The Great Reset mastermind suggests risk assessment brain scans to travel
(www.zerohedge.com)
Comments (123)
sorted by:
This man is utterly batshit insane.
Ever wonder why the globalists wanted to kill the economy with COVID lockdowns? Look no further than what he is openly spouting.
It's a bit amusing to me that we have what amounts to a comic book villain operating in plain sight. I'm practically waiting for him to finish one of his sentences with Hail Hydra. Here:
No, really, this dude is basically The Red Skull!
The Red Skull is actually ultra-based and rarely wrong. His appearances in comics usually have him gathering up a group of people who hate the excess of the modern world and want a return to tradition.
He never hides his stances or what he's doing. Whenever he shows up he'll tell to the heroes face his entire plan and why he's doing it.
The Red Skull is only based in modern comics because they basically made a valid Trump supporting argument for him to be seen as the bad guy. Other than that, he's been routinely wrong.
He explains his plan because all bad guys explain themselves too much. It's exposition.
It is not insanity. He knows exactly what he's doing.
There should be Nuremberg Trials for the elites.
No where near at the same rate.
You're being utterly ridiculous to see the globalist left's hatred of Israel, support of Islamism, and disinterest with attacks on Hasidic Jews, and conclude that this is being done to benefit Jews, but not Globalists and Corporatists who are explicitly stating that it will benefit them.
And Racialists obsess and project that all their enemies think exactly in the same line as them, despite a vast amount of evidence to the contrary.
The stupidity of your argument is that you assert every faction must obsess about Jewish racial preservation and purity the way you would obsess about your own white Wakanda. You fail to see that factions that have Jews within them are not Jewish Factions, but instead could be Factions that contain Jews. It's why you can't, and frankly don't want to, separate Jews from Bolshevism. You can't tolerate the idea that the only primary category of all people is some asserted ethnic group. You can't imagine the idea that a Jewish Communist might be Communist first, and Jewish second. Even if he tells you. Especially, if he tells you.
Instead of recognizing that ideological factions are different because of fundamental ideological differences, you just assert that any difference which doesn't support your narrative is hypocrisy and lies. Your racialism isn't falsifiable, and that's why you think you're right, even though it proves the narrative entirely invalid.
You can watch George Lincoln Rockwell praise Malcolm X for racialism and separatism, while vehemently disagreeing with White Liberals and MLK. You can watch FDR and his cabinet praise Hitler, before going to war. You can watch Fabians admire the Soviet Union, while also trying to keep it from expanding too far West without their consent. You can see with your own eyes that ideological differences can and do surpass other identitarian barriers, but you refuse to tolerate the idea that Jews would be like literally all other human groups in all of human history, and are capable of having significant ideological differences that surpass kin, clan, or ethnic connection. It doesn't even matter if Jews themselves identify with the trope that Jews will argue incessantly and autistically over ideological minutia.
But no, that's all just a "distraction" and "hypocrisy" from the idea that Jews are the most uniquely special ethnic group in human history that is laser focused on racial and ethnic purity, because you need them to be the villain in your narrative about yourself, and you're projecting that such laser focus is the only explanation for why they are alleged to have accomplished so much as a collective.
Imagine unironically using the term "mongrelize"
No, it's that whites just genuinely don't give a shit about it because Racialists aren't harping on about it as a means to power in white communities, while exploiting the white working class with a sense of grievance. Most white people slowly learned that racial protectionism never did shit for them in the first place, especially poor whites. The Progressive Racialist ruling class did betray whites, because racialists always betray the the race they claim to uplift. Every identitarian does. What that identity is defined by is no longer the people within that identity group, only what the identiarian ruler asserts.
Most whites figured out that game decades ago, and realized that the whole thing was a fucking racket that served no one but the people who perpetuated it. You shouldn't be surprised that individualist people, who valued individual liberty, didn't want to buy into collective grievance mongering any longer after doing it for nearly 100 years to the success of no one but that racialist elite, who attacked individual liberty wherever present, and were happy to gloss over all nuance with raw ignorance and generalization. At some point, people want to leave the plantation.
