Note that Fred Silverman, a New York Jew, was the force behind this at CBS that destroyed rural programming in preference of urban programming at CBS, then he moved onto ABC and NBC and did the same. Those were the biggest 3 networks, so 1 man basically managed to destroy rural shows from television.
"My old NYC brain realised what had been out of place. I no longer needed my urban danger vigilance. It was a deeply cathartic experience."
Urban danger vigilance is a great euphemism. Even normies know who you can and can't relax around.
50 plus million migrant invasion
110 plus million, per wikipedia.
1970 there were 178 million whites. 2020 there are 204 million whites.
1970 there were 25 million nonwhites. 2020 there are 141 million nonwhites.
At least a third of our country is invaders.
Sure, but we've seen that bullshit go the other way in the last year. It's plainly obvious how fake and gay the outrage is.
Ukraine sets up a motor pool and munitions depot in a mall they take over, it gets decried as a horrible warcrime when Russia bombs it does nothing and it blows up because of Ukranian incompetence.
Israel bombs a hospital. Oh well. Except instead of hitting exclusively warfighters, they also hit civilians.
It's the same fucking playbook, but one side is an atrocity and another is acceptable casualties.
More interesting is if you take a map of flu death rate by country, and flu vaccination uptake rate by country (among 65+, which is all the deaths).
Not a lot of countries have that data visible, but among the ones that do there is a clear correlation, the more vaccines the more deaths. Britain and Mexico have high deaths and high vaccination rate, Australia and France have low deaths and low vaccination rate, Eastern Europe has rates of both in the floor, and USA in the middle.
Some of that can be driven by having more deaths making people go out and get the vaccine, but if the vaccine actually worked you'd be able to see it on the macro level with 75% of the population getting it, and it simply doesn't do shit. It looks like it's even causal with how many more deaths pop up with more vaccines.
Is the source of "Time after time... ruined for life" your own ass? Got any studies or examples? Gay abuse, and pre-adolescent abuse gets conflated, but I've never seen anything showing life harm to teenage boys having underage sex with adult women (meanwhile there is tons of evidence it causes harm in girls).
In my own life I know a guy who was in a similar situation as the news story. He seems fine, and said it was pretty cool and his only complaint is that it made disappointed when he grew up because it made him think getting chicks would be easier than what it turned out to be.
I don't see the problem. When I was 13, I wanted to have sex. Unlike with girls, boys aren't harmed nor do they lose value when they have sex with an attractive member of the opposite sex. Unless the story is hiding something, it's not like he was being groomed into degenerate shit or exploited.
He isn't a child-child. 13 used to be old enough to hold a job and be head of household. It used to be old enough to go to war.
It is fucked up that she gets a laughably light sentence while the system pretends to be equal. But the truth is that men and women are different and one of those differences is that we're not really hurt by getting some action.
Yes, it has value in the form of showing how women actually are.
I was getting back into dating again and started watching Whatever podcast. I thought it was an extreme exaggeration. The more I date, the more it looks like the girls on Whatever are actually representative of women. The average woman on online dating seems to hold basically the same views they do about bodycount, men's chivalry, women's roles, etc..
I don't think most people would benefit from watching it, unless they're planning on dating soon or want to be depressed. It's like watching unedited streams of the lion exhibit at the zoo and not all that interesting... but if you're planning on climbing into the exhibit, you should probably figure out how they act first before you get eaten.
you know a woman is really into you if she'll do anal with you, even though it's presumably less pleasure, more pain, and arguably humiliating for her.
Yes, people in relationships feel more loved and secure if their partner makes willing sacrifices for them and, as long as it doesn't permanently damage them, the more painful the sacrifice the more loved they feel.
This is why even normal men want to have anal sex with their wives/GFs every so often, and why normal women want men to buy them expensive shit for no reason like $30 for flowers that do nothing but die and waste money or $3000 rocks. All the time is weird and fucked up and destructive (either gifts or anal), but every so often its a good barometer for the relationship.
Ehhh, there are some women pedos, but it really is 10x for men than women. When adults are asked if they were ever sexually assaulted as kids, of the ones who said yes 92% said it was a man, 4% a man+woman, and 4% a woman alone.
It's like crime. You can find news stories all day about white people committing crime, but that doesn't mean they commit per capita than black people.
Mandatory education is also a huge depressor. What's the point in having kids if you just act as a place that feeds them, keeps them overnight, and gets them ready for the real authority in the kids' lives, which is the government?
It turns out that when you take away people's authority (and charge them for the privilege), they become less invested in the product and less likely to have more of that product.
