You forgot IQ which correlated better with crime that anything else.
As to your theory, it looks to me like whites are underrepresented in mass shootings: https://www.statista.com/statistics/476456/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-shooter-s-race
The everything was totally great some other time some other place myth is a myth.
It's used and repeated by classical liberals to ease their mental dissonance.
Let's say you're a Jordan Peterson / Steven Pinker / Douglas Murray.
The difference between these types and the zombies is that they retain some autonomy. But they still play by all the rules.
So they have the ability to notice some things. Surely there must be a Rational explanation for these hate facts and statistics.
But they must also follow The Science, which is telling them that "this has absolutely nothing to do with biology, and also biology doesn't exist, neither does evolution, not when it comes to humans, don't think too much about this, just no biology, that's it, now be distracted, go away, we're all just totally exactly the same, and the only thing that separates us is how much we've been oppressed, The Science has spoken".
How to resolve this seeming conflict?
Oh I know, they think, it's all because of the government! When the government wasn't giving out any welfare, everyone was totally just great! Just don't go reading no old timey news papers or look up no outdated statistics!
I can't seem to find the answer. Does this guy live literally next door? Bc if yes, then he probably did just make a mistake.
Or does he live 5 miles away?
There was a guy somewhere in Europe who wrote a newspaper article defending the african who raped him, said he forgives him because white guilt or whatever, and pleaded for him not to be deported.
I can't find the reddit thread now but I swear this is true.
Exactly.
- Why have they decided this?
Bc they live in a popularity hierarchy and the people above them express the same affection, and have decided that blacks and gays are in the in-group. The lizard brain of all leftists is spending 60% of its energy trying to come up with ways to please the people above them.
- Why?
Bc the strategy is to form a coalition of the highly nervous and those high on anxiety. That's about 40% of women, 10% of men, plus the minorities.
They're winning bc they're the majority. The majority gets to decide what sort of hierarchy we're playing, the rest play along not to lose.
Social strategy explains so much of everything.
It's why leftists are such idiots. The popularity hierarchy is the defining characteristic of leftist thought, it's the centerpiece in their thinking, the evolutionary feminine drive. And in popularity hierarchies whatever the person above you says is The Truth even if they said something different 5m ago.
For right wingers it's the power hierarchy. They're less groupthinky, because you don't have to agree with people above you in a power hierarchy, you just have to obey.
Then there's competence hierarchies, where truth is a matter of logic, and power if held by the best qualified. Works well in small carefully selected clicks and companies but easily degrades into a popular or power hierarchy as soon as the tribe is of some size.
Soft times promote popularity hierarchies. In hard times, people are drawn to power hierarchies. We live in soft times, this explains everything.
My prediction for the next 10 years:
- The US will get increasingly more degenerate, crime will skyrocket
- A depression will hit
- The ideologies clergy, members of the professional managerial class (PMC) will disproportionately start to lose their jobs due to AI and the depression, and the influence of the PMC will start to diminish
- Pushback against the regime by it's own now down-on-their-luck supporters (the PMC) will weaken it significantly and make it more indecisive
- With more general anxiety due to the downturn and crime, the coalition of the anxious gets diluted at the same time as the PMC start infighting
- A strong man will get to power promising to rid of crime and provide security
- He will use the opportunity of the weakened regime to ruthlessly dismantle the bureaucracy
- This will be the end of the republic
It's not about madeupness, it's about compelled speech. The difference is that the other word definitions you have a say in.
'I don't say "food", I prefer "chow"'.
- 'Oh, ok'.
'I don't say say "cis", I prefer "normal"'.
- 'RRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE'
Hershey's is a chockolate company.
Have you heard of the economics of scale?
You think maybe making a billion chocolates in factories is not the same thing as making, designing, getting FDA approval, marketing, and selling a gag gift that you expect to sell 1000 of?
Banning brainwashing is not enough.
You have to also write things they don't like and force them to remove it, this way they have no upper hand.
