73
Comments (47)
sorted by:
50
WhoIsThatMaskedMan 50 points ago +50 / -0

We're super gender diverse

+

The leadership is all women

In the same sentence.

How do you write something like that without your brain overheating from the doublethink?

15
konoplya 15 points ago +15 / -0

one word: cunts

6
AlwysHideUrPowerLevl 6 points ago +6 / -0

Implying they were all biological women

2
Left2Right 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s not the dictionary definition of diverse, they went with the woke one.

1
novanleon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Diverse = not white, male or Christian

33
Smith1980 33 points ago +36 / -3

As long as they keep thinking that diverse = good then they will always fail. Diversity is neutral. Can be bad or good. And obsessing over it definitely is a path to failure

30
tobeornotto 30 points ago +31 / -1

Diversity is always bad.

Accidental diversity is neutral. If you make choices with absolutely no regard for inclusion, and only pick the best people and the most true-to-the-story ideas, and you unwittingly end up with a diverse team, or diverse characters which make sense in your story's setting.

But we all know that's not what Diversity means to these people. You know it's no accident that they ended up being "led by women at almost every corner".

They'll keep failing, because their theory that anyone can do anything equally well is wrong.

14
Smith1980 14 points ago +14 / -0

That’s what I meant. That if you choose the best writers and some are women or minorities then fine. But if you do like they are and only choose women regardless of talent. Definitely a reason for failure

7
BringTheCat789 7 points ago +8 / -1

Forced diversity is good. You want a diverse group on your team.

But diversity in talents and skill-sets, not diversity of random traits like race and sex; that would just be retarded to force.

2
ThatsAlright 2 points ago +2 / -0

not diversity of random traits like race and sex

Reminds me:

There’s a common argument that what you’re born as — your race, ethnicity, sex — to whom you’re born to, and which country you’re born in are all accidents or circumstances of birth, things that are outside of our control and thus should be irrelevant; nationalism is cringe, and why would you care about your ethnicity or race? What does it matter what skin color you are, and if you think it does, isn’t that basically racism? What matters and should matter is the individual.

However, such notion of individualism is less a reflection of reality and more a reflection of ideology; to be more specific, it’s an attempt to construct an identity based on liberal ideology, an identity free from heritage, belonging, and being, which is best described as rootless individualism. And I’ll explain why.

First and foremost, we don’t simply come into existence out of nowhere and for no reason at all. Each and every individual in existence is a product of specific people, who made specific choices, took specific actions, had specific experiences, including trials and tribulations they went through in their lives, all of which eventually led up to the making of and birth of the said individual.

All of their actions, choices, and experiences themselves were dependent on and conditioned — both socially and genetically — by their parents, ethnicity, race (itself a form of extended family), culture, society, nation, as were those of their parents, those before them, and so forth. Who we are as individuals is, fundamentally, a part of and a product of other people and specific people at that; such individualism can be described as a form of relational individualism.

https://scarletnight.medium.com/the-case-against-racism-25ae8435f47f

10
blyat56 10 points ago +10 / -0

If you look at the actual list of writers, directors, and other personnel, it's...not very diverse at all. The guy who played Y was just about the only man involved in the production.

1
PostyMcGee 1 point ago +1 / -0

Diversity is not neutral, it's bad when it comes to race, and usually gender too, religion as well. No Diversity is bad when it comes to core things like that, within a human society anyways. Biodiversity is good though...

2
Smith1980 2 points ago +2 / -0

I meant in an entertainment sense. I don’t like seeing critics praise a movie based on the number of women or minorities. As for my life I have friends of different races and get along great with them. Now if people only want to associate with their race they should have the freedom to do so.

1
PostyMcGee 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, quota praise is pathetic. But granted your friends of different races it is inevitable. In the end, those friends are slowly destroying white nations demographically. And if they're doing so, are they friends at all really?

1
Smith1980 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have some white ancestry but I’m mostly black. I’ve found good and bad people come in all races. Are there cultural issues? I see the anti white agenda clear as day and don’t understand why western countries are constantly apologizing. But honestly as a Christian I try to see everyone as my brother and sister. Yes I may be naive but I look at how the person is. You should be free to associate with whoever you please.

22
blyat56 22 points ago +22 / -0

Wow, I did not expect that. Their internal data must be showing it as crazy unpopular, even more so than it appears to be.

Second wokest show of 2021 after Scenes from a Marriage. Least gender diverse production in the history of TV. Canned by the audience and canceled after the first season. Good job, ladies!

8
Featherless_Biped 8 points ago +8 / -0

Huh, I figured I was the only one here that saw Scenes from a Marriage. What a cuck show that was.

6
NataliePortmanteau 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yet another adaptation of a masterpiece ruined by the woke mob.

Watch the original, it's great. It's like 6 hours long but great. There's a shorter 3 hour version, as well. One of Ingmar Bergman's best.

4
blyat56 4 points ago +4 / -0

Does he literally get cucked at some point? I bailed within two episodes but everything screamed that it was coming.

The corpo rat woman and the sad soyboy husband, big oof

12
Mpetey123 12 points ago +12 / -0

Led by women, explains the cancelation

12
Smith1980 12 points ago +12 / -0

Anyone read the original graphic novel? I heard it wasn’t so bad but the time we live in is the worst time to adapt it. I heard the same about Handmaids Tale book.

14
TheChumbaWumbler 14 points ago +14 / -0

Handmaid's Tale isn't a bad read. The prose is well written and the character, while being "feminist", is interesting, genuine, and provides a deep, believable point of view. My biggest complaint with the book is that most of the story is told in narrative summary or hectic flashbacks. Not much happens in real time.

