They'll spend all their time doing the same thing I'm doing
Of course. Physical attractiveness is important. It's one component for our instinct to determine fertility & fitness for reproduction which is of course the entire reason for our existence. We like young attractive fit women because instinctually that means they are fertile and will produce fit offspring.
Personality is important for long term relationships, not necessarily the ability to reproduce, but certainly it is important to establish stability and an environment for raising a family.
It sounds like you're going more for sex than a relationship and have set your sights on low hanging fruit, not that I'm judging, just analyzing.
women are shallow and base their preferences on social status, materialism, and looks
Exactly. She's literally projecting her shallowness onto potential mates. She's the one who is not going to have a relationship if she doesn't find the men in her life immediately attractive.
Sounds like my coworker. She's not that attractive, but moreso because she takes so little care of herself and presents an image that drives people away. Her profile picture is straight hair died red (red in nature always means danger), horned rimmed glasses, no makeup with pale skin because it looks like she never goes outdoors, in a t-shirt. Oh and she has 5 cats.....in a single bedroom apartment. Can you imagine the smell? Oh and no social skills: she often takes comments not directed toward her as insinuating she doesn't know a topic and then over-compensates.
I'm not particularly hung up on makeup or looks, but there are looks that say, "I care about myself" and looks that say, "I have zero self-esteem". Low self-esteem people are dysfunctional in many ways. They're essentially project boats. You're going to dump a lot of time and money into them with little return on your investment.
It's not going to stop until you can no longer distinguish the US from any communist country.
I actually don't mind the show. Yes it has mtf trannies
Are you a faggot?
Aloha snackbar, not surprised.
Occam's razor: Maybe he prefers gay bars because he's gay?
The black female leads are portrayed as heroes. The white male leads are portrayed as antagonists. Not sure how you can interpret it any other way.
Thanks for providing that. Not sure what to make of it. It's more accusation pawning itself off as evidence as far as I can tell and a lot more drama than I want to get involved in.
Imagine getting mRNA vaccination for smallpox today....you can still get it, still get sick from it, still transmit it, but fuck you for questioning the vaccination.
I can't compare it to the books since I've not read them, but the theme in the first three episodes is definitely PC and racially based. You have the old empire that is controlled by a white patriarchy prophesied to die and the heroes are two black women from unprivileged origins who acknowledge that it cannot be saved, only changed.
It's a message that is all too similar to other modern envisionings of our ethos of heroes: death to whitey, especially white heterosexual men.
Like in West World, all the women kill all the men, Mad Maxx when our hero spends half the movie shackled and gagged, Star Trek Discovery when in the first 15 minutes of episode 1 the black klingon tells the white klingon that his color is a problem for him, The Last Jedi when Solo is killed off and the only white character that everyone wants to be a hero is side lined by feminist ideologies.
I would be so thankful if you could point that out to me because I can't seem to find it.
I needed to go into the lion's den
Gupta comparing himself to a biblical hero saved by divinity while comparing Rogan to death.
At a time when there is a desire for shorter, crisper content -- responding to abbreviated human attention spans -- one of the most popular podcasts in the country features conversations that last exceptionally long and go particularly deep.
CNN lauds the short attention span as the public's need and desire in order to minimize Rogan's success for feeding the public's need for exactly the opposite.
Many friends cautioned me against accepting Joe's invitation. "There is little room for reasonable conversations anymore," one person told me. "He is a brawler and doesn't play fair," another warned. In fact, when I told Joe early in the podcast that I didn't agree with his apparent views on vaccines against Covid, ivermectin and many things in between, part of me thought the MMA, former Taekwondo champion might hurtle himself across the table and throttle my neck.
Holy shit, Gupta is a piece of work here, literally slandering Rogan's character setting the stage for the rest of the article.
I wanted to know: Was Joe simply a sower of doubt, a creator of chaos? Or was there something more? Was he asking questions that begged to be asked, fueled by necessary suspicion and skepticism?