Turns out, whites aren't a weak, fragile, dying race. Seems like they can do just fine as long as Progressives (racialist or otherwise) simply fuck off.
Same thing that works out well for the Chinese and Indians (Asia). Focus on literacy, long time preference, strong family units, strong communal interaction, willingness to participate in any trade, saving money, etc. Considering how IQ changes both in individuals and populations, you can't just rely on some generalized IQ statistic. There's factors that influence it, and those factors can lead to success.
Ask me how I know your racialism isn't build on any reasoned understanding of how life works, and is only built upon your own internalized grievances because the black kids made you mad.
It's the corporatists who want cheap labor, and the racialists who are prepared to use that labor as a political tool. ... Which is why racialists were okay with depressing white American farmer wages by mass importing African slaves. The racialists are doing the same shit you're complaining about, and they'll do it again anyway.
What's hard to refute is entirely unfalsifiable arguments you've constructed out of buzzwords, so that you can back up with useless factoids that you think give you evidence of a grand narrative which isn't based in any reality beyond your own assertions. "Company of their own", an easy way to frame an argument that whites insist upon racial homogeneity, and to prove that you used a marriage statistic.
"Company of their own" is just an insinuation that you understand white people at a deeper level than any common pleb, even more than they understand themselves because you are so wise. But we don't see whites obsessing about race. Whites don't admit to it. Whites instead tend to say and do just the opposite when questioned or investigated. Whites tend to be fairly non racist. Yet you use a marriage statistic to try and distract from the fact that whites are not acting in a racist manner generally, and oppose racialism generally in damn near all studies. You don't ever explain why whites would marry other whites, you only assert it's because they are racist like you. You ignore that the whites you are attempting to tally aren't even asking for white partners. You'll also ignore that you'll probably have a disagreement about whether or not the people who are being classified really are white. You also won't want to extend this to smaller ethnic sub-groups within whites, as you might realize that your racialism argument could also fuel balkanization efforts within white populations.
See, what you've done is committed the exact same mistake that the SJW racialists make, that's why you'll never defeat them. You agree with them in literally every way (you just don't like that what you call "Jewry" is what they call "Whiteness"). You've committed the disparity = discrimination fallacy. You agree with disparate impact theory. If you find a concentration of whites, then it must be because they are racist and focus on racial identification.
Try this on for size. Do you think it's possible for a white person to marry a white person without having an insatiable desire to secure a future for the white race? What would make 2 white people have a family without ever considering race? I'd like to see you try to work that out before going too much further down that rabbit hole.
Racialism doesn't do any of those things, it's one of the reasons the south was left as an effective fucking back-water for 100 years. Racialism and Sectarianism in the South was extreme and lead to extreme levels of violence being normalized. Honor Killings aren't new to the US, it's what happens when Progressives institute Racialism to protect their own interests. The South had a horrific literacy rate, let a lone actually functioning school systems.
And I wouldn't call it "social trust" when that "social trust" can result in a lynching, whether black or white, as a form of Communal Self Defense in the same way that Vaush defended the attempted lynching of Kyle Rittenhouse.
Whites have been a "dying race" for fucking 200 hundred years now. You'd think they'd be dead by now... but golly gee willickers, it's as if that whole narrative is bullshit pushed out by progressive psuedo-sciencetism. It's as if it's all a giant progressive protection racket meant to push centralized power and authority into the hands of an elite few who claim to support the race that's being allegedly oppressed... Just like Black Lives Matter.
But hey, don't worry, I'm sure the National Socialists weren't real Socialists. They were definitely different this time. They were more modern and progressive, that's why Keynes & Roosevelt admired Nazism and Fascism before they decided it was bad for their own power and authority.
This is why you fail. Every time you collectivize, you give Leftists an in-road into your structure. It's why damn near every 'right-wing authoriarian' regime always collapsed into a Leftist shithole, even if the CIA made desperate efforts to try and keep communist governments from taking full control.
We offer you a mirror, and you see nothing.
