Writing on or engraving a rifle makes more sense than something as disposable as ammo. Engraving weapons is a tradition that goes all the way to antiquity.
Investigators announced that rounds found near the shooter — who died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound — were inscribed with anti-ICE messaging.
How many people engrave their ammunition? I never heard of this practice until the assassination. It is suspect. It would be tedious to do it yourself, and expensive to have it professionally done, just to have to do it all again next time you buy ammo.
I guessed it was a trap. I guessed wrong.
So Britain is no longer trying to bring in infinity immigrants?
He's a jew. Anything he says about Jesus is deliberate deception.
Not really, no. That is PragerU conspiratorial gobbledygook, and no actual communist movement has ever used degeneracy to come to power. Why would they? It exists in opposition to the foundational tenets of the entire ideology
Somebody with an X account tell this stupid bitch about how Weimar Germany was on the verge of a jewish communist takeover.
all accounts without biometric data will be closed to prevent scams and fraud
Nothing prevents it from happening here. Some banks already give customers the option to submit biometric data, and nothing prevents them from suddenly making the data "mandatory" one day. If the banking cartel decides to do it, it won't matter that the Federal government doesn't require biometrics.
The controls the Feds have already imposed on banking ensure that the banking cartel would remain intact if they did this.
In that case, we need to ask for mass extermination of all Indian nationals within our borders, followed by nuclear annihilation of India once they're all there, so we can walk it back to canceling the H1-B program and revoking any green cards issued under it.
And we have to push for TKD just to get Trump to agree to not commit our military to Israel's wars or to abolish the Fed (it would be impossible to get him to agree to both).
You've got it all wrong. You see, in order to be a DHB, you have to advocate the murder of Shitty Human Beings (SHBs), and cheer whenever an SHB dies, whether by murder, accident, or natural causes. This is obviously true because allowing SHBa to live is murder, while murdering them is not murder.
You also have to advocate the murder of unborn babies. You see, allowing a baby to be born is murder, while murdering an unborn child is not murder. I see a similarity here. Is it because babies are SHBs? My research team is looking into it.
Because that country is controlled by its worst enemy, that's why.
Before I look, my guess is that it's something to further entrench jewish power in America.
"He was straight! Traps are totally not gay!"
What's the point of this archive? All I see is "good kitty" and a picture of a table.
No one on this site is saying people want others to be shot. This conversation is about what leftists on BlueSky are saying.
I’m sorry, who is saying that people want others to be shot?
The same people who are celebrating someone getting shot, of course.
Not exactly. If guns are legal, people are going to get shot once in a while. Leftists like the one in the screenshot take this to mean that if you understand this and you don't want guns banned, then you want people to get shot. That's not a reasonable way to look at it at all.
What I'm saying is the Charlie Kirk would not want guns banned, even after having been shot to death.
If he could be brought back to life, he would stand by those words, even knowing that he ended up being one of the gun deaths. That's one thing leftists don't understand. They think he only said that because he assumed other people would die and not him.
He has ears lower than eyes, a sloped forehead, droopy eyes, abs sick- looking, colorless skin. Just the sort of guy who would say "Fellow whites, we must <something that's against White people's interest>!"
They'll show up to arrest you for surviving, if you're still alive.
They don't think there should be any rural Americans. They want to force you to move to a city.
The quacks who promote trans drugs and surgeries are a completely different cohort from the dupes who agree to have their balls cut off. The latter genuinely believe they can become women, and join the 41% once they realize the truth.
Their idea of "logistics" is making it as easy as possible to cram as many people as possible onto as little land as possible, and making it so it's never necessary to leave. This reduces the carbon footprint per person, but also lowers the standard of living (but they try to sell this lifestyle as if it was a higher standard of living).
The logistics they present are a feasible way to achieve the jewish goal of insane population density. It's literally "live in the pod, eat the bugs, own nothing and be happy." They even sometimes have propaganda saying things like "who even wants a 2,000 square foot house anyway? What would you even do with that much space that doesn't even have any strangers in it? I'd rather live in 300 sq ft, just a few steps away from teeming crowds."
Is "Not Just Bikes" one of them? They call themselves "urbanists." Their whole vision assumes the government is benevolent and won't use your dependence on them to exert control (or if they do, then that control is good and proper). So of course you should want to give up your car and ride government-run or -funded busses and trains everywhere.
Just keep the archive.is URL and load it again in 20 minutes. The real work happens server-side.