Modern journalists only ask questions to interject statements to influence the reader. You'll notice Gupta does not ask any questions about his network's characterization of Joe's medically prescribed ivermectin as "horse dewormer". In fact, during the podcast Gupta even validates CNN's mischaracterization when he affirms that ivermectin "is used as a horse dewormer".
Despite a downplaying of Covid risks often heard on Joe's podcast, his private studio prioritizes safety. A nurse was present to perform a rapid Covid test before we began. We were even checked for the presence of antibodies with a finger prick blood test.
That's rich. Criticizing Rogan's observance of safety while using it to criticize Rogan's experience with covid and his questions about the vaccine.
It bears repeating that no one should choose infection over vaccination...Just in the last three months, there have been more than 90,000 preventable Covid-19 deaths in the US among unvaccinated adults
And yet this document from the cdc indicates there has possibly been at least 150K deaths since the vaccine began it's roll out.
I guess a small part of me thought I might change Joe Rogan's mind about vaccines.
Can't change a man's mind when the smell of your bullshit is permeating every surface.
Gupta is a diversity hire who will goose step your ass into the gas chambers to protect his good fortune.
Are you sure? I've looked at some of his post history and it's pretty based. Or are you just saying that to discredit someone with a point more valid than your own? I see this time and again. I get called a shill all the time for not going along with rhetorical bullshit on this site that has no basis in reality. It's like bizarro world reddit;same bullshit just the mirror opposite.
Apparently the threshold for lockdowns in Tasmania is one case. This is effectively what Fauci said in March of 2020 when he was asked when the lockdowns will end and he said when there are zero covid cases. What's disturbing about that comment is the fact that the human race has never entirely eliminated any time of viral infection to zero cases in its entire history and exactly no news outlet ever questioned Fauci's judgement on the matter.
Then you look at the restrictions in Tasmania and the entire island state is essentially a fucking prison: No visitors to homes allowed. Leaving home only allowed for emergency food shopping, caring for elderly/disabled, "permitted" work, outdoor exercise 2 hours a day, valid doctors appointments.
Holy shit! Never give up your guns folks. It's the only reason the US hasn't turned into a despotic state like Australia and its territories.
Reddit is not an organic discussion of topics. Reddit's sole purpose now is to influence the reader's opinions. It has joined the MSM.
I've watched the first 3 episodes of Foundation. It's literally an analogy for the death of European culture and the the rise of black feminist culture. Stopped watching it.
Gupta is literally a diversity hire.
You can screenshot it. Install nimbus capture on your browser or a similar extension. It makes capturing the whole page easy.
We're all here because we've either been harassed off of or booted off of other sites for the crime of wrongthink. Many of us don't want to give traffic to sites like instagram, nor do we want to reveal our identities to it. You're going to get much more attention if you go the extra step of allowing us to see what you're posting.
There's no centralized record of wokeness. However, many companies will freely advertise the fact that they are woke.
A friend of mine wanted me to buy a game. I forget the name of it, but it was an EA game, a FPS with a WWI theme with a black guy on the cover. I already knew but I enjoy playing games with the guy. Bought it. Installed it. Ran it. Right away they advertised their support for BLM. Uninstalled it. Got a refund.
Here's a not exhaustive list of woke donors: https://www.forbes.com/sites/isabeltogoh/2020/06/01/corporate-donations-tracker-here-are-the-companies-giving-millions-to-anti-racism-efforts/?sh=6d299e1f37dc
Many of us refuse to create Instagram/Facebook accounts. Others of us have an account but are using communities.win over vpn to protect ourselves from the crime of wrongthink and so will never log in to see your post. You should archive it and then re-post it.
Maybe they should be judged on their qualifications? No, that's white privilege. Merit? I need to stop being racist. Let just choose them on the color of their skin and the shittiest shithole country from where they originate.