Because the other 99% didn't take them seriously while the group slowly chipped away at society every day.
It's like when religious conservatives in the 50s and 60s thought "They'll never take the Ten Commandments of the wall. They'll never stop saying the Pledge of Allegiance or prayer in school." and laughed at the opposition making fools of themselves in public.
Yeah because Moses brought down the 10 commandments from mount Sinai for the Christians who didn’t exist for another couple hundred years….. you know because Christ had not been born yet. And is prophesied about in the Old Testament…. You know the same books of the Bible Jews read and believe.
I agree with most everything except the part where you said "judeo-Christian"
"judeo" and "Christian" are fundamentally opposed both theologically and politically.
To be a Jew in the modern age is to reject Christ, the Talmud acknowledges this and insults Christ accordingly.
You complain that Hollywood and the media are anti-Christian and anti-West because they promote LGBT, diversity, degeneracy, etc, (which is true) yet you fail to realize that Hollywood and the media are that way because they are both completely owned and largely staffed by Jews, who use movies and media to spread their agenda.
Drop the "judeo-Christian" nonsense, everything else you said is basically true but using that phrase makes you look like an idiot because Jews as a group tend to hate Christianity, and a small minority of wealthy and powerful Jews are working to dismantle Western civilization because they resent it.
National Socialists like you aren't worth being engaged with, save with 5.56 of course
Wow so brave. You ignored my argument, called me a Nazi, and said I should be shot. You been taking debate classes from the Leftists?
Also if you knew anything about WW2 you would know the M1 Garand shoots 30-06, not 5.56. Idc if you choose to talk like a retard, but at least be historically accurate
Marxism, as a whole the movement realised that agitation along "worker" lines wasn't working. It's very rare to hear workers of the world unite, shed your chains etc.
So now it's focused on class, specifically race and sex, because they are far more effective as a lever against society.
I saw something posted a while ago that theorised it's because many are millenial NEETs [possibly autistic] that were easily swayed/groomed in some desperate attempt to have somewhere to fit in.
Because of the much wider reach online communication grants compared to 20 years ago and beyond this means extreme minority groups can find one another when originally they would have been so isolated they may rarely, if ever, interact with another of their group.
As they are NEETs by definition they have all the time in the world to immerse themselves in online groups and eventually beat out others through sheer autistic perseverance to rise to positions of moderation.
The notion of removing references to a person's original name is completely asinine. I don't care if you call it dead naming to try and shame the people that do it. I call it accuracy. You don't get to erase history just because you've decided to change your name and identity.
You want people to refer to you by some new name now? Sure, whatever. Change your name legally and introduce yourself by your new name going forward. Most people will make an effort to learn your new name if they have any investment in your existence at all. And the people that don't care whether you exist or not won't care anyway. You don't matter to them. They probably won't refer to you at all.
You want people to change the way they remember past events when you went by another name and presented yourself in another manner though? Go fuck yourself. My memories about you and the way I explain them to others isn't within the realm of your control.
The only real shock here is that Wikipedia hasn't given them their way. Who would have thought that a place infested with the wokists who butchered the GG article would keep references to a tranny's real name?
They have very strange arbitrary rules... apparently you are only "allowed" to mention the tranny's birth name if they were "famous before announcing they were transgender". The articles on people who were never famous before claiming to be transgender are barred from mentioning the birth name.
I can't help but wonder if that rule was created to help a certain troon hide the fact that John Walker Flynt ever existed. They have a real hate boner for us and it would certainly fit into their pattern of helping cover up unflattering facts about the bad actors on the anti side.
I think it makes perfect sense actually. A lot of people are still searching for the original names of these celebrities and if they eliminated those names they would risk losing out in search traffic.
I've always said... some celebrity needs to troll the idiots at Wikipedia and other mainstream publications, by changing their "self-identified gender" every day or so, forcing Wikipedia to change it every single day... because they will, they have to, that's their stupid fucking policy.
Even private parties need to keep a record - any married woman knows that. It makes sense for anyone who changes their name to have a paper trail and register of those changes for identification purposes if nothing else.
And medical records. John Doe is deathly allergic to bee stings. Sarah Doe was stung by a bee, and died. Who knew Sarah was allergic to bees, we had no medical records for them before they turned 38 because that would be transphobic.
Because the other 99% didn't take them seriously while the group slowly chipped away at society every day.
It's like when religious conservatives in the 50s and 60s thought "They'll never take the Ten Commandments of the wall. They'll never stop saying the Pledge of Allegiance or prayer in school." and laughed at the opposition making fools of themselves in public.
Then all of it happened, and worse.
Makes no sense to me either.
Yeah because Moses brought down the 10 commandments from mount Sinai for the Christians who didn’t exist for another couple hundred years….. you know because Christ had not been born yet. And is prophesied about in the Old Testament…. You know the same books of the Bible Jews read and believe.