That's not our fault.
They do not allow minorities in positions of power and if they do it is usually tokenism , they have genetic tests for whether one is allowed to be citizen or not, and its literally in their constitution or basic law that they are to be a "jewish state"
u/SpezTouchesKids
Read everyone else's replies. it doesn't matter if they are not 100% jewish, they have an apartheid, they have laws to define themselves as a jewish state and they have genetic testing for immigrants and they dont allow minorities positions of power unless its for tokenism...
yes it is its literally in their constitution...
"fake news" lol really? In its Basic Laws, Israel defines itself as a Jewish and democratic state and the nation state of the Jewish people
Radical islam was created by these people. That's why the wars were fought...to take out the civilized governments and make way for the radicals. It started with Iran in the 70s.
Not just radical Islam.
Muhammed was kicked out and trained under a Jewish mercenary (bandit) group.
Jews literally created Islam.
Come on that's a leap. They may use it to their advantage, they certainly didn't create it.
No they didnt create extremism obviously. But they have identified it and amplified it and used it from 1970 to around 2012 to create NWO Phase 1. NWO phase 2 is underway and the headline is ChYnUh and Corona lockdowns.
Nope . The ones with the most power, the biggest media and big tech companies and global banks aren't owned by china.
Actually they did, with Wahhabism
That's just ridiculous. Radical Islam is just Islam without the Caliphates to try and moderate the dogma. Nobody told Sayyid Qutb to hate America, he despised it's moral depravity the moment he heard "Baby It's Cold Outside".
Radical Islam is an extremist wing, the same as radical Christianity that resulted in the inquisition.
It's just Islam without hundreds of years of citation, arbitration, and jurisprudence within Islamic law. That doesn't make it the creation of someone else.
It wasnt created by them, its fostered and spread. Globalists have been weaponizing islam for decades. See the Islamic Revolution in formerly westernized Iran. Also see the Communist Kurds and the "rebels" in Syria and Libya. These countries were well totally normal places before the globalists got involved.
These are wildly different factions.
The Shah was the Globalist ally. Not the Islamists. The Islamists and the Communists allied to overthrow the Shaw, and then the Islamists slaughtered the Communists because the Islamists are better at this kind of subversion and betrayal than even the Communists.
It's one of the reason the globalist neo-cons are obsessive about blowing up Iran. The Islamists are not allies unless the globalists can manipulate the situation to benefit them.
Meanwhile the Kurds are not Islamists, they are Communists. They are not allies of the Islamists, which is why Islamists and ISIS forces routinely tried to kill them all.
Islamic countries aren't normal places because of Islam. But barring that, Globalists fuck everything up generally. Not because they control the Islamists.
Antisemitism benefits Israel because a Jewish population that is afraid is likely to run to safety in Israel. A one state solution would not work today because the Arabs would outnumber the Jews. They need more Jews in Israel.
And I assume that the Yom Kippur War also benefited Israel by the same logic.
No wait, that's retarded.
Antisemitism doesn't benefit Israel, because it means they get targeted, and so do all of their citizens everywhere where antisemitism occurs. Their population is fine, and plenty of Jews already moved to Israel.
Of course, the best demonstration of the stupidity of this argument would be to argue that National Socialism is a Jewish plot because of all of it's antisemitism. I suppose all of /pol/ is working for the Mossad.
Are you saying Jews haven’t benefited greatly from their eternal victimhood?
No, they haven't. Nobody really ever does.
Billions in aid and donations (with more on the way), an ethnostate, and special laws providing exclusive protections say otherwise.
Literally all of those things do more harm than good.
You can't spell Ashkenazi... without Nazi.
Checkmate, Atheists.
Schicklgruber
Shekel-grubber
Shekel-grabber
IT ALL MAKES SENSE!
No, it was "Pölzl" dont make things up.
While there is of course sub groups, groups with different motivations, at the end of the day they are all united in the hatred of people of European stock.
So European Jews.
Ashkenazis do not identify as white european (especially not in private).
