But by disarming, you at once give offence, since you show your subjects that you distrust them, either as doubting their courage, or as doubting their fidelity, each of which imputations begets hatred against you... I shall applaud him who builds fortresses, and him who does not; but I shall blame him who, trusting in them, reckons it a light thing to be held in hatred by his people.
'Biden added that “no amendment to the Constitution is absolute. You can't yell 'fire' in a crowded movie theater and call it freedom of speech."'
The case where this was used was to shut down the free speech of those opposed to the United States involvement in WWI (later overturned of course). If anything AT ALL has first amendment protection it's speech critical of government action. You can imagine where this goes, "denial of climate change is yelling 'fire' in a crowded theater", "opposing critical race theory is yelling 'fire' in a crowded theater", "claiming Biden has been replaced by a hologram is yelling 'fire' in a crowded theater."
You literally can yell fire in a theater though and it be totally legal... you know when there is an actual fire. It’s the act of causing a dangerous panic for no reason that is the problem.
Like the smoothbrains on the houston sub a year or so back cheering that our county judge straight up fucked the bail system are now looking at the state of things and going "Why did i vote for turner?"
WE TRIED TO TELL YOU RETARDS AND YOU SCREAMED HIS OPPONENT WAS A HWITE MALE!
And they all clapped like good little seals when he appointed a fucking illegal alien to a position of power, and when they were tearing shit apart they were moaning about those bigots that hang out on nextdoor and how this was really sticking it to them. Ugh.
And who's to blame for that? Democrats who defunded the police.
Not only "Defunded the police", but "put gun bans in place" in general.
For example: Chicago. They have a ban on firearms in the city. The city and collar counties have been run by Democrats for decades. Where is there shitloads of shootings and gang violence involving firearms every damn weekend of the year? Chicago!
They (the Liberals) don't fucking get that criminals, by definition, don't care about the law and as such they aren't buying firearms from a reputable vendor, or taking the time to buy 80% lowers and mill them out into ghost guns. They just go down to the corner and hit up Mookie whose brother Ray-Ray knows a guy who knows a guy who can meet you and hook you up with a hot gun that was stolen in a break-in last week. The Liberals know that they only way they're going to get guns under their control in the US is to first take them away from every law-abiding citizen, then criminalize the possession in general. Once they've stripped them from the general populace there will be less chance of armed resistance to anything they might try to put into play.
Which reminds me, I need to check and see if the vendors I've been haunting online have lowers back in stock...
The chad move is for states to refuse to enforce and to refuse to allow the feds to enforce. Forget secession; if we do this right they'll be kicking us out.
Joe Biden just called black America an international embarrassment lol
America itself is an embarrassment cause the retard epidemic we got going on
I guess it takes a national embarrassment to know a national embarrassment.
Better watch out, the law abolishing slavery is an amendment, isn't it?
I guess that's not absolute, either.
Same with the amendment that negated the Prohibition amendment ...
-Machiavelli, The Prince
Thus they built their fortress of razor wire and fencing before they began disarmament.
No installed dictator is absolute either.
... so why not remove the first amendment? Or is he leaving that until he's removed all the guns after scrapping the second?
Way ahead of you.
The case where this was used was to shut down the free speech of those opposed to the United States involvement in WWI (later overturned of course). If anything AT ALL has first amendment protection it's speech critical of government action. You can imagine where this goes, "denial of climate change is yelling 'fire' in a crowded theater", "opposing critical race theory is yelling 'fire' in a crowded theater", "claiming Biden has been replaced by a hologram is yelling 'fire' in a crowded theater."
You literally can yell fire in a theater though and it be totally legal... you know when there is an actual fire. It’s the act of causing a dangerous panic for no reason that is the problem.
Worst hologram ever
And who's to blame for that? Democrats who defunded the police. They are directly responsible for this spike.
They created a crisis and now sell you the solution.
Like the smoothbrains on the houston sub a year or so back cheering that our county judge straight up fucked the bail system are now looking at the state of things and going "Why did i vote for turner?"
WE TRIED TO TELL YOU RETARDS AND YOU SCREAMED HIS OPPONENT WAS A HWITE MALE!
And they all clapped like good little seals when he appointed a fucking illegal alien to a position of power, and when they were tearing shit apart they were moaning about those bigots that hang out on nextdoor and how this was really sticking it to them. Ugh.
Not only "Defunded the police", but "put gun bans in place" in general.
For example: Chicago. They have a ban on firearms in the city. The city and collar counties have been run by Democrats for decades. Where is there shitloads of shootings and gang violence involving firearms every damn weekend of the year? Chicago!
They (the Liberals) don't fucking get that criminals, by definition, don't care about the law and as such they aren't buying firearms from a reputable vendor, or taking the time to buy 80% lowers and mill them out into ghost guns. They just go down to the corner and hit up Mookie whose brother Ray-Ray knows a guy who knows a guy who can meet you and hook you up with a hot gun that was stolen in a break-in last week. The Liberals know that they only way they're going to get guns under their control in the US is to first take them away from every law-abiding citizen, then criminalize the possession in general. Once they've stripped them from the general populace there will be less chance of armed resistance to anything they might try to put into play.
Which reminds me, I need to check and see if the vendors I've been haunting online have lowers back in stock...
'Biden added that “no amendment to the Constitution is absolute. You can't yell 'fire' in a crowded movie theater and call it freedom of speech."'
Despite being overturned and generally a recognized as a bad ruling Schenck v. United States will never stop being quoted by idiots and scoundrels.
That is a short term victory though and does nothing to ensure that your great grandchildren will be able to protect themselves and their loved ones.
I won't pretend to have the answers, and I do as you suggest and ignore the fraud on chief, but passive noncompliance isn't good enough.
The chad move is for states to refuse to enforce and to refuse to allow the feds to enforce. Forget secession; if we do this right they'll be kicking us out.
No, they’ll never openly cede territory or power.
But, if we do it right the federal government becomes so worthless in its ability to enforce its own laws that it effectively has no power.
Time to repeal the 19th! Sleepy Joe gets something right!
Might as well repeal the 17th and 26th amendments while we're at it.
Now, if someone were to start making red flag calls in on black homes in every major Democratic city. Then within a month, this would end.
But unfortunately, it will be angry white liberal women doing all the calls.
welfare state is going bust. mass inflation is about to hit. they have to take the guns right now or things go bad for them.
Yeah, and when the british started taking away privately owned CANNONS, shit got real, didn't it?
Slavery is back on the table, boys.
I'm more excited about the prospect of repealing the 19th honestly.
The 19th is the amendment that doomed America the most.
I would love to see it repealed.
Where the fuck have you been for the last century.
The founders intended Amendments to be part of the Constitution. If the Amendments are not absolute, then neither is the Constitution itself.
And at that point, why should anyone respect the federal government?