That's unironically probably their real reasoning. They won't say it, but a sudden influx of vibrancy is a proven method to obliterate demand, which reduces an entire city to a ghetto where they can store Democrat voters for next to nothing because property values are close to zero.
Remember, the ideal society for a leftist is billions of non-whites living in ten square foot concrete closets where they'll get high and watch CNN until the yearly period when the doors open for 24 hours so they can go vote blue no matter who.
You'd be surprised what you can achieve from doctor shopping. Look hard enough and you'll find a doctor who will do absolutely anything as long as you can pay for it.
However, it would be extremely unusual for a munchie to have an eye taken out. The headgear isn't permanent, is very conspicuous, and screams "I am disabled", so it's a munchie's dream, but I'm pretty sure even the most dedicated attention whore would stop short of enucleation. So in this particular case I'm willing to say we've found the rarest of specimens: a young woman who actually has (or had) a rare immune disorder.
I'll say this: declaring that you have a bunch of mysterious, vague, and of course improperly/untreated "immune conditions" is textbook munchausen's, especially when it comes from a younger, wealthy woman. So I'd be very careful taking any of this at face value.
Of course, that's not to say that things like EDS don't exist, and she very well may have been the one in a million to actually have a bunch of rare disorders, but all it takes is one look at the "spoonies" community to see what they truly are.
Other red flags include:
Tweeting numerous times a day about how hard life is
Self-identitying as "disabled"
Insisting on unnecessary TPN (they all do this for some reason)
Frequent and inexplicable stays in the hospital which achieve nothing
Unemployed
EDS in particular seems to be very popular among illness fakers
The real issue is, nobody is built like Kratos, and nobody can do what Kratos can do. Because he is a magical video game character.
The smart thing would be to not try to bring an unrealistic character into the real world.
I decided to find the original tweet to get some context vis a vis the hallucinatory Nazis this "person" is seeing, and I learned a few things.
-@cnni tweets like a million fucking times a day
-99% of what they tweet is fear mongering about white people or fear mongering about Russia
-there are a couple replies about globalism
-there are zero tweets about Jews
-there are zero tweets about killing or harming Chinese people
-interestingly, our friendly neighborhood genderblob saw "globalists" and subconsciously substituted "Jews"
This man seems, perhaps, somewhat mentally ill.
Yep. I can see it now. I think Twitter was having a problem.
I can't see it either and I'm in America.
The power dynamic is just an excuse. Women are always the helpless victim, no matter what. Even if the man is literally a prisoner and has no power at all, the woman is still somehow being taken advantage of. Even if the "man" is an underaged boy, it's still not her fault.
Bella has thus far kept her views on Pride to herself, but I’ve been in London for a few days and confess I am weary of Pride paraphernalia and flags. So on her behalf I wrote to Tractive, perhaps a little bad tempered. I suggested they stick to their business tracking pets, and spare us their obnoxious virtue signalling. Tractive’s reaction was to immediately cancel Bella. ‘Hey Jonathan. Based on your feedback, I have just cancelled your subscription,’ was the reply from Bonnie, the Tractive customer service agent, whose signature was adorned with three rainbows. ‘Wishing you a wonderful day,’ she added.
This just sounds like shitty AI causing problems. He said himself that it was a negative email, and there's a good chance he used the word "canceled" in it. Some machine somewhere probably interpreted that as "customer wants to cancel subscription". He didn't even try to follow up, apparently. I'm guessing "Bonnie" doesn't exist.
I'm somewhat skeptical. Although I do encourage everyone to shy away from companies that push pride.
Pikmin 2 actually already had to deal with this ages ago when it was first localized. Check it out. A lot of the names were changed, and tons of the descriptions were changed in tone. Originally, a lot of them had a very unsavory feel to them, like you're playing as a bunch of galactic scammers. This was changed to be more friendly in the west.
Japan has a lot of extremely negative stereotypes about merchants, particularly traveling merchants who sell odds and ends. They're viewed almost like gypsies are in Europe, minus the pickpocketing and baby stealing. It's a cultural norm that doesn't translate well to the west.
The Yakuza care about exactly one thing: making lots of money. They generally won't do anything too reprehensible, because being dead or in prison isn't a good way to make money, so I doubt they'll start supplying children to the GAE pedophiles or anything. But unless a sudden "unexplained" 5000% increase in child rape is bad for business, I doubt they'll care. Hell, they'll probably benefit. Broken children become broken adults, and broken adults love degenerate shit. They'll probably start selling black market estrogen and make an absolute killing in approximately 13 years.
They're tailor made to exploit every one of a liberal woman's weaknesses.
They dress and act silly, which allows them to bypass the already extremely faulty woke female threat detection because it's "just harmless fun".
They're an "oppressed minority" which makes the female brain shut down completely.
They're usually fairly attractive outside of their demon costumes, and I don't think I need to expound upon what you can get away with if you follow rules 1 and 2.
And finally, they're foot soldiers for the leftist regime, so favoring them is a way for the painfully mediocre to fight against Trump and his army of literal Nazi Death Eaters.
Once the women were on board with their existence, the rest was easy: getting access to the children of terrible mothers. Mommy already thinks drag queens are like so totally fun, so when they demanded to be alone with children (just for fun though! super fun and silly lol!), the answer was a resounding "yes". After all, it's just for fun, plus they wouldn't want to seem gasp bigoted. Letting pedophiles watch your children owns the rethuglicans! They have to do it!