I suggest "The virtues of social Darwinism", or "How blank slate theory turned out to be a lie", or "The Bell Curve part 2: It's only getting worse", or "Why believers of moral relativism are evil", or "Ideological contagion and the mass grooming of children".
Quite possibly this is a troll, carefully constructing an argument supporting the idea that there are innate differences between the sexes. An argument that even a redditor would have to allow, surely, by appealing to their sense of justice, empathy, care for victims, and decency.
Nice try, troll, but of course the only thing you miscalculated was in thinking they have a sense of justice, empathy, care for victims, or decency. They don't. It's all for show.
They are vile, and instead they just removed the post immediately, for blasphemy. lol. https://www.reddit.com/r/rape/comments/ztt45v/comment/jambbt8/
Some useful idiot had to remove a post about rape, an apparent cry for help, from a forum about helping rape victims - and really the only good thing that can possibly come from this is that this person suffers from this act and feels unbearable guilt forever. But here I too am making the same mistake as the troll; thinking they have a conscience or a soul. They don't. He doesn't care.
Yours is a losing strategy.
The left got dominant by attacking, never letting go, refusing to compromise even a little bit, and appealing to emotions. They didn't get to where they are by granting anyone any victories, no matter how small.
You should not pay for any entertainment that they like in any way. Any representation, diversity, propaganda, anything, you avoid it and you make sure everyone you know avoids it too. Teach people to torrent or use free streaming sites.
You have to use their words against them, and you can never accept any of their victories.
Left complaining about the right removing books from schools? Then write a book celebrating the history of social darwinism and make them go on the record to ban it from schools.
Left want more diversity in cinema? You make sure their content fails.
Left wants more censorship? Deliberately use the words they don't want you to use.
Left wants you to listen to this or that group? Actively go out of your way to ignore those people.
You do all of this to undermine them, because if they win then you and your decedents will live in a totalitarian woke dystopia under their merciless dictatorial command where they will tear everything down until all that remains is a constant cry of suffering, because in their hearts they are vengeful sadists.
Why did Pope Benedict resign?
Why wasn't this seen as a grave derelict of duties?
Why would he just abandon the responsibility put on him by his peers, and presumably from the religious point of view, from god?
Half the video is about how he's not alt-right.
Who the fuck cares? Why are you so afraid of their smears?
This is why we lose.
Boycotts work because you only need to hurt their revenue by a couple of percentage points before they start to notice.
How hard would this be to make?
I get you, and agree on the principal point about ism's, but racism doesn't even need to mean that you're in favor of your own race.
It's ok and essentially natural to preference your people (we are animals after all), so I'm not making a normative statement, but racism can also just simply mean that you see the world through the lens of evolutionary biology and group selection. Just a positivist theory of anthropology, nothing more or less, no judgement implied.
Like; different peoples exist, and here's some ways where they are different. Simply that.
In our time even this is enough to get you excommunicated, and so you should hold such opinions to yourself. But I bet most people, silently, secretly, notice things - and from their experiences they form their own ideas, in silence.
Racism doesn't mean "hate an individual for no good reason"
It means recognizing that races even exist.
Nevermind the modern usage that means something like "races don't exist but also these good races have been oppressed by those bad races, and the oppression exists to this day and colors everything that everyone does at all times".
You can say that "discriminating on the basis on skin color alone is bad". Ok, that's one thing.
Even though it's natural for people to prefer to associate with others who are culturally and biologically like them. And it's perfectly fine to discriminate, it's necessary even, we discriminate successfully all the time. And skin color is just another data point, with meaning as long as groups with different skin colors act differently on aggregate, which they do, even if you hold that it's bc of some coincidence or consequence.
So maybe "discriminating on the basis on skin color alone is suboptimal, as sometimes it will lead you to avoid a competent or good person" is more accurate.
But as soon as you use the word "racism" you're a retard if you think you're not invoking the vast library of meanings that the predominant culture has dressed it with.
And notice there's no mention of hate, bc noticing things has nothing to do with hate.
The term has been coopted, it's just another brainwashing tool, and you should stop wanting to appease the empire by pointing out how racism is bad for brownie points.