It's 4 female witnesses. 4 men wouldn't make any sense, because you wouldn't even need a woman's testimony in that case.
In Islam, 2 women = 1 man legally. So if you want a contract (which needs 2 male witnesses on your side), you can instead make do with 4 women or 2 women+1 man.
I'm with you. The 4000 year old book of "stupid superstitions" is a surprisingly good guide to civilization level morals. These things are for everyone's good.
It turns out that we aren't the first civilization to discover degeneracy. Or the first one to discover socialism. Or the first one to discover importing foreigners. Every other group that did that collapsed and went extinct, and we're next.
And the reason those "outdated morals" are still around is because only the people with those morals survived, and the deviants destroyed themselves. It's not obvious why these rules work, but they do, and it's in everyone's interest for us all to follow them.
I'm playing Dark Urge, and really enjoying it. For morality, it's not that the choices aren't evil, but they all make sense. It's not like the old games where good always gave you the best gameplay result and evil was just stupid. Evil choices here are sometimes just better (and sometimes worse).
Eg, I'm contemplating a second play through as good side, and I still think I might side with the emperor a little bit because at-will Fly for no action cost is that amazing as a power.
This is the first big RPG where I've actually enjoyed the evil options because they fit in with the character instead of being chaotic stupid. Other games have evil options and they lock you out and are self destructive, but I don't feel that way here. If you ever give the game another shot, I'd recommend just going in and playing like a role playing game as a person you want to be. You can be a badass who does what they want and doesn't take any shit. It's enjoyable and actually feels like a fully fleshed out path instead of an afterthought so they can claim there's 'morality options'.
Huh, I'm playing the game and I haven't seen anything that you're talking about.
- You don't need a dialog option to smack people who talk shit. Just Ctrl-click whenever someone disrespects you or shows degeneracy.
1.1 The squatter refugee quest seemed well handled, IMO. If you don't do anything, none of the eviction squad are assholes, and just knock out the one dude that tries to fight them. The guy evicting them isn't an asshole either; he just wants to keep people out of his house so they don't find evidence of his blackmail.
1.2 I have no idea who the lesbian priestess of Selune is. The only Selune priestess I can think of was the one making the magic light dome, and she didn't have any love interest that I saw at the inn before she died.
-
A black man came into your house and said he wanted to commit a felony, by murdering one of your companions. If you kept him alive, that's your fault if the game kept shoving him in your face.
-
I really don't see what you're talking about. Some of the response options to Gale are a little fruity, but he's basically been normal and I don't pick the gay options. Also haven't seen anything like that with the Emperor. He's just been a bro so far and given me magic flight powers.
-
Lorroakan was clearly signposted to be a miser at the start, since he sent some value-bin adventurers who could have never succeeded. Also, I'm surprised anyone kept Nightsong alive, since she was the source of the antagonists power and killing wasn't even particularly evil. It just seemed like the most straightforward way to stop him.
-
Baldur's Gate has always had some pretty campy villains. Jon Irenicus from BG2 starts the game by torturing you and then stealing your soul. He's got better dialog lines admittedly, but he's just as over the top. BG1 villains were even more 1-dimensional.
Overall, I've liked that the moral choices seem more like choices. All the time that you spend infiltrating the enemy means you get to see their point of view. My biggest regret in the game is that I didn't realize Minthara could be a companion, because at that point in the game I hadn't understood that you're supposed to be getting intel and hanging out with the servants of the Absolute instead of just killing them.
The new horde totally is different from the old horde. They no longer support the wanton genocide of the past and are now morally good.
Never mind their capital city is Orgrimmar. It's like germany losing the war and saying they hate Nazism, so their new capital is Hitlerville.
Slay the Spire sold at least 1.5 million copies. It's a $25 game, although goes on sale to around $10. So, it made somewhere between $15-$37.5 million gross, lets say roughly $10-$25 mil after Steam/etc cut.
Unity's new plan charges $12,500 for the first 1.1 million installs. It charges $24,000 for 1.1-1.5 million installs, $10,000 for 1.5-2.0 million, and another $10,000 for 2.0-3.0 million. If Slay the Spire 2 sells the same as before, they're paying 0.2% to .1%. If Slay the Spire sells double compared to before, they're looking at paying 0.1% to 0.04%.
I don't see how they migrate to a different engine for less than $40k-$60k. Any delay in their game that sold tens of millions of dollars has to cost more than that. It seems like they made that statement as a knee jerk reaction and I would be surprised if they follow through with it except to virtue signal, since it's very obviously against their own interest to do so.
The money hasn't run out, they're just shifting to places they think will have more impact before the election year.
They've got nearly unlimited money because they print it.