As for Y: The Last Man. The protagonist is the typical weak, bumbling idiot, you see in most modern media, but the female characters are all deeply flawed and the world turns into a hellish dystopia when all the men die. Don't take my word for it though, I read the series years ago and when I wasn't as red pilled as I am now.

8
Javaed 8 points ago +8 / -0

I read it years ago. It isn't terrible, but it isn't all that great either as a story. The ending in particular is rushed and non-sensical and you'll find a ton if typical liberal BS.

High level, turns out the virus was created by the planet itself due to over-population / pollution. All creatures with y-chromosomes die except for the protag and his pet monkey, but some mammals spontaneously start having babies anyway. Main character winds up never having kids b/c his love interest gets sniped out of nowhere in the last issue and he's just so sad for the rest of his life. That's ok, we cloned the couple of astronauts who were in space (so they survived the virus) along with a few women and have a thriving utopia now. The end.

6
Smith1980 6 points ago +6 / -0

Ok. Thanks. I think I’ll pass.

2
Aga_Mbadi 2 points ago +2 / -0

I refuse to consider Agent 355 as Yorick's love interest, since that was only forced towards the end of the story.

His girlfriend, Beth, is the impetus for Yorick's adventures, and I was pretty pissed when Yorick broke up with her just because in the beginning of the story, Beth was considering breaking up with him.

Also, just like in The Walking Dead comics, it was never really established why all the males died off, all of the explanations are only theories.

It's a good read for me, the "liberal angle" as seen by some is blown out of proportion. Feminists criticised Y: The Last Man for daring to postulate that women would be lonely (or even less efficient) in a world without men. I just don't really like that Yorick rejected Beth in the end, that was petty.

4
AboriginalIvory 4 points ago +4 / -0

I didn't care for it. I found it a feminist wet dream.

11
throwawayaccount2037 11 points ago +11 / -0

I wouldn't completely count this one out, because there's still Netflix and Amazon, two mega-woke giants who might end up picking up the series and extending the disease even further than what they achieved (or failed to achieve) on Hulu.

3
MasksAreChildAbuse 3 points ago +3 / -0

Netflix probably will as they look to get the “muh diversity” news headlines again after having to fire one their hamplanets the other day.

8
Featherless_Biped 8 points ago +8 / -0

Lasted longer than I thought it would. That's what happens when you take a nuanced and thoughtful take on sci fi and let a bunch of feminists wipe their vaginas with it.

Amber Tamblyn can lick my taint, btw.

12
Daucus9 [S] 12 points ago +12 / -0

Y: The Last Season

6
Vegi 6 points ago +6 / -0

I remember years ago I checked out the first issue of the comic and they were shitting on republicans. So i didnt follow anymore than that. Guessing cutting out jalf the population and then cutting the remainder in half doesnt make for a big audience.

6
IJWTPFVG 6 points ago +6 / -0

the showrunner reminds you exactly why it was cancelled

6
AboriginalIvory 6 points ago +7 / -1

They tried to do a show in Canada about if a gender was gone in a town. They managed to do one with women, as soon as they tried with men the town would collapse as men worked in all keep operation positions (Lives in actual danger). Y the last men was stupid because they only looked at the supposed glass ceiling but not the glass coffin. The only thing they got right about that show was a quote "with out men there is no future".

The comics were kinda shit too, birds of a feather flock together. Shit book with a shit show.

Women are delusional to think that if men disappeared they would be able to exist.

2
ah_hell 2 points ago +2 / -0

Check out Bear Grylls The Island. One season they did separate camps one with men only and one with women only. You can guess the results.

2
AboriginalIvory 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seen it. It went as about as one would expect it.

4
OBRIENMUSTSUFFER 4 points ago +4 / -0

I tried to read it when I first heard the premise but when I found out it wasn’t a porn comic I immediately lost interest.

4
slimcoat 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's based on a comic from 2002 that managed to be way ahead of its time when it comes to progressive stupidity (I read the first issue, couldn't stomach any more). It should have been called "Y: The Last Male" because the main character is in no way a man.

What's funny is that even then it's not good enough for progressives -- they crapped all over it on Goodreads.

2
ukulele 2 points ago +2 / -0

Showrunner:

"Y: THE LAST MAN is about gender, about how oppressive systems inform identity. We had a gender diverse team of brilliant artists, led by women at almost every corner of our production. Producers, writers, directors, cinematographers, production design, costume design, stunt coordination, and more. It is the most collaborative, creatively fulfilling, and beautiful thing I have ever been a part of. We don't want it to end."

1
acp_k2win 1 point ago +6 / -5

I actually don't mind the show. Yes it has mtf trannies but they make sense in that setting.

The best part about the show is how they admit, probably without realizing it, that a world that lost the men would quickly devolve into a post apocalyptic hellhole. While a world that lost all the women would probably go on like normal.

16
icockmyglock 16 points ago +17 / -1

I actually don't mind the show. Yes it has mtf trannies

Are you a faggot?

13
GoldenPlains 13 points ago +13 / -0

How does it have mtf trannies? Didn't the virus(?) kill off all the men?

8
acp_k2win 8 points ago +8 / -0

er typo ftm

3
FlauntandStraunt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Isn't there an Amazon gang that kills them though?

3
blyat56 3 points ago +3 / -0

For real on the second point. It is wildly optimistic.

1
novanleon 1 point ago +1 / -0

It would only go like normal for a decade or two at most, but society would soon begin to fall apart unless somehow the men could figure out how to bring women back somehow (e.g. via cloning).

Being unable to reproduce is a huge drawback to survival.

Also… as a man, life would be kinda lame without women.

1
realerfunction 1 point ago +1 / -0

weakness

1
MegoThor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow, how could it have failed?