7
mharmless 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yup. They were right, I was wrong.

Adjustments have been made accordingly.

The shame of a tiny minority of adults is an acceptable price for the protection of children. Back in the closet.

24
mharmless 24 points ago +24 / -0

It is a reference to when you see some bullshit study or lawsuit and then go look the person up on wikipedia and find their early life section says 'born into a Jewish household' or some similar variation at a rate which greatly exceeds their less than 2% fraction of the US population.

Once you've noticed that, there are a few possible answers to the question 'why though' that will pretty much decide which kind of right winger you turn into.

47
mharmless 47 points ago +47 / -0

https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-producer-mocked-jewish-employees-lawsuit-alleges-2023-3

"Her lawsuit claims that she and other Jewish employees were repeatedly discriminated against for being Jewish."

Really it is more notable when this kind of thing happens and it isn't one of a very prolific 2% of the population.

4
mharmless 4 points ago +4 / -0

Trannies? Where are the parents? Fifty years ago we'd have had some 'disappearances' already.

6
mharmless 6 points ago +6 / -0

Posted above, but they will not. WA has strict medical privacy laws starting at 13. Your child must explicitly opt in to you seeing anything in their medical records, and medical billing must obfuscate the charges the parents are paying in order to protect that. You can not and will not get an itemized bill.

7
mharmless 7 points ago +7 / -0

This was already legal. WA has medical privacy laws starting at 13, requires only one year of hormones before top surgery, and all this is done on your insurance while the companies are required by law to hide the nature of the bills you are paying from you.

What they have done here is allowed shelters to not bother to tell you when they find your runaway child, if the kid says they're queer or want an abortion, and to enable them to make these medical choices even earlier than 13.

12
mharmless 12 points ago +13 / -1

Wait you didn't have Fisting Fetish Tuesday? Ours was always on the second Tuesday after Penis Inspection Day.

9
mharmless 9 points ago +11 / -2

I mean he's kinda got a point. Batman is the ultimate conservative. Herculean personal efforts that ultimately change nothing because there is no effort whatsoever put into institutional capture. Decades of fighting crime at great personal cost and Gotham is shittier than it has ever been. A few billion dollars into 2nd amendment protections and death penalty for super villains would have solved this ages ago, but its 'not his place'.

The perfect comic version of conservatives conserving nothing and losing every ideological war while keeping their 'principles' intact.

2
mharmless 2 points ago +2 / -0

The initial proposals were on 25k a year. They walked it back to 250k, and now that they got the Court's stamp they'll be moving the line back to 25k with a quickness.

4
mharmless 4 points ago +4 / -0

Windows ME was conceived and launched in just six months, literally just backported a bunch of win2k features onto a win98 base because otherwise there wouldn't be a product launch in time.

And it fucking shows.

9
mharmless 9 points ago +9 / -0

I got a week ban for saying I won't respect pronouns. For violence. Upheld on appeal.

13
mharmless 13 points ago +13 / -0

It is high time these threats were taken seriously and handled appropriately.

12
mharmless 12 points ago +12 / -0

Six million buys a lot of high-quality pussy.

Pay up front, cheaper.

9
mharmless 9 points ago +9 / -0

As opposed to what? Acting like homosexuals abusing children at elevated rates is normal and fine? Pretending they can actually be women? You certainly ought to understand by now that any opposition to these people makes you a mortal enemy, so why would you pull punches?

Conservatives have conserved nothing, and this is why.

No fight in 'em.

9
mharmless 9 points ago +9 / -0

Oh I'm not doing that at all. This was in response to a raging faggot mad that people were talking about fags abusing kids. I posted this specifically to piss on him. Pissing on these degenerates wherever possible is important, so that normies don't view them as unopposed and therefore correct.

BBB - Bring Back Bullying.

8
mharmless 8 points ago +9 / -1

Does 13 do 51 also confuse you then? I'm not sure that I have the space to explain the concept of per capita incidence rates properly.

23
mharmless 23 points ago +23 / -0

I was suspended for tweeting:

Homosexuals are between one and five percent of the population, yet they make up nine percent of the child sexual offenders. They are therefore two to eight times as likely to be pedophiles as the straight population. https://t.co/IJKbLWb35j

After a week in the appeal bucket, I deleted it, had to wait a day on top of it. Then I tweeted:

@elonmusk Linking to a study on pubmed showing that homosexuals have a greater proportion of pedophiles resulted in my account being suspended. The appeal sat for a week, gave up and deleted it, and then I still got silenced for another day to boot. The process is the punishment.

This INSTANTLY resulted in a 7-day suspension.

3
mharmless 3 points ago +3 / -0

This happened early am yesterday, the appeal is still pending. The faggot incident was a few weeks back. I didn't even have a twitter before Musk.

6
mharmless 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thanks for the recommendation. This was already sitting in my library, and has now been bumped to the top.

2
mharmless 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am currently locked out of twitter for this:

@SteveBenedict17 @MiaCathell @MattWalshBlog Homosexuals are between one and five percent of the population, yet they make up nine percent of the child sexual offenders. They are therefore two to eight times as likely to be pedophiles as the straight population.

They marked it as 'hateful conduct', promoting violence against a protected class. Appeal still in process.

Last lock was using the word 'faggot'. I called the appeal team faggots, linked to other tweets by faggots using the word faggot and said that was proof it was only an insult not a call to violence. Expected a ban for calling the appeal team faggots, but just had to delete the tweet still. I then went right back to the thread in question and called for making homosexuality illegal and then punishing homosexuals to the full extent of the law, up to and including lawful state executions. This tweet was allowed to stay up, as opposed to calling somebody a faggot.

The current situation is... weird.

2
mharmless 2 points ago +2 / -0

a normal person who voted for trump is the same as a stormfront white supremacist

How it started vs how it's going

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›