I agree with most everything except the part where you said "judeo-Christian"
"judeo" and "Christian" are fundamentally opposed both theologically and politically.
To be a Jew in the modern age is to reject Christ, the Talmud acknowledges this and insults Christ accordingly.
You complain that Hollywood and the media are anti-Christian and anti-West because they promote LGBT, diversity, degeneracy, etc, (which is true) yet you fail to realize that Hollywood and the media are that way because they are both completely owned and largely staffed by Jews, who use movies and media to spread their agenda.
Drop the "judeo-Christian" nonsense, everything else you said is basically true but using that phrase makes you look like an idiot because Jews as a group tend to hate Christianity, and a small minority of wealthy and powerful Jews are working to dismantle Western civilization because they resent it.
You know I'm right. That's why you can't debunk anything I've said and are resorting to childish rebuttals that basically amount to "go away".
If you need biblical guidance, check out Revelations 2:9 and Revelations 3:9. Thessalonians 2:14-15 as well.
Or if you want the words of Jesus Himself, read the second half of John 8, starting around verse 34.
Wow so brave. You ignored my argument, called me a Nazi, and said I should be shot. You been taking debate classes from the Leftists?
Also if you knew anything about WW2 you would know the M1 Garand shoots 30-06, not 5.56. Idc if you choose to talk like a retard, but at least be historically accurate
TL;DR
Marxism, as a whole the movement realised that agitation along "worker" lines wasn't working. It's very rare to hear workers of the world unite, shed your chains etc.
So now it's focused on class, specifically race and sex, because they are far more effective as a lever against society.
I saw something posted a while ago that theorised it's because many are millenial NEETs [possibly autistic] that were easily swayed/groomed in some desperate attempt to have somewhere to fit in.
Because of the much wider reach online communication grants compared to 20 years ago and beyond this means extreme minority groups can find one another when originally they would have been so isolated they may rarely, if ever, interact with another of their group.
As they are NEETs by definition they have all the time in the world to immerse themselves in online groups and eventually beat out others through sheer autistic perseverance to rise to positions of moderation.
Because nobody wants to actually interact with those freaks so we ignored them for too long
The notion of removing references to a person's original name is completely asinine. I don't care if you call it dead naming to try and shame the people that do it. I call it accuracy. You don't get to erase history just because you've decided to change your name and identity.
You want people to refer to you by some new name now? Sure, whatever. Change your name legally and introduce yourself by your new name going forward. Most people will make an effort to learn your new name if they have any investment in your existence at all. And the people that don't care whether you exist or not won't care anyway. You don't matter to them. They probably won't refer to you at all.
You want people to change the way they remember past events when you went by another name and presented yourself in another manner though? Go fuck yourself. My memories about you and the way I explain them to others isn't within the realm of your control.
Yes, all material mentioning Ellen Page goes into the memory hole. We were always at war with Eastasia.
Ultimate Warrior never held any WWE championships
The only real shock here is that Wikipedia hasn't given them their way. Who would have thought that a place infested with the wokists who butchered the GG article would keep references to a tranny's real name?
They have very strange arbitrary rules... apparently you are only "allowed" to mention the tranny's birth name if they were "famous before announcing they were transgender". The articles on people who were never famous before claiming to be transgender are barred from mentioning the birth name.
I can't help but wonder if that rule was created to help a certain troon hide the fact that John Walker Flynt ever existed. They have a real hate boner for us and it would certainly fit into their pattern of helping cover up unflattering facts about the bad actors on the anti side.
Who?
Exactly.
Literally
Brianna Wu's original name.
I think it makes perfect sense actually. A lot of people are still searching for the original names of these celebrities and if they eliminated those names they would risk losing out in search traffic.
This is what annoys me. I’m a fan of Inception and Hard Candy. I’ve never seen an Elliot Page film. History happened
I've always said... some celebrity needs to troll the idiots at Wikipedia and other mainstream publications, by changing their "self-identified gender" every day or so, forcing Wikipedia to change it every single day... because they will, they have to, that's their stupid fucking policy.
Ellen who? I forgot about her. Has she 50% yet?
No, she was at AOC's Hunger Games last week and looking as miserable as ever.
50%? Are you referring to becoming an hero? I thought that was 41%.
Euthanizing the troons would be a mercy.
Even private parties need to keep a record - any married woman knows that. It makes sense for anyone who changes their name to have a paper trail and register of those changes for identification purposes if nothing else.
And medical records. John Doe is deathly allergic to bee stings. Sarah Doe was stung by a bee, and died. Who knew Sarah was allergic to bees, we had no medical records for them before they turned 38 because that would be transphobic.
You think that's transphobia? "Sarah" Doe was once told he needed a prostate exam because he's a fucking man. The REEEEEing continues to this day.