you are yet again incapable of engaging in any discussion in good faith, as you yourself admit in the comment I replied to just above, let me show you how this is done without sounding like a ill-educated teenager who does little else but throw out baseless insults or call people names.
You today:
You being a stormcuck
Most people when arguing try to prove their own side of the argument, not repeatedly back up the other. If nothing else you are consistent in burning your own reputation to the ground and keeping it there.
guy is literally unhinged
That's an impressive mix of copium and projection there given your frequency to go full sperg and rant about things completely unrelated to the thread. As Assassin47 pointed out my reply played off what ForeignInvader said prior, and it's not even the first time such a post has been made because several others have also made the "cohencidence" joke in other threads. However unlike in those threads you decided to go full sperg [again] because someone brought up another group rather than your favourite headmates.
Because you yet again go full sperg you get downvoted through the floor, and you even can't entertain the thought you're behaviour is what leads to this.
It's always some group out to get you so you can act like a perpetual victim, [some might almost say like a woman would - hence why you get labelled as one amongst other things], oppressed by some nebulous entity that is conveniently something you can never actually prove because it helps feed your delusion.
His fans can bot me all they want
Reminder you are one of the few people still active on this site who has been proven to use alts to ban evade. Said proof being your own admission. The few others I can think of are Azure something and Ahaus when he got banned one week and decided to also sperg out in response rather than just sit it out for 3 days or however long it was. But again you accuse anyone and everyone of manipulating engagement because you can't face up to the fact that there are dozens of people on this site that find what you post to be worthy of downvoting.
Homosexuals are between one and five percent of the population, yet they make up nine percent of the child sexual offenders. They are therefore two to eight times as likely to be pedophiles as the straight population. https://t.co/IJKbLWb35j
After a week in the appeal bucket, I deleted it, had to wait a day on top of it. Then I tweeted:
@elonmusk Linking to a study on pubmed showing that homosexuals have a greater proportion of pedophiles resulted in my account being suspended. The appeal sat for a week, gave up and deleted it, and then I still got silenced for another day to boot. The process is the punishment.
Oh I'm not doing that at all. This was in response to a raging faggot mad that people were talking about fags abusing kids. I posted this specifically to piss on him. Pissing on these degenerates wherever possible is important, so that normies don't view them as unopposed and therefore correct.
As opposed to what? Acting like homosexuals abusing children at elevated rates is normal and fine? Pretending they can actually be women? You certainly ought to understand by now that any opposition to these people makes you a mortal enemy, so why would you pull punches?
Conservatives have conserved nothing, and this is why.
I believe you mean “I deliberately contradicted someone’s narrative and posted a source to back it up.”
Why should some random gay leftist be allowed to say shit that ignores—or even deliberately obfuscates—an uncomfortable reality without pushback? What u/mharmless says about the importance or contradicting an untrue claim is correct.
I don't get it. Most child sex offenders are men, but like 30% of the crimes are committed against boys. So the math doesn't work out unless you consider homosexual pedophiles to be "just pedophiles" which is what the left does.
Actually they tend to argue there are no gay pedophiles because if they're pedophile that's an orientation and they can't be gay.
Jesus, man. I’m not trying to start a statistics bout with you. I just want to know what the other 91% is. You quoted someone saying gays make up 9% of child sex offenders. Ok, then who’s the other 91%? Because all that’s left is straights and maybe trans if they’re not counted as gay.
And the 13 do 51 isn’t lost on me. That’s divided up by several races. So get the fuck out of here if you’re going to start defending yourself over a simple fuckin question.
Going to level with you: it's a fruitless endeavor to have this conversation. It just ends up turning into two people, each with their minds already made up, getting mad at words on their screen.
I don’t even want to argue anything. I just want to know what the other 91% is. If I think Fuentes is wrong then I’ll take it up with him, but I doubt it’ll go anywhere because 1) I’m a nobody to him and 2) he has the bigger platform.
