This past year has taught me that some people don't learn at all. Like the guy who put pro-BLM signage on his store...and his store still got smashed up by BLM rioters...and he didn't fault them for it nor change his opinion about BLM.
Tim recently did a video on this and he also said fuck these guys. He said a long time ago he would be defending these people but now he's realized these fuckers are standing in the way of actual free speech.
Left wing hall monitors like these assholes need to be purged. They're directly trying to remove my free speech rights. Fuck'em.
I hit my limit at this Chinese Virus. People talking about things that could save lives was being censored to make sure Orange Man Bad.
I was a free speech absolutist. Everything is fair game. But, expect me to support someone's free speech for them to thank me by advocating my speech be taken? Fuck that.
Carl Sagan used to talk about the Golden Rule, some more virtuous versions, and some less virtuous (but perhaps more practical) ones. There's the Brazen Rule: "Do unto others as they have done unto you", and the Iron Rule: "Do unto others as you like, before they do it unto you."
That sounds like a great way to turn people into passive slaves. "Just sit there and take it or god will wag his finger at you after you're dead and gone".
I never understood the "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" saying. It's pretending like there aren't selfish assholes (with both eyes) out there striking first and going for the eyes of others. Defending yourself and striking back is going to make everyone blind how exactly?
The only way for it to be possible to break the cycle of reciprocal violence is for people to abstain from participating in it, even at the cost of martyrdom.
Completely wrong. Both on a conceptual level and a practical one. On a conceptual level, there is no perpetual cycle of reciprocal violence. Reciprocal violence is a minor fraction of all violence in the world and is never 100% elastic (I.E. some proportion of people decline to reciprocate, so retaliation over time trends to zero), the much greater majority of violence is impulsive/uninstigated.
And on a practical level, advocating absolute pacifism in those disinclined to instigate violence only guarantees the egregious applications of violence only get worse, because that makes anyone inclined to instigate violence the automatic survivors, at which point they'll just keep doing what both came naturally and was successful ever more.
If you want overall violence to go down you want people unwilling to instigate violence over nothing but willing to punish instigating violence with even more overpowering violence, and for those people to be a greater force than the people willing to instigate violence for their own purposes
And on a practical level, advocating absolute pacifism in those disinclined to instigate violence only guarantees the egregious applications of violence only get worse
That's your view. For clarity, I'm going to call you a Heinleinist, an adherent of the theory of deterrence.
Christ's view was the contrary.
I'm not going to argue the merits of the respective philosophies.
I'm just going to emphasize that you CANNOT be BOTH a Heinleinist and a Christian. They are mutually incompatible philosophies. Heinlein tells you to deter. Christ tells you to leave it to god; all men WILL die, and the question is whether you die with bloody hands or clean.
"You're going to die young because you smoked thirty cigarettes a day since you were fifteen. And you're going to go to hell, because of the life you took. You're fucked." -Gabriel, Constantine
"An eye for an eye implies you've severely failed in your efforts to de-eye your opponent. How can someone with no eyes best you and remove your eyes?"
An eye for an eye leaves a one-eyed man and a blind man. And in the world of the blind, the one eyed man is king.
To be fair this is what I’m telling my daughter. They teach the golden rule at school. I tell her if that kid is going to be mean to her she can be mean back. You start out nice but if it’s not reciprocated, screw em. I don’t want her getting abused her whole life because of this mindset.
Fuck their learning. I don't want them to learn, I want them to finally be punished for all the evil shit they've done. At this point, silencing liberals is a matter of self preservation.
They absolutely refuse to learn from their mistakes and will instead just double down their way into the next trap. Over and over until they have nothing left-- quite the same as what they wish for their opponents--
These people would go out of their way to water plants during a monsoon
Probably, some bot or human drone mistook it for being actually right-wing and banned it, but YouTube corrected this after realizing it was anti-right-wing.
Interesting move here, since you would expect both parties to be on the same side. Is there some sort of deep state policy shift going, or is this diversion tactics? Possibly the ‘conspiracy theories’ are so convincing that simply spreading them even with the intent to discredit them is too dangerous.
Lets just keep reporting their stuff. Honestly, its what they do to us. Even if they probably gonna get unbanned. Its the hassle and fear for a few hours to get unbanned.
They claimed to be in support of exposing extremism from the fringes of the far right. But, when you're stricken with TDS, everything is nazis and Trump nazis.
I really wish people would stop with the "i'll defend your right to free speech even though you'd deny me mine"
Just stop it, the only way theyre gonna learn is when the monster turns on its creators.
This past year has taught me that some people don't learn at all. Like the guy who put pro-BLM signage on his store...and his store still got smashed up by BLM rioters...and he didn't fault them for it nor change his opinion about BLM.
"Why would Trump do this?!"
"They smashed your fucking store!"
"Yeah, well, they're just a little misguided, is all. They're good kids. I'm sure they just need a little time to reflect."
Cucks like this are why we need to wall up that city. It breeds them.
Sometimes you cannot tell the people. You must show them.
Tim recently did a video on this and he also said fuck these guys. He said a long time ago he would be defending these people but now he's realized these fuckers are standing in the way of actual free speech.
Left wing hall monitors like these assholes need to be purged. They're directly trying to remove my free speech rights. Fuck'em.
