posted ago by exclf ago by exclf +37 / -0

Is there a simple way to check the developer and publisher against a list, or do I have no option other than investigating each one personally?

Comments (15)
sorted by:
Lurker404 12 points ago +12 / -0

The old OneAngryGamer (before the site got taken over) had a fairly long list of BLM supporters: https://archive.is/Ri2uX

I generally avoid big AAA publishers. With all the woke shit and microtransactions their games are crap anyway. Maybe when some gold/complete version of their older games goes on sale at 80% off or more I'll buy it (on a 3rd party store).

Other than that I give a developer's/publisher's social media and homepage a quick once-over before I buy a game. The woke are usually all too happy to brag about it.

Galean 12 points ago +12 / -0

My advice is find a game that you like and then investigate. If they turn out they donate to BLM just pirate it.

HypJii 7 points ago +7 / -0

that's basically what I do with music now. If I find out they're whacked out lefty cucks I just pirate their albums

icockmyglock 11 points ago +11 / -0

There's no centralized record of wokeness. However, many companies will freely advertise the fact that they are woke.

A friend of mine wanted me to buy a game. I forget the name of it, but it was an EA game, a FPS with a WWI theme with a black guy on the cover. I already knew but I enjoy playing games with the guy. Bought it. Installed it. Ran it. Right away they advertised their support for BLM. Uninstalled it. Got a refund.

Here's a not exhaustive list of woke donors: https://www.forbes.com/sites/isabeltogoh/2020/06/01/corporate-donations-tracker-here-are-the-companies-giving-millions-to-anti-racism-efforts/?sh=6d299e1f37dc

LauriThorne 9 points ago +9 / -0

That game came out years before BLM was in the limelight and I don't remember anything like that when it came out. They went back 4 years later and added that shit in?

SupremeReader 6 points ago +6 / -0

Battlefield 1

The new COD (WWII) also has a black guy on the cover and all promo imagery, with a chick behind him.

Gamerarch 6 points ago +6 / -0

It doesn't sound like you're specifically interested in them, but I'd advise just going back to older generations to replay games or check out ones you missed out on at the time. I've been doing that lately with things like my Vita, Dreamcast and others, leaving zero chance even a dime is reaching the original developers now. The best part about consooming those older games is that they're often more creative and utterly devoid of modern trappings like season passes, rehashed content and microtransactions.

Just my two cents.

lgbtqwtfbbq 5 points ago +5 / -0

This along with trying to buy games used (to the extent that's even possible anymore) gets you a long way. I've been burning Dreamcast games like crazy, bought one of those N64 cartridges that plays ROMs from an SD card, modded my PS2 with a 1TB hard drive so I can play whatever I want. It's gotten to the point where I almost have too much choice of what games to play. But I also find some real gems when I just randomly try shit (eg. Gladius on PS2).

When people were bitching about the latest RE4 remake, all I could think was "why don't you just play RE4? Or the remake they made in 2014?"

throwawayaccount2037 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think it's been updated anywhere else or I don't know of any other lists quite like it, but there is the traitors list for all the companies that supported BLM: https://archive.is/4PFj8

I guess you could just search up the name of the company and see if they support the looters, rapists, and thugs.

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
dzonatan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Japanese game devs. And I dont mean localised products. I mean products gotten through PlayAsia.com

And if that doesn't fancy you then just go emulation. There's more PSX/PS2/GBA games out there than your life span can cover.

free-will-of-choice -14 points ago +1 / -15


The funds (from fundus; foundation) of usury represents ignorance towards value/evaluation aka balance/choice. As long as the many consent to suggested value (money); have the parasitic few access to unlimited funding (ignorance by the many).

ZeroPercentCamoIndex 8 points ago +8 / -0

You already came out of the closet, you retarded schizo idiot, what's the point any more

free-will-of-choice -6 points ago +1 / -7

Just checked the post history of "Haterjuiced" ...hilarious. A drive by agitator; whose attempt to mimic me was literally the longest (two whole sentences) post he made in months.

free-will-of-choice -9 points ago +1 / -10

What's that? I got myself a mimic; let's check this out...

RETARD, verb, "To make slow or slower; obstruct in motion or progress; delay; impede; clog; hinder."

RET'ARD, verb transitive [Latin retardo; re and tardo, to delay, tardus, slow, late.] - "to diminish the velocity of motion". Now ask yourself...can form (life) diminish the velocity of flow (inception towards death) aka slowing flow down; or is it that the struggle to resist flow as form is what grows potential of form to resist flow?

If I throw a ball (velocity causing momentum); then the ball cannot slow down the source of velocity (me); only resist the consequences of velocity upon itself; hence falling down.

Retardation stems from an impedance of flow in the ONE, leading to a loss of reason (true versus false).

IMPE'DE, verb transitive [Latin impedio] - "to stop in progress"...form within the momentum of flow cannot stop the progress of flow; since it represents a reaction to it aka out of flow.

Also; flow represents ongoing loss for the temporary growth of form within; while reason represents a conflict caused by ignorance of flow in exchange for consent to the suggestions of other form. Flow demands adaptation from form (choice of need); other form tempts ignorance thereof (choice of want). The conflict between true vs false (reason) is therefore based upon the ignorance of need; which causes the conflict between wanting vs not wanting the suggestions from others.

Notice how the ONE who acts by free will of choice is not obstructed by the conflict of reason.

ONE (choice) represents a re-action to ALL (balance); while acting implies performing aka originating from (per) form; yet we represent person aka originating per sound (aka flow); which also implies being insane aka in sanus (within sound; hence resonating as choice to balance).

Thanks to pointing this out me.

what's the point

Life isn't outcome oriented (the point); it's balance oriented. Others suggest you to want outcomes; as to deceive you to ignore balancing by choice of reaction aka choice of want (tempting outcomes) over choice of need (struggling to balance).