Obvious by now? Musk's entire gimmick is that he built electric cars overseas and was only deemed a "righty" because he was building factories in the states. He was about as much of a fence-sitter as daily wire and tim "would you like fries with that?" poole.
As soon as he had to secure financing to purchase the inflated stock, any reform ambitions were knee-capped. Whether Musk a fraud or not, his judgement is unavoidably clouded by external market factors at odds with the product.
Elon seems pretty hands-on with this endeavor, but I don't think it's fair to immediately point the finger at him when action is taken against an account. There is a team that handles bans. While there was a massive purge at Twitter, it's highly unlikely the subversive element had been completely rooted out.
While I'm not fan of the guy, it seems that his being very "in the muck" and personally involved has given the appearance of him personally doing all these things. Which some probably are him, but a majority probably are still some janny.
Musk and Twatter are pathetic and the whole cultural move to have this shitty adolescent toy be the "new public square" is a nightmare we will never wake from. It is a highly effective propaganda tool that both placates and arouses the mob, and that global mob numbers in the millions.
Best thing for everybody is if it went offline permanently and immediately, but that will never happen, so we will witness the further destruction of everything while some of us will be able to comment on it for likes and retweets.
Nobody cares about gay marriage or NFTs. Most normies are still pro-vax, just not pro-forced vax. Trump's position is in line with the normies on this issue.
He promised a big announcement (remember he had already announced he was running again) and gave that shit. Then later he had some policies but of course nobody was talking about it because they were too busy making fun of his SuperTrump NFTs.
I have my personal reasons - Kering Foundation - but even my most ardent opponents should realize that anyone who will accept Kanye after he defended pedophiles and invoked religion and "fighting cancel culture" to do so, is either an opposition operative or an amoral grifter.
I'll just leave this list of the organizations listed as a supporter of this initiative here.
Arabella Advisors - "dark money" Democratic Party group.
Comic Relief - The BBC's main charity, funny how they never mention any of this when begging for cash. I'm pretty sure their involvement here is not legal, the money was collected on the basis that it is received by poor children in Africa, not blown on pushing feminism.
Dutch Government - proxy for the EU? Very strange to see a literal country on the list. I never did like the Netherlands for how it humanizes prostitutes.
Gates Foundation - Melinda...I don't need to say any more about that psychopath.
Kering Foundation - Balenciaga itself.
Open Society Foundation - George Soros, the guy behind seemingly every evil thing.
It's from his Fire in the Sun collection, which was shown in 2018 at the David Zwirner Gallery. I wonder if there's anything to dig into there. I'm not an art person.
We have a pedophilic organization with books by someone who painted mutilated boys in their photoshoots. We have backing from state-run UK charities and literal EU governments. We have Melinda Gates' dirty hands on this, we have Meghan Markle leading their policy.
We have them openly admitting that they want to use trans to change boys, acting according to Solanas doctrine. We have them funding women's movements that push for murderers that are female to be treated more leniently.
All they needed was the SCUM Manifesto in the corner of one of their photoshoots and we would have won "anti-feminism is the only real ideology" bingo.
This is the More Feminine Way.
Who is Kering's biggest supporter? The artist formerly known as Kanye, who defended Balenciaga when all this came out.
Was Kanye a feminist ploy to destroy President Donald J. Trump?
You shouldn't project so hard. Not everyone exists on the furthest extreme possible point of an ideology, which allows them to blend many things together.
The first thing Fuentes did after be was unbanned was name the jew. That's not a cohencidence.
An unrelated cohencidence, plebs! Now look at the prices of eggs over here! 🥚 📈
You being a stormcuck makes a lot of our interactions make a whole lot more sense.
What are you even talking about? It's a meme about current [manufactured] news events being used as a distraction you deranged lunatic.
Come on, you're not even subtle.
He played off the guy above him. Either way not sure why it bothers you.
