That’s actually pretty god damn impressive.

The aggressive monetization and the fact that content was stripped out, like tag team mode, played bigger roles in tanking the game. DOA5 initially went down the same “no, really, this is a serious fighting game” route but managed to succeed despite that.

If it’s the same study they always reference, it also excluded children under 1 year old because then it skewed back to diseases and birth defects as the leading cause. In other words, to get to “leading cause of death” someone had to seriously fuck around with the numbers. And liberals just go and parrot it. But climate change. That’s totally real.

I miss Dead or Alive. :( Why did DOA6 have to be so shit and probably kill the franchise?

Which is also weird, because according to liberals 150% of abortions are due to rape.

It's better than bad, it's good!

As punk should be.

Was there a mass shooting that i missed? Even then, how many people have blacks shot?

Naw. The DSM says it’s not a mental illness. But addiction is still the result of a disease. That’s SCIENCE.

And those fuckwits will bitch and whine but after a stunt like this they kind of had it coming.

Don’t worry, everyone. This wasn’t racism because it was anti-white, and fortunately the liberals have redefined racism so that it can’t be applied to white people.

I don’t remember. Was that just some idiot fan crowing about the biggest opening from a black female director or did Disney actually put out that defense?

And if people don’t like the results they’ll throw “trust the science” out the window.

I’m sure if it was a man and woman engaging in straight sex, it wouldn’t be an “act of love.” They’d probably try their best to imply rape.

But they are trying their damnedest to make sure you don’t have that control anymore.

I'm a monkey.

Right. Origins. I vaguely recall the advertisements having the obnoxious tone of "ACTUALLY Stargate started with a WOMAN" to it. Also, it seemed mildly lore-breaking, like bad fan fiction. On top of this, reviews said it was painfully boring. But we all know Stargate shot itself with Universe.

"Not bothering anyone." Hmm ... somehow I doubt this.

Yes. Science fiction is inherently progressive. It requires an examination of technology's impact on society, or at least a person. War of the Worlds is an allegory for colonialism. Since the English ruled most of the world, it was necessary to introduce a people/technology not from this world to put the English in the role of conquered savages. The "progressivism" there, aside from the political messaging ("see how shitty it feels?") was to examine the impact of the invasion on the British. Star Trek's inherent progressiveness was to look at the impact of technology enabling us to be a spacefaring society. Not just new worlds and new civilizations, but also how it affected OUR civilization. Racial equality, communism, and all that. 1984, in contrast, looked at the way technology could enable tyrants by spying and controlling information. Also communism. The problem is "progressive" has changed from the thoughtful examination of the impact of technology on society to merely "we have gay people in it." Or, in the case of the Hugo's, "we have gay people writing it." That's meta progressivism, where the text is less important than who produced it.

How the hell are those "sci-fi?" Or is whoever wrote that wiki simply lumping fantasy and sci-fi together?

I get that they’re gay, but do they have to constantly be such faggots about it?

AND painted fingernails.

I hate the fact that no matter how retarded an idea we might come up with to mock them, they'll respond with "hey, there's some merit to that."

Clearly. sales were down because there wasn’t enough diversity and inclusion.

BUT WHAT ABOUT GAMERGATE?