Downvoted. No link for context from reputable source.
https://thepostmillennial.com/driver-plows-trump-supporters-blm-protest-california/
Of course not! Under U.S. EEO law, you can't discriminate on the basis of skin color and the like. I mean, not unless you have a carefully thought-out plan on how to do so!
(I'm not joking. That is the letter of the law.)
No, the problem was, it put "intellectuals" out of work.
Normally, those people would have been bookkeepers or government clerks (or court eunuchs). Computers and market economies put those people out of work. Now, they want back in by causing problems with pretty words and then charging you millions for the "solutions."
I didn't vote for Obama but I remember thinking that the one silver lining of his election would be an end to the people who wouldn't shut up about how everything is racist. I have never been more wrong about anything in my life.
lol
I honestly can't say how much of this is Marxism and how much of intersectionalism is Marxism infected by Democrats, who can only pass the most minor legislation without first igniting a class or a race war (or gender war, since the '60s). This has been true since Thomas Jefferson secretly financed a newspaper to smear John Adams and George Washington.
I recommend a good dose of David Cole at TakiMag. He doesn't have any easy solutions for you, but he sees and discusses the problems clearly as tribal tensions exacerbated by politics. He cheerfully indicts those of his fellow Jews whose "solutions" have repeatedly blown up in their faces.
I would scroll down to "Jewicide Bombers" on the above list and read forward in the timeline.
If you like those articles, I highly recommend Cole's memoir, Republican Party Animal.
No. Racism was going extinct among white people. Black people were still having the conversation in the '90s. Al Sharpton, AKA Reverend 911 was still at large.
No. No hypocrisy at all. Standard practice.
Why Thomas? He's the best Justice on the bench. He should have been promoted to Chief Justice.
Amend the constitution to say that State laws overwrite Federal rulings and Federal regulations. (If a State bothered to pass a law on say abortion and the Federal government didn't, then the courts default to State law rather than Starry Decisis or Chevron Deference.)
"I have no idea how the law works."
Undo the nuclear option from 2013. (Bring it back to a 2/3rd majority to moderate the SCOTUS and prevent to the vitriol we have seen from every vacancy since then.)
No. The Senate evil over Supreme Court nominations began with Robert Bork's and (especially) Clarence Thomas's nominations, in 1987 and 1991, respectively.
All of the problems in U.S. jurisprudence stem from three causes:
- Revocation of "loser pays." In the U.K., any legal defense costs past the process of discovery (a pre-trial gathering of information about the case) can be assessed to an unsuccessful plaintiff. The U.S. ended that in the Federalist era, since so many British subjects were suing for lost property during the Revolution.
- Re-imposition of the distinction between "solicitor" and "barrister" in U.S. law. Remember how people complain that the U.S. has 10,000x the lawyers the UK has? That is because the U.S. removed the distinction between a solicitor (who gives legal advice) and barrister (a much more qualified lawyer who can try a case) back when a qualified barrister was hard to find on the frontier. Most U.S. lawyers could be replaced with solicitors, since all they do is file legal paperwork for businesses. The lack of solicitors and the presence of Legal Aid is why poorer people cannot afford decent legal advice.
- The Fourteenth Amendment says absolutely nothing but that each state must enforce its laws without regard to race. That's it. Under Plessy v. Ferguson the Supreme Court declared that of course this meant that states could legally segregate their population by race. Under Brown v. Board of Education, this now means that the government can violate Freedom of Association (again) by mandating integration.
Fix those three laws, and 80% of our problems (tort abuse, access to legal services, massive Federal overreach) will disappear.
This man was murdered by a public prosecutor for crimethink.
In other news, exactly how many morons will continue to create legal defense funds for non-Leftists for GoFundMe/Patreon/Indiegogo and the like to cancel, leaving the alleged beneficiary even more depressed than before? Use SubscribeStar, it hasn't canceled a single conservative/libertarian yet. If you know of any others, please leave a reply.
Nope. He came out for Bush in '04 or something.