Probably because it's not "womanman bad" enough for him.
Don't you know the Jeeeeeeews are responsible for Elon Musk's and Twatter's political censorship?
Eliza Bleusteinberg, of course.
I see you're being extra retarded today.
That guy is literally unhinged. His fans can bot me all they want.
The irony.
Me about 3 weeks ago:
You today:
Most people when arguing try to prove their own side of the argument, not repeatedly back up the other. If nothing else you are consistent in burning your own reputation to the ground and keeping it there.
That's an impressive mix of copium and projection there given your frequency to go full sperg and rant about things completely unrelated to the thread. As Assassin47 pointed out my reply played off what ForeignInvader said prior, and it's not even the first time such a post has been made because several others have also made the "cohencidence" joke in other threads. However unlike in those threads you decided to go full sperg [again] because someone brought up another group rather than your favourite headmates.
Because you yet again go full sperg you get downvoted through the floor, and you even can't entertain the thought you're behaviour is what leads to this.
It's always some group out to get you so you can act like a perpetual victim, [some might almost say like a woman would - hence why you get labelled as one amongst other things], oppressed by some nebulous entity that is conveniently something you can never actually prove because it helps feed your delusion.
Reminder you are one of the few people still active on this site who has been proven to use alts to ban evade. Said proof being your own admission. The few others I can think of are Azure something and Ahaus when he got banned one week and decided to also sperg out in response rather than just sit it out for 3 days or however long it was. But again you accuse anyone and everyone of manipulating engagement because you can't face up to the fact that there are dozens of people on this site that find what you post to be worthy of downvoting.
I was suspended for tweeting:
After a week in the appeal bucket, I deleted it, had to wait a day on top of it. Then I tweeted:
This INSTANTLY resulted in a 7-day suspension.
Why you would expect anything resembling a proper discussion on Twitter is your own problem.
Oh I'm not doing that at all. This was in response to a raging faggot mad that people were talking about fags abusing kids. I posted this specifically to piss on him. Pissing on these degenerates wherever possible is important, so that normies don't view them as unopposed and therefore correct.
BBB - Bring Back Bullying.
You know they'd probably enjoy it if you did it for real?
>I was deliberately antagonistic to people on the internet to convince the normies I am right
Why do I even bother?
As opposed to what? Acting like homosexuals abusing children at elevated rates is normal and fine? Pretending they can actually be women? You certainly ought to understand by now that any opposition to these people makes you a mortal enemy, so why would you pull punches?
Conservatives have conserved nothing, and this is why.
No fight in 'em.
I believe you mean “I deliberately contradicted someone’s narrative and posted a source to back it up.”
Why should some random gay leftist be allowed to say shit that ignores—or even deliberately obfuscates—an uncomfortable reality without pushback? What u/mharmless says about the importance or contradicting an untrue claim is correct.
I’m a bit confused. If gays make up 9% of the child sex offenders then who makes up the other 91%?
I don't get it. Most child sex offenders are men, but like 30% of the crimes are committed against boys. So the math doesn't work out unless you consider homosexual pedophiles to be "just pedophiles" which is what the left does.
Actually they tend to argue there are no gay pedophiles because if they're pedophile that's an orientation and they can't be gay.
Does 13 do 51 also confuse you then? I'm not sure that I have the space to explain the concept of per capita incidence rates properly.
Jesus, man. I’m not trying to start a statistics bout with you. I just want to know what the other 91% is. You quoted someone saying gays make up 9% of child sex offenders. Ok, then who’s the other 91%? Because all that’s left is straights and maybe trans if they’re not counted as gay.
And the 13 do 51 isn’t lost on me. That’s divided up by several races. So get the fuck out of here if you’re going to start defending yourself over a simple fuckin question.
Going to level with you: it's a fruitless endeavor to have this conversation. It just ends up turning into two people, each with their minds already made up, getting mad at words on their screen.