I hit my limit at this Chinese Virus. People talking about things that could save lives was being censored to make sure Orange Man Bad.
I was a free speech absolutist. Everything is fair game. But, expect me to support someone's free speech for them to thank me by advocating my speech be taken? Fuck that.
Suppress people's free speech rights at the cost of actual lives? Yeah, fuck you and everyone who thinks like you, Youtube.
Someone really needs to update the golden rule: Treat others as they would treat you.
Carl Sagan used to talk about the Golden Rule, some more virtuous versions, and some less virtuous (but perhaps more practical) ones. There's the Brazen Rule: "Do unto others as they have done unto you", and the Iron Rule: "Do unto others as you like, before they do it unto you."
That sounds like a great way to turn people into passive slaves. "Just sit there and take it or god will wag his finger at you after you're dead and gone".
I never understood the "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" saying. It's pretending like there aren't selfish assholes (with both eyes) out there striking first and going for the eyes of others. Defending yourself and striking back is going to make everyone blind how exactly?
Because it perpetuates the cycle.
The only way for it to be possible to break the cycle of reciprocal violence is for people to abstain from participating in it, even at the cost of martyrdom.
Completely wrong. Both on a conceptual level and a practical one. On a conceptual level, there is no perpetual cycle of reciprocal violence. Reciprocal violence is a minor fraction of all violence in the world and is never 100% elastic (I.E. some proportion of people decline to reciprocate, so retaliation over time trends to zero), the much greater majority of violence is impulsive/uninstigated.
And on a practical level, advocating absolute pacifism in those disinclined to instigate violence only guarantees the egregious applications of violence only get worse, because that makes anyone inclined to instigate violence the automatic survivors, at which point they'll just keep doing what both came naturally and was successful ever more.
If you want overall violence to go down you want people unwilling to instigate violence over nothing but willing to punish instigating violence with even more overpowering violence, and for those people to be a greater force than the people willing to instigate violence for their own purposes
That's your view. For clarity, I'm going to call you a Heinleinist, an adherent of the theory of deterrence.
Christ's view was the contrary.
I'm not going to argue the merits of the respective philosophies.
I'm just going to emphasize that you CANNOT be BOTH a Heinleinist and a Christian. They are mutually incompatible philosophies. Heinlein tells you to deter. Christ tells you to leave it to god; all men WILL die, and the question is whether you die with bloody hands or clean.
"You're going to die young because you smoked thirty cigarettes a day since you were fifteen. And you're going to go to hell, because of the life you took. You're fucked." -Gabriel, Constantine
"An eye for an eye implies you've severely failed in your efforts to de-eye your opponent. How can someone with no eyes best you and remove your eyes?"
An eye for an eye leaves a one-eyed man and a blind man. And in the world of the blind, the one eyed man is king.
Christ explicitly rejected Exodus 21 in the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5).
You're not a Christian if you cling to Exodus 21. Period.
To be fair this is what I’m telling my daughter. They teach the golden rule at school. I tell her if that kid is going to be mean to her she can be mean back. You start out nice but if it’s not reciprocated, screw em. I don’t want her getting abused her whole life because of this mindset.
Fuck their learning. I don't want them to learn, I want them to finally be punished for all the evil shit they've done. At this point, silencing liberals is a matter of self preservation.
The issue here is that they won't learn. They've already decided that liberty is a liability. They aren't wrong, though.
Liberty is a luxury of the unified.
They absolutely refuse to learn from their mistakes and will instead just double down their way into the next trap. Over and over until they have nothing left-- quite the same as what they wish for their opponents--
These people would go out of their way to water plants during a monsoon
Watching them blame the algorithm for it in the comments is beautiful.
"No possible way a human could have determined our targeted doxxing group is bad!"
Already unbanned: https://twitter.com/RightWingWatch/status/1409625906025488394
Probably, some bot or human drone mistook it for being actually right-wing and banned it, but YouTube corrected this after realizing it was anti-right-wing.
private company!
FREEDOM OF SPEECH DOESN'T MEAN FREEDOM FROM CONSEQUENCES!!
HOW DARE YOU SAY THAT!!! POW POW POW!!!
I guarentee youtube will just use this as an excuse to say "See, we censor both sides", and then silently allow the channel back up.
Like Reddit, who let all the feminist man hate subs come back after promising to purge them.
Surprised they haven't reinstated GC.
Aaaand Youtube already reinstated it.
It took less than a day.
Get the headlines up, most people won't follow up on the story = "big tech is unbiased."
of course they were immediately unbanned.
gotta keep globalist cuck nonsense on youtube. they'll probably start promoting it as an apology.
This is the part where the useful idiots are no longer useful.
Interesting move here, since you would expect both parties to be on the same side. Is there some sort of deep state policy shift going, or is this diversion tactics? Possibly the ‘conspiracy theories’ are so convincing that simply spreading them even with the intent to discredit them is too dangerous.
Looks like they have been unbanned.
Lets just keep reporting their stuff. Honestly, its what they do to us. Even if they probably gonna get unbanned. Its the hassle and fear for a few hours to get unbanned.
https://twitter.com/TheQuartering/status/1409550594298220556
just build your own youtube
They claimed to be in support of exposing extremism from the fringes of the far right. But, when you're stricken with TDS, everything is nazis and Trump nazis.