Be concise in your language. Don't use a word that has a clear meaning in the dominant culture idiosyncratically. You can't walk around town with a swastika and claim it's an Indian peace symbol. You have to recognize the words the empire ideology is using to trigger its brainwashed cult members, and either avoid them or subvert them. Otherwise you come off as just another NPC, and modifying it just makes you sound like you're maybe slightly less of an idiot but you're still a fucking idiot.
Why do I even bother.
I heard Yarvin call it the Cult of Overton, and I think that's a very fitting name.
It's clearly a cult.
They are fully brainwashed NPCs, only able to think within the confines of the dogma, an ever narrowing space.
In 2010 they were largely able to think for themselves. Thinking requires uncertainty, it requires openness - the building blocks of which are premises, hypothesis, theories, hypotheticals, etc.
But the cult demands conclusions. Whether that's "the word of God" or "settled science", appeals to authority or "common knowledge", "scientists agree" or "our priest says".
Like cancer the brain virus spreads. The cult demanding an ever increasing list of conclusions. And as the list grows, the space to think shrinks. Until eventually, all that is left is an NPC who just seems to know everything, have a rehearsed answer to everything; an answer that's repeated by all the other cult members. The metamorphosis is complete.
The change since 2010 is due to two things. Firstly that mass psychology, aka propaganda, is a new field barely over half a century old. There have been significant advances in the last few decades. The methods of the clergy class and the brainwashing itself are far more effective. Analogously, the field advanced from blood draining leeches in the 60s to echocardiograms and hip replacements in 2010 - and from that to laser surgery and crispr today. Reminds me of this text that u/Assassin47 shared here yesterday: https://files.catbox.moe/nv38ye.jpeg
And secondly it's social media. Brain viruses need a medium to spread through. Long ago that was conversations in the tribe, then through organized events the city, through the printing press the nation or the empire, and through radio and TV the world. But conversations, sermons, or books; none of it was nearly as effective as social media. Now people are plugged in from they wake up till they sleep, completely sequestered from opposing views, under huge group pressure, in a panopticon that scrutinizes their every word, surrounded by indoctrination on every side.
We're seeing the results and it's remarkable. The complete annihilation of the self - the total transformation of the individual into the redditor.
Then why did he resign?
Having a female black protagonist is not bad in itself
What's the exception?
Leftists are materialists. They just simply can not understand how anyone could possibly make a decision that isn't about increasing their consumption and material comfort.
Why should the Japanese people not flood their homeland with foreigners and erase their own heritage, destroy their own culture, dismantle one of the last high-trust societies on the planet, introduce crime and violence, spend additional billions on welfare, and become second grade citizens in their own land who'll have to walk on eggshells to appease the invaders; when that means they could also afford more junk made in China?
lol omg so stupid, all they have to do is be more progressive and then they can have more junk, but the Japanese too stupid and alt-right, stubbornly missing out on consuming more junk, the losers, lol
$850. Are you dyslexic?
If you mean for a family of 4, then yes I believe that, and so far I'm the only one who has provided a source.
Let's see you put up some evidence that a family of four living on expensive eco groceries spend only $500 in total per month.
What's the most likely, that every metric I've looked up online is wrong and that it costs $4 per person to live off healthy eco food for 3 meals per day as you claim, or $1.30 per meal, or that you're full of shit. Hmmm....
Read that again a few times, I'll let you figure out what's wrong.
The cost of living doesn't include rent, it includes food, amenities, and travel.
The rent is in addition to the cost of living. If you had checked the site you would have seen that's clearly mentioned.
I'm talking to an actual retard.
A teacher in the US does not work twice the hours you absolute braindead loser.
Normal, lol. What does normal mean to you? That it happens? Then anything immoral, murder included, is also "normal".
Look, I am 100% in defense of legal porn.
It makes the people who perform miserable. It makes the people who consume miserable. Yes. But go ahead. As long as no one is forcing you you to do it, or to consume it, then all the misery it brings is simply earned, and therefore just.