I don’t even want to argue anything. I just want to know what the other 91% is. If I think Fuentes is wrong then I’ll take it up with him, but I doubt it’ll go anywhere because 1) I’m a nobody to him and 2) he has the bigger platform.
Lesbians?
Their rate of child abuse is ridiculously high. 23%.
Obvious by now? Musk's entire gimmick is that he built electric cars overseas and was only deemed a "righty" because he was building factories in the states. He was about as much of a fence-sitter as daily wire and tim "would you like fries with that?" poole.
And criticized California politicians for shutting the economy down during Covid
And bought Twitter because he was offended by the conspiracy to "fortify" the 2020 election for the Democrats.
https://nitter.net/Styx666Official/status/1618272098581114882
Everything we've been witnessing is one big show. It's all entertainment.
Unfortunately it's a Netflix production so the cast is all dumb as rocks and the production quality is worse than shit.
By now? Elon was a fraud since he founded tesla.
As soon as he had to secure financing to purchase the inflated stock, any reform ambitions were knee-capped. Whether Musk a fraud or not, his judgement is unavoidably clouded by external market factors at odds with the product.
Elon seems pretty hands-on with this endeavor, but I don't think it's fair to immediately point the finger at him when action is taken against an account. There is a team that handles bans. While there was a massive purge at Twitter, it's highly unlikely the subversive element had been completely rooted out.
While I'm not fan of the guy, it seems that his being very "in the muck" and personally involved has given the appearance of him personally doing all these things. Which some probably are him, but a majority probably are still some janny.
Musk and Twatter are pathetic and the whole cultural move to have this shitty adolescent toy be the "new public square" is a nightmare we will never wake from. It is a highly effective propaganda tool that both placates and arouses the mob, and that global mob numbers in the millions.
Best thing for everybody is if it went offline permanently and immediately, but that will never happen, so we will witness the further destruction of everything while some of us will be able to comment on it for likes and retweets.
The same Fuentes that set up Trump with the help of Kering Kanye.
Poor Trump, he had a lot of momentum with his advocacy of vaccines, celebration of gay marriage, and his NFT collection.
Nobody cares about gay marriage or NFTs. Most normies are still pro-vax, just not pro-forced vax. Trump's position is in line with the normies on this issue.
Almost every single person, including most Trump supporters I saw, thought the NFT thing was retarded.
It didn't bother me, but it was like "y tho?"
Cashing in on a scam?
That was kind of weird to me. They looked like kind of the kind of self-aware, tongue-in-cheek stuff that people ate up in 2016.
He promised a big announcement (remember he had already announced he was running again) and gave that shit. Then later he had some policies but of course nobody was talking about it because they were too busy making fun of his SuperTrump NFTs.
the people who are willing to sacrifice their time and money to get someone elected care about gay marriage
We don't want the kind of people who care about that shit. They're the same kind of people who will demand free childbirth and other tradcon insanity.
So free speech is only for people who stan for Daddy Donald?
Obvious bad faith shills are no use to us.
Anyone tied to Kanye should be considered as a Balenciaga ally.
One of the few times I've agrees with you lately
I don't think it's a very controversial take.
I have my personal reasons - Kering Foundation - but even my most ardent opponents should realize that anyone who will accept Kanye after he defended pedophiles and invoked religion and "fighting cancel culture" to do so, is either an opposition operative or an amoral grifter.
You're just mad that Kanye named the Jew. You aren't fooling anyone.
I'll just leave my somewhat detailed post about the Kering Foundation below.
The Kering Foundation is the charitable foundation of Balenciaga's parent company, Kering.
Their major ideology push is the Global Boyhood Initiative, which is basically a push to demonize masculinity even further than it already is. This wouldn't really be notable if it wasn't for two things - one : Meghan Markle is policy leader for the organization, and two : their partner, Equimundo, which appears to be a feminist shell company and even lists Kering as one of their major backers alongside many other shady left-wing organizations such as Arabella Advisors and the Gates Foundation.