Almost no man is on board with this, and even most women will probably tell you they aren't if they trust you enough to be totally honest around you. But the pedophiles don't need the majority on their side. They just need enough brainwashed single mothers to fill up a classroom.
Just because it's a return doesn't make it not binary. However, when returning gender, you'd generally want to either convert it to a string or return it as an enum so it's easier to understand than "0", because the reader doesn't necessarily know if 0 is male or female. I just didn't want to write all that.
Makes you wonder how the author happened upon these tweets that nobody else has even seen hmmmmm hmmmmmmm 🤔🤔🤔
The logical "or" you're familiar with. But in speech, "or" isn't used that way. The closest programming analogy to how it's used in speech would be a return statement. In this case, "return gender". Because we're not asking for a yes or no answer, we're asking for more information.
I guess a better way to put it would have been conditional or. People use that in real life too. "If we're out of eggs or they're on sale, buy eggs". That would return "true", but which condition is satisfied is irrelevant.
Male or Female is not a Yes answer. No one can be both. Sexual Reproduction exists.
It's also a pseud meme to begin with. It's conflating the logical "or" with the semantic "or", but they're not the same. It's not a logical operation, it's a request for more information. But le very smart redditor types think that because they took Intro to Visual Basic then they're cool programmers and can make jokes that only fellow hackers would get.
Plus, even if it was a logical or, answering "yes" doesn't fucking mean both are true.
As an actual programmer, I hate that trope like you wouldn't believe.
He only defeated her in the eyes of people already on his side though. She's been using this interview as proof that she defeated him and using it to advertise her propaganda show, and her boasting has a lot more reach because it has DNC money behind it. It's a net negative outcome for the side of truth.
If he had definitively proven her wrong about something, I could see where you're coming from. But he didn't. He asked her "do you hold these reprehensible beliefs?", she proudly replied "yes, I am an evil pedophile", he said "that's bad", and she said "nuh uh". A zero information exchange. As I said in another comment, reasonable humans don't need to be convinced that pedophilia is bad. They know it instinctively. So repeating "this woman is a pedophile, and that's bad" is just preaching to the choir.
There is no "neutral side" in this debate. You don't convince a child-fucker to become a good person by pointing out flaws in their logic.
Platforming is a real thing. Deplatforming is not. It's like how you can say words but you can't un-say them.
What new facts or information are being shared here that couldn't be shared in a much more efficient and effective way by simply stating them? Virtually everyone knows about these books because the left won't shut the fuck up about them, and if someone somehow doesn't know about them, this is a terrible way to introduce them to the topic.
If someone is capable of being moral, simply learning that there are books with gay porn, masturbation, and instructions on how to join a hookup app in schools will suffice to immediately inspire them to hate leftism. However, they may require proof for such a frankly extraordinary claim. Some guy wearing a beanie saying "trust me bro" is not proof. Screenshots are proof. Scans are proof. Show them the facts. Let them decide for themselves. That's what worked for me.
I personally credit zero percent of my current political awareness to internet cat fights, and I'd bet that almost everyone else would do the same if they really thought about it.
Schizo take. Platforming a propagandist - even for the purpose of "debating" her - is not countering their rhetoric. There is no rhetoric. It's all phantoms who will be gone before you finish destroying them with facts and logic.
This is what almost nobody understands. THE LEFT HAVE NO BELIEFS. You can "counter" all you want, but you will achieve nothing. This woman doesn't believe a single thing she's saying. It's all noises being fed through her lizard brain by whoever's paying her. She is not capable of having beliefs. She is a soulless golem animated by avarice. By the time you get done formulating the perfect response, her "belief system" has changed entirely and now you have to start over. Her existence serves only one purpose: to waste your time arguing with someone who does not exist.
The only appropriate thing to say to a propagandist is "kill yourself". Anything beyond that and you're playing their game on their terms.
Yes, but so what? Timcast fans are saying he wiped the floor with her, simps and trannies are saying she ebinly smacked him down, and both sides go on smugly believing they "won" yet another argument. Meanwhile, what actually transpired? An NPC delivered predictable NPC talking points straight from her masters at Actblue and Tim countered them with facts anyone with an IQ over 60 already knows. Nothing of any substance actually happened here. Nobody learned anything. Nobody's mind was changed. This is the very definition of sound and fury.
The way the "chemtrail" simply stops in an instant makes it look fake to me. If you've ever seen skywriting in action, the smoke (or whatever they use) doesn't instantaneously stop at a perfect flat edge. It tapers noticeably, as one would expect. Although at this distance it's somewhat difficult to tell, it still doesn't look right.
It's also strange that this appears to be a commercial airliner, which is not the choice I'd make if I was running a nefarious covert scheme. For one, all commercial flights are public record. You can track where each one is at all times. If they were disguising chemical weapons as passenger jets, it would be trivial to gather some very solid evidence. Discrepancies in flight paths, mysteriously empty planes, etc.
Third, this trail is coming out as one very thick trail. If they were trying to disguise chemicals as contrails - which are a very real, proven thing - they wouldn't make it look this way. Contrails start off as small, individual trails from the engines and join together as they disperse. Why would they release a chemtrail in such a blatantly conspicuous way when they could simply release it in a contrail pattern and immediately assuage all doubt?
My vote is for AI generated fakery created by someone who doesn't know how airplanes work. It's by far the most likely explanation for these very basic mistakes.
Oh don't worry. America is currently working very hard to erase every other language and culture on the planet and replace it with their own.
Well, "vote red unless you're dead" doesn't work because leftists continue to vote from the grave.