrong.

3
mgtowman 3 points ago +3 / -0

But is completely fine for people that age to fuck each other right? If you mean nobody should have sex until 18 then fair play. But if you're all for people that age to fuck each other then you can fuck off right off here with your double standards.

Also, why do you guys think its perfectly fine for 50 year olds to fuck 18 year olds but 25 year olds cant fuck 14 year olds?

But hey, nice to know that your completely ok with fucking kids from 14 to 18 because they are not "prepubescent children", just because "in some shithole is legal to fuck a 14 years old".

Rape is not the word but if she's interested and that man wanted to marry her and he won't divorce for later then that's fine by me.

6
mgtowman 6 points ago +6 / -0

I had to check what "pederast" means.

Response: Lol go live in your bubble retard. The scientific term for "pedophilia" is being interested in prepubescent children, and I have a problem with that. I said if the person they're interested in was 14 for example (which is legal in some places in the west), then they aren't pedo's. The scientific term in "hebephilia".

And I hate faggots with a passon.

3
mgtowman 3 points ago +4 / -1

Who is a "pedo" to you? Someone that is interested in prepubescent children? Or someone who is interested in someone under 18?

If its the former then I might agree. But if its the latter then you can fuck off and the mod did the right thing in removing your comment.