The universities can be anti-White and anti-Male for decades, anti-Christian for nearly a century. But in less than 2 months of the students saying stuff Jews don't like we have congressional hearings.
Democraty(TM) restored when proud slut Chelsea Van Valkenburg defeated the lieutenant of Gamergate, Alec Holowka, by driving him to suicide.
With totally Listened and Believed accusations absolutely not contradicted by messages and pictures from Valkenburg's own public Twitter profile contemporary to, an incompatible with, the accusations.
Universities have gotten into not insignificant trouble for attempting to restrict the freedom of speech on campus. Shenanigans such as creating "free speech zones" for example. So some of them go the other direction and try to ensure freedom of speech is respected.
Someone merely saying that any group should be genocided is perhaps borderline but it is not the same as saying "X groups should be genocided, and this is how we will go about achieving it."
The latter incites or comes close to inciting imminent lawless action. That is not protected speech. The former expresses an opinion that is predictably unpopular but popularity does not determine legality.
Sure the universities could have sat around and tried to predict all possible ways a code of conduct rule could be violated and made a list, then had someone study the list and abuse it with one thing not specifically stated on the list, because the list makers failed the impossible task specifying the myriad ways a person could bully a person/group. OR they could just have a simple rule against bullying and consider the context against freedom of speech. A case by case basis. Which is what the 3 presidents said they do when asked by Stefanik. But I guess doing that would treat everyone fairly and we cannot tolerate that. Because jews are beyond reproach.
The universities can be anti-White and anti-Male for decades, anti-Christian for nearly a century. But in less than 2 months of the students saying stuff Jews don't like we have congressional hearings.
Something something, who you aren't allowed to criticize.
It’s not even “who”, it’s everyone but you, this is their insane “hierarchy of intersectionality” at play.
4 of their top 10 stories are about how a second Trump term would end democracy lol
We're so back
BUT WHAT ABOUT GAMERGATE?
Democraty(TM) restored when proud slut Chelsea Van Valkenburg defeated the lieutenant of Gamergate, Alec Holowka, by driving him to suicide.
With totally Listened and Believed accusations absolutely not contradicted by messages and pictures from Valkenburg's own public Twitter profile contemporary to, an incompatible with, the accusations.
Where do they even go from TDS? Full stochastic terrorism?
would just be a return to form for them. they were regularly bombing things up until the 70s after all.
It'll be interesting if Trump gets re-elected. I believe it is theater, but that man is interesting.
If only
Universities have gotten into not insignificant trouble for attempting to restrict the freedom of speech on campus. Shenanigans such as creating "free speech zones" for example. So some of them go the other direction and try to ensure freedom of speech is respected.
Someone merely saying that any group should be genocided is perhaps borderline but it is not the same as saying "X groups should be genocided, and this is how we will go about achieving it."
The latter incites or comes close to inciting imminent lawless action. That is not protected speech. The former expresses an opinion that is predictably unpopular but popularity does not determine legality.
Sure the universities could have sat around and tried to predict all possible ways a code of conduct rule could be violated and made a list, then had someone study the list and abuse it with one thing not specifically stated on the list, because the list makers failed the impossible task specifying the myriad ways a person could bully a person/group. OR they could just have a simple rule against bullying and consider the context against freedom of speech. A case by case basis. Which is what the 3 presidents said they do when asked by Stefanik. But I guess doing that would treat everyone fairly and we cannot tolerate that. Because jews are beyond reproach.