You can say that, but it doesn't take away the fact that Jews have still been interbreeding and integrating with European populations for multiple centuries, particularly the wealthy & integrated ones of Central and Western Europe.
it literally doesnt matter , they still consider themselves a different tribe (a "chosen tribe") and they follow a , different historical, different lineage and different identity they do not identify with white europeans and see themselves as a separate group(and they generally hate europeans) . Plus they would not care so much if things are messed up in the west cause they can run to israel but no european can.
u/Gizortnik
.... when Jews call themselves "chosen tribe/people" they mean "god's chosen people" meant to lead the "goyim" no one else thinks like this . Second your point about different types of Jews literally just adds to my point that they identify as being Jewish first, . . Ashkenazi would sooner identify with Ethiopian Jews than they would a European, because as i said they follow a different lineage and identity. Aka the shared "Jewish " identity
and i am not "complaining" about the right of return (except maybe the hypocrisy of it to create an Ethno state whilst saying its wrong for others to do so) so much as i am pointing out the fact that it only applies to Jews, it does not apply to European so you cannot keep trying to pretend like Ashkenazi are Europeans cause they are not they do not think themselves as that, they follow a different lineage and identity (a Semitic one) and have their own tribe that they belong to, that is not European. (And they hate Europeans).
You're asserting these things out of nothing. First and foremost: every fucking tribe is the chosen tribe. Every native American Indian Tribe can simply be translated to "People" in that tribe's language. Nobody see's their tribe as "some other not significant grouping of people". The different historical identities of people exist both within and beyond Jews. Not only of Jews of separate Jewish tribes within Jewry, but also every single white European identifies with their ethnic groups. People with Jewish ancestry, like every ethnic admixture, can identify with both, or even ignore one entirely. This is why Jewish Germans were calling themselves "Germans of the Mosaic faith" at the turn of the century. Not to mention you've got this ridiculous idea that Jews hate Europeans, when they themselves are European Jews. Most European Jews, don't even separate their European lineage from their Jewish one, because it's all basically inter-twined. As you would expect from a population of people that has existed in every country in Europe at one time or another, including the countries that don't exist anymore, over the course of well over a thousand years.
You're just complaining about the right of return, which has it's own series of restrictions, and Israel's immigration policy is more than just that.
Jews are just divided as christians and muslims? Do you honestly think all jews get all as well as Catcholics and Puritans? If they did, America wouldn't be made.
I don't understand your question, I think you made a typo somewhere in the second sentence.
Allow me to rephrase it then: Do you think Jews are one monolithic entity without denominations that differ from one another?
No, it's one of the reasons why racism and racialism is useless. It is intentionally reductive.
im agreeing with all the .... lets say not so savory actions (and more) that people are describing in the comment section on what to do with him. i could describe it here but it would probably be deleted for being too graphic
Or pets.
Wetware memory doesn't work that way, dumbass boomer.
This guy is fucking deluded about how far technology can go.
Musk is a good guy, he won't be part of this.
Musk is a technocrat.
He absolutely could be a part of this.
Regardless of whether or not Musk wants to do this, its Pandora's Box. Once the tech is out there, there's nothing to stop someone else from getting and using the tech for some other purpose.
Once the tech exists he won't be able to stop it.
This man wants to scan your brain for wrong think.... He calls it the fourth revolution... Replace revolution with reich more like.
There is no Akane to save us.
Makishima would work too but then we would have to worry about Kogami messing things up
When I first watched the series a few years ago I was rooting for Kogami and Akane.
I also rewatched Season 1 this year and with recent events of the lockdown fresh in my mind I see now that Makishima's methods mayve extreme but he was right about the Sibyl System.
I think more context for that quote is needed. The author writes that the temptation to use such measures would increase. The fact he refers to them as a temptation suggests to me that he is not in favor of them.
Did you not read this part?
"Schwab notes that the use of such technology to conduct mass surveillance and tracking of the population “run(s) counter to healthy, open societies,” yet goes on to present it in a positive light anyway."
So they say. I'd rather see for myself.