But is completely fine for people that age to fuck each other right? If you mean nobody should have sex until 18 then fair play. But if you're all for people that age to fuck each other then you can fuck off right off here with your double standards.
Also, why do you guys think its perfectly fine for 50 year olds to fuck 18 year olds but 25 year olds cant fuck 14 year olds?
But hey, nice to know that your completely ok with fucking kids from 14 to 18 because they are not "prepubescent children", just because "in some shithole is legal to fuck a 14 years old".
Rape is not the word but if she's interested and that man wanted to marry her and he won't divorce for later then that's fine by me.
I didn't say anything about minors doing stupid shit, if people didn't educated those kids in the right way, is not my problem... but that doesn't give adults the right to abuse them... adults should know what are the consequences of minors being involved in sexual activities and how those things affects them for the rest of their lives.
It's all about a safe key, don't talk shit about "50 years old that but 25 years old the other"... that is not argument and is a false dichotomy... when they reach 18, generally they already have an understending about consenting and what it means to have sex (good education is part of that)... when they are 14, even if they have desires and urges, they don't understand shit about almost anything... when the years pass, and they reach 18, they have a general idea about how shit works, even if they don't have real experience.
Again, a lot of minors want many things at that age, that doesn't mean it should be allowed to happen... that's why there's a safe key... and is 18 years old, is 18 because of the body and is because of average understanding of actions and consequences when they become young adults.
It has nothing to do with marriage, interest or any other shit... with that logic, having 9 years old wifes in some middle eastern shithole is ok because it's legal to marry them... even worse , under that logic... if a child becomes interested in gay sex or any kind of sex because they are being groomed, once you already allowed "interest" being a safe key to pedophiles... how are you going to stop them from arguing "the kid was interesed" when they get caught?... "hey, is legal to fuck that 14 years old over there because the kid was interest and is legal to marry them... well, the kid i just fucked was interesed, i would marry this kid now, and they want to marry me"... and there you go, pedos have a new free way to legally groom children and abuse them.
Do you approve of people less than 18 years old having sex with each other ? If you do then arguing with you is pointless since you aren't going change your view and have double standards instead.
If you don't then again, fair argument. Is your argument that nobody should have sex until they're 18, and that until they are 18 they should maybe be educated about it?
And why 18 specifically? It has no scientific meaning. No scientist said that people less than 18 are incapable to think about sex. That's why the age of consent is not 18 in most places but 16.
With marriage at least the parents know and every parent I know wouldn't allow it anyway if the age gap was too large. Also, when I say marriage, I mean no premarital sex which I think you got wrong.
I don't have double standard... yes... i don't think minors should have sex, but that doesn't change anything, because i already asnwered that, you just didn't read.
What part of "minors doing stupid shit" sound that i aprove that?
And again, read, ffs... 18 is about having safe key between minors and adults, and i already explained why... do you understand the concept of safe key?.
And just because is legal somewhere, it doens't mean is morally right, or the correct way to deal with the dangers of pedophilia.
"No premarital sex" means nothing when is legal to marry them while being minors.
I don't have double standard... yes... i don't think minors should have sex
Good. you're more reasonable than 98% of other people I've talked with.
What makes me think you approve of that is that you make it not look that bad. You say its not your problem minors do stupid things (having sex below the age of 18) but somehow its your problem for pedophiles doing stupid shit.
But is completely fine for people that age to fuck each other right? If you mean nobody should have sex until 18 then fair play. But if you're all for people that age to fuck each other then you can fuck off right off here with your double standards.
Also, why do you guys think its perfectly fine for 50 year olds to fuck 18 year olds but 25 year olds cant fuck 14 year olds?
Rape is not the word but if she's interested and that man wanted to marry her and he won't divorce for later then that's fine by me.
I didn't say anything about minors doing stupid shit, if people didn't educated those kids in the right way, is not my problem... but that doesn't give adults the right to abuse them... adults should know what are the consequences of minors being involved in sexual activities and how those things affects them for the rest of their lives.
It's all about a safe key, don't talk shit about "50 years old that but 25 years old the other"... that is not argument and is a false dichotomy... when they reach 18, generally they already have an understending about consenting and what it means to have sex (good education is part of that)... when they are 14, even if they have desires and urges, they don't understand shit about almost anything... when the years pass, and they reach 18, they have a general idea about how shit works, even if they don't have real experience.
Again, a lot of minors want many things at that age, that doesn't mean it should be allowed to happen... that's why there's a safe key... and is 18 years old, is 18 because of the body and is because of average understanding of actions and consequences when they become young adults.
It has nothing to do with marriage, interest or any other shit... with that logic, having 9 years old wifes in some middle eastern shithole is ok because it's legal to marry them... even worse , under that logic... if a child becomes interested in gay sex or any kind of sex because they are being groomed, once you already allowed "interest" being a safe key to pedophiles... how are you going to stop them from arguing "the kid was interesed" when they get caught?... "hey, is legal to fuck that 14 years old over there because the kid was interest and is legal to marry them... well, the kid i just fucked was interesed, i would marry this kid now, and they want to marry me"... and there you go, pedos have a new free way to legally groom children and abuse them.
Seriously, wtf is wrong with you?
You still didn't answer my question.
Do you approve of people less than 18 years old having sex with each other ? If you do then arguing with you is pointless since you aren't going change your view and have double standards instead.
If you don't then again, fair argument. Is your argument that nobody should have sex until they're 18, and that until they are 18 they should maybe be educated about it?
And why 18 specifically? It has no scientific meaning. No scientist said that people less than 18 are incapable to think about sex. That's why the age of consent is not 18 in most places but 16.
With marriage at least the parents know and every parent I know wouldn't allow it anyway if the age gap was too large. Also, when I say marriage, I mean no premarital sex which I think you got wrong.
I don't have double standard... yes... i don't think minors should have sex, but that doesn't change anything, because i already asnwered that, you just didn't read.
What part of "minors doing stupid shit" sound that i aprove that?
And again, read, ffs... 18 is about having safe key between minors and adults, and i already explained why... do you understand the concept of safe key?.
And just because is legal somewhere, it doens't mean is morally right, or the correct way to deal with the dangers of pedophilia.
"No premarital sex" means nothing when is legal to marry them while being minors.
Good. you're more reasonable than 98% of other people I've talked with.
What makes me think you approve of that is that you make it not look that bad. You say its not your problem minors do stupid things (having sex below the age of 18) but somehow its your problem for pedophiles doing stupid shit.