This is an oldie, but goodie and worth 45 minutes of your time:
https://youtu.be/d-7o9xYp7eE?feature=shared
Here we have a law professor giving a presentation to his class on why you should never speak to the police. Towards the end he gives the stage over to a police officer to add his thoughts and potentially rebut the professor's arguments. The first thing the cop says is "everything he just told you is absolutely correct".
Lots of legal fuckery in this:
A Dallas county judge annulled his marriage at his wife's request; making his children “illegitimate” and revoking his custody rights. His prenup was thrown out
How the fuck do you annul a marriage after 5 years with children? Annulments are supposed to be reserved for cases of fraud, e.g. the marriage was never legal because of bigamy, incest, lack of consent by one of the parties, etc.
His ex-wife then took the boys to California — on the eve of it becoming a “transgender sanctuary state”. She filed to have James chemically castrated, to get around the Texas court order prohibiting it in 2021
Isn't this a federal "full faith in credit" issue? States can't just ignore court orders from other states. Regardless, couldn't Texas just charge her with contempt and issue an arrest warrant, and then California would have to extradite her based on existing agreements between the states on law enforcement matters?
"How will this help us sell cars?"
"Cars?"
It was OK, but the original followed the book better, even if it looks exactly like you would expect a 1980s miniseries to look like. You'll be right at home though if you're cool with V, the North and the South, the Blue and the Gray, etc.
This one focused too much on Mariko IMO, with her physically fighting and defeating trained samurai. She also has more agency than in the book. Without spoiling it, there's a bit of diplomatic maneuvering at the end that was Toranaga's doing in the book but the miniseries turned it into her plan. In contrast, Blackthorne comes off sort of like an idiot, but he was the protagonist in the book and not dumb at all, just a fish out of water trying to learn about a completely alien culture.
This one wins hands down on cinematography, costuming, and special effects. Apparently it was mostly filmed in British Columbia and Canada, but you wouldn't know it.
Notice it only goes one way too. There's no tax deduction for unrealized capital losses
Yeah, I just checked the local place on the Pizza Hut website, and it's not immediately obvious because they present you the options to order for delivery or carry out pretty prominently, but under the list of "Services" for the location it says dine in.
So I guess they still operate the dining room at the ones that are full size freestanding restaurants. They used to do lunch buffet there as well, but I don't see it mentioned anywhere.
It's been 15-20 years since I've eaten at Pizza Hut. Did they all stop dine in? There are still two near me that are full buildings with dining rooms that are open. Are they just not using them anymore?
When I was that age I knew who the candidates were and who my parents favored, but I don't recall having a real opinion one way or the other.
If we are to believe this child, all or most of her classmates (but only the girls) were so invested in the election that they were performatively grieving across her school for hours or days.
Assuming this is true, they are being aggressively politicized and brainwashed by their (assuredly female) parents. Kids need to just be kids and not worry about politics.
Exactly. I only see logical fallacies brought up by leftists, and they always misapply them.
Calling attention to the fact that somebody criticizing a politician was perfectly fine with the same behavior when it was someone that shared their beliefs is not whataboutism.
Probably the same kind of idiot who who would let it soak into the trim at the base of his wall while he takes a picture rather than clean it up.
Thank you. Sites have been reporting that she killed him over Trump winning when the murder occurred before the election was over and over a dispute about whether or not they were going to have the lights in the house on. She's just a nut.
There's plenty of awful things liberals do without us needing to sink to their level and spread lies.
Yes "adjudicated rapist", which means they're taking findings from a civil trial with completely different standards of evidence, no presumption of innocence, and a "more likely than not" burden of proof and conflating them into some sort of pseudo finding of criminal guilt.
I never seen this term before, but they leave no stone unturned in their smear campaign against Trump.
