He should sue for years of unpaid rent and utility bills
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
No man is going to marry if this sort of thing is possible.
Sowell points out that you can't just arbitrarily adjust a contract to benefit one party. This will affect the willingness of the other party to make contracts. He gave as an example the way blacks are benefited by excessive protection under anti-discrimination laws (which lessens the willingness of businesses to hire them), but it applies equally well here.
Courts have been invalidating pre-nuptial agreements for years. It's not news. All it generally takes is for the agreement to be "unfair" to the woman. It's well-known in MRA and MGTOW circles.
"MRA and MGTOW circles" make all sorts of claims though, and many of them have a professional victim complex. This is pretty outrageous.
This is standard, dude.
There's a case from Ontario a few years back where a wealthy Toronto man wanted to marry a woman he'd been seeing for 15-20 years, and sought her agreement to a pre-nup and/or marriage contract before proposing. They were not living together. She used his request for a pre-nup to break up with him, then subsequently sued him for spousal support while arguing they had been common law spouses. I repeat, they did not share a living space. They also didn't have children together. She won... a paltry $50k per month for 10 years.
Edited some mistakes.
Here's a quick link to a story on the case.
Six million buys a lot of high-quality pussy.
Pay up front, cheaper.