The Great Reset mastermind suggests risk assessment brain scans to travel
(www.zerohedge.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (123)
sorted by:
Imagine unironically using the term "mongrelize"
No, it's that whites just genuinely don't give a shit about it because Racialists aren't harping on about it as a means to power in white communities, while exploiting the white working class with a sense of grievance. Most white people slowly learned that racial protectionism never did shit for them in the first place, especially poor whites. The Progressive Racialist ruling class did betray whites, because racialists always betray the the race they claim to uplift. Every identitarian does. What that identity is defined by is no longer the people within that identity group, only what the identiarian ruler asserts.
Most whites figured out that game decades ago, and realized that the whole thing was a fucking racket that served no one but the people who perpetuated it. You shouldn't be surprised that individualist people, who valued individual liberty, didn't want to buy into collective grievance mongering any longer after doing it for nearly 100 years to the success of no one but that racialist elite, who attacked individual liberty wherever present, and were happy to gloss over all nuance with raw ignorance and generalization. At some point, people want to leave the plantation.
Turns out, whites aren't a weak, fragile, dying race. Seems like they can do just fine as long as Progressives (racialist or otherwise) simply fuck off.
Same thing that works out well for the Chinese and Indians (Asia). Focus on literacy, long time preference, strong family units, strong communal interaction, willingness to participate in any trade, saving money, etc. Considering how IQ changes both in individuals and populations, you can't just rely on some generalized IQ statistic. There's factors that influence it, and those factors can lead to success.
Ask me how I know your racialism isn't build on any reasoned understanding of how life works, and is only built upon your own internalized grievances because the black kids made you mad.
It's the corporatists who want cheap labor, and the racialists who are prepared to use that labor as a political tool. ... Which is why racialists were okay with depressing white American farmer wages by mass importing African slaves. The racialists are doing the same shit you're complaining about, and they'll do it again anyway.
What's hard to refute is entirely unfalsifiable arguments you've constructed out of buzzwords, so that you can back up with useless factoids that you think give you evidence of a grand narrative which isn't based in any reality beyond your own assertions. "Company of their own", an easy way to frame an argument that whites insist upon racial homogeneity, and to prove that you used a marriage statistic.
"Company of their own" is just an insinuation that you understand white people at a deeper level than any common pleb, even more than they understand themselves because you are so wise. But we don't see whites obsessing about race. Whites don't admit to it. Whites instead tend to say and do just the opposite when questioned or investigated. Whites tend to be fairly non racist. Yet you use a marriage statistic to try and distract from the fact that whites are not acting in a racist manner generally, and oppose racialism generally in damn near all studies. You don't ever explain why whites would marry other whites, you only assert it's because they are racist like you. You ignore that the whites you are attempting to tally aren't even asking for white partners. You'll also ignore that you'll probably have a disagreement about whether or not the people who are being classified really are white. You also won't want to extend this to smaller ethnic sub-groups within whites, as you might realize that your racialism argument could also fuel balkanization efforts within white populations.
See, what you've done is committed the exact same mistake that the SJW racialists make, that's why you'll never defeat them. You agree with them in literally every way (you just don't like that what you call "Jewry" is what they call "Whiteness"). You've committed the disparity = discrimination fallacy. You agree with disparate impact theory. If you find a concentration of whites, then it must be because they are racist and focus on racial identification.
Try this on for size. Do you think it's possible for a white person to marry a white person without having an insatiable desire to secure a future for the white race? What would make 2 white people have a family without ever considering race? I'd like to see you try to work that out before going too much further down that rabbit hole.
Racialism doesn't do any of those things, it's one of the reasons the south was left as an effective fucking back-water for 100 years. Racialism and Sectarianism in the South was extreme and lead to extreme levels of violence being normalized. Honor Killings aren't new to the US, it's what happens when Progressives institute Racialism to protect their own interests. The South had a horrific literacy rate, let a lone actually functioning school systems.
And I wouldn't call it "social trust" when that "social trust" can result in a lynching, whether black or white, as a form of Communal Self Defense in the same way that Vaush defended the attempted lynching of Kyle Rittenhouse.
Whites have been a "dying race" for fucking 200 hundred years now. You'd think they'd be dead by now... but golly gee willickers, it's as if that whole narrative is bullshit pushed out by progressive psuedo-sciencetism. It's as if it's all a giant progressive protection racket meant to push centralized power and authority into the hands of an elite few who claim to support the race that's being allegedly oppressed... Just like Black Lives Matter.
But hey, don't worry, I'm sure the National Socialists weren't real Socialists. They were definitely different this time. They were more modern and progressive, that's why Keynes & Roosevelt admired Nazism and Fascism before they decided it was bad for their own power and authority.
This is why you fail. Every time you collectivize, you give Leftists an in-road into your structure. It's why damn near every 'right-wing authoriarian' regime always collapsed into a Leftist shithole, even if the CIA made desperate efforts to try and keep communist governments from taking full control.
We offer you a mirror, and you see nothing.
That's not our fault.
On TumblrInAction, I had people get angry at me because I condemned a feminist for saying that because she was raped, she hated men. They told me it was reasonable and justified to have that kind of fear, even if it was irrational, due to her trauma... Like being bitten by a dog, and not wanting to be around dogs.
I say to you, as I said to them, I don't really give a shit what trauma you went through. At some point, you're going to have to grow up and move on. That obsession with your victimhood is doing more damage to you than the initial trauma itself, and if you paper-over that wound with bigotry, I don't have to respect it. It's a personal failure.
No, we're not like you.
No, it's not an evaluation. It's an assertion that you hope to boost your narrative with. The answer to your question is in the previous response.
He's taking up an anti-Anti-Trust argument. That's not a defense of censorship, but he's not going far enough. Silicon valley should be stripped of all of their government funding and legal protections. A giant Anti-Trust action only cull's company's into the behest of government obedience, which we currently have enough problems with... You're in a literal example of the problem with government protected tech.
No, racialism did. Racial protectionism always does. I'm not surprised that Black northerners adopted "Cracker" culture after Racialists couldn't manipulate white southerners anymore, and moved on to groups they thought could be more lucrative.
How old are your parents. The situation dramtically improved after the Democrats lost control over the South.
It shows you didn't read that piece. Worse, you actually think you wouldn't side with the SJWs. All you have to do is change "racist" with "degenerate" and you wouldn't be able to agree hard enough.