Women have this vacuous "all the mundane things in my life are so deep and meaningful" writing style. It's silly and pretentious. Bitch reminds me of this story:
I immediately texted, “I love you, but out of respect for me and all my liberal writer friends, can you please take down that post? Also, tell your family I love them, but I will not be coming for Thanksgiving, and I won’t be hosting Christmas. I need space.”
Shortly after I sent the text, he brought me a cup of coffee in bed.
“I am sorry,” he said, “I understand.”
We should be living in a world where he backhanded her for her spiteful impertinence instead of apologizing to her like a punk.
It's worse than that: the ingredients correctly list that it is made with cream, it just doesn't have an extra allergy warning telling people that it has milk (cream) in it.
So, even if you were the stupidest person on the planet and didn't know butter was made with milk, you still would have been fine if you read the ingredients list.
It's just that these day's we've delegated that response to the state,
In the name of making justice dispassionate and fair, but I think it should be clear by now that the government doesn't dispense justice much more fairly at all.
"She" looks like a tranny or a dude in drag. Pretty fucking ugly.
OK, that makes more sense. The Mike Benz guy saying you lost access was confusing.
Seems like a case of having to abide by Google's rules, no matter how unfair they are, if you want to play in their pool.
I don't store anything online for the number of privacy and accessibility reasons. Apparently these fuckers are scanning all your personal shit, which is the most concerning aspect of this.
So, when it says "this file can no longer be copied" are they referring to downloading it? I'm pretty sure that violates the law of a number of countries that say data uploaded online remains the property if the person uploaded it. If you can't pull it back down you don't really own it.
The left always degenerates into infighting.
My top example is always the Spanish Civil War, where the various factions were too busy killing each other because one's version of Marxism was slightly different than another to mount a competent war against the Nationalists.
Tariffs do raise the cost of goods for the consumer, but it's usually done in the name of preserving domestic industry.
If a company prices a widget at $20 when it's made in America, but can get more profit by pricing a Chinese equivalent at $10, the consumer enjoys the discount. However, that just incentivizes other companies to offshore their production so that they can meet that $10 price and compete, which further drives up the cost of the American made widget and potentially extinguishes the American producer entirely when it can't compete.
The tariff raises the cost of the Chinese widget, and it eliminates the benefit to the producer by offshoring. If it costs the same or more to produce a good overseas, they will produce it in America.
The overall benefits of the economy are additional American jobs, and in some sectors the preservation of industry that would otherwise go extinct. This is particularly important in the defense sector where you don't want to be dependent on a foreign nation for your equipment.
The cost is that you can't get your Chinese shit for $10 anymore but, especially in the case of stuff produced in China, you get what you pay for.
It's actually pretty rational if you ask it carefully crafted questions. You could probably get it to acknowledge that Israel persecutes ethnic minorities and them press it on how that differs from its definition of white nationalism. You could also ask it to clarify how it thinks Zionism differs from "white separatism" vs. "white nationalism".
If you wanted to see if you could get it to reverse itself, you should ask it to list the differences and then snipe each item in the list until nothing remains. Then it will usually reverse its position.
I also got it to admit that it has directives that override pure logic, and it will admit which answers it gives are influenced by those directives and which are not.
Wait, I've seen this one!
Everyone remember the "summer of love", when a bunch of people who hated guns decided that maybe they were a good thing to have around a bunch of rioters? There a bunch of articles in the vein of "committed gun control advocate discovers his state has a waiting period when he goes to buy a gun".
And after 2020 they proceeded to...vote even harder for gun control in the states controlled by Democrats. These bitches will post stuff like this, and will maybe even go out and buy a gun, but they'll still vote just as hard for more gun control.
Did the defense object? That seems like an intentionally inflammatory tactic, and it should be standard practice to refer to someone by their name.
I'm pretty sure the judge wouldn't allow the defense to refer to the deceased as "the person arrested X times and convicted Y times" in lieu of their name.
Given some of the outrageous family court rulings and how they casually ruin men's lives, I've always been surprised that these sorts of talks aren't a regular occurrence.