The Global Boyhood Initiative openly admits their goal is to get more boys to be "gender non-conforming"
The Kering Foundation publishes academic style reports for media allies to use to push for more feminism being the right thing for schools as part of the Global Boyhood Initiative. This allows allies of Kering to further launder feminist agendas as reality.
I'll just leave this list of the organizations listed as a supporter of this initiative here.
Arabella Advisors - "dark money" Democratic Party group.
Comic Relief - The BBC's main charity, funny how they never mention any of this when begging for cash. I'm pretty sure their involvement here is not legal, the money was collected on the basis that it is received by poor children in Africa, not blown on pushing feminism.
Dutch Government - proxy for the EU? Very strange to see a literal country on the list. I never did like the Netherlands for how it humanizes prostitutes.
Gates Foundation - Melinda...I don't need to say any more about that psychopath.
Kering Foundation - Balenciaga itself.
Open Society Foundation - George Soros, the guy behind seemingly every evil thing.
SEED Foundation - So, this one is interesting. The SEED project is best known for the paper that introduced the theory of White Privilege. I'm sure someone will correct me on them being the origin, but that paper is the literal largest contribution of this organization, regardless of if you find something obscure mentioning that phrase first.
The UN is listed as a Kering Foundation partner, which is interesting when Emma Watson, chair of the HeForShe feminist hate campaign, is a Kering board member.
The Kering Foundation hosted a #GenerationEquality talk in partnership with the French and Mexican governments in mid-December.
The Kering Foundation says it entirely funds radical feminist UK organization Women's Aid, which pushed for murder laws to be more lenient when women were the perpetrators.
Finally, does everyone remember the Balenciaga photoshoot? Well, if you don't, there was a book by Michael Borremans on the desk.
What is Michael Borremans' most famous piece? Well, it's a boy painted suffering with limbs missing...which is pretty much every feminist's fantasy. - Highly NSFW link, and not in the fun way.
It's from his Fire in the Sun collection, which was shown in 2018 at the David Zwirner Gallery. I wonder if there's anything to dig into there. I'm not an art person.
Well, I pulled up his OpenSecrets page. Lots of Democratic Party donations, but that's not out of the ordinary for a resident of NYC.
So, just to recap :
We have a pedophilic organization with books by someone who painted mutilated boys in their photoshoots. We have backing from state-run UK charities and literal EU governments. We have Melinda Gates' dirty hands on this, we have Meghan Markle leading their policy.
We have them openly admitting that they want to use trans to change boys, acting according to Solanas doctrine. We have them funding women's movements that push for murderers that are female to be treated more leniently.
All they needed was the SCUM Manifesto in the corner of one of their photoshoots and we would have won "anti-feminism is the only real ideology" bingo.
This is the More Feminine Way.
Who is Kering's biggest supporter? The artist formerly known as Kanye, who defended Balenciaga when all this came out.
Was Kanye a feminist ploy to destroy President Donald J. Trump?
Is Kering behind all the Nazi shills on this website? We know Kering partners with organizations that use shills to push women's viewpoints on the Internet.
Oh and by the way Kanye has 100x more balls than your orange man ever will.
Again, how can you reconcile being MGTOW and being a stormfag?
You can know both the truth of bitches and jews you know that right? I know its hard to recognize patterns with your low IQ but try hard!
and then there's the venn diagram of Jewish bitches
No, you can't. They are incompatible belief sets.
You can't simultaneously believe women are naturally awful people and that the Jews brainwashed them.
You shouldn't project so hard. Not everyone exists on the furthest extreme possible point of an ideology, which allows them to blend many things together.
LOL. Your orange hero is pathetic just like his supporters.
You realize that Fuentes, Kanye and all of their ilk would enslave us to women for the glory of the white race and other such BS?
These people are our enemy.