And why can I talk bad about ragheads, liberal White women, or jeets all day without running afoul of that rule, but have to tred more carefully when talking about a certain other group?
You've got it all wrong. You see, in order to be a DHB, you have to advocate the murder of Shitty Human Beings (SHBs), and cheer whenever an SHB dies, whether by murder, accident, or natural causes. This is obviously true because allowing SHBa to live is murder, while murdering them is not murder.
You also have to advocate the murder of unborn babies. You see, allowing a baby to be born is murder, while murdering an unborn child is not murder. I see a similarity here. Is it because babies are SHBs? My research team is looking into it.
I, in a sense, am more against free speech than I used to be.
I want good speech to be incentivized and bad speech to be de-incentivized.
In the 50s you had obsenity laws. Nothing wrong with that.
The liberals idea of free speech is blasphemy, perversion, subverting truth, etc.
True free speech would be philosophical discussions on political issues, ability to criticize the government in reasonable adult ways, rather than burning flags or other stuff.
The ability to reason together in churches the Bible without being told by the government what the correct application or interpretation of the Bible is.
Free speech works for moral people with some amount of control over their tongues and a mind that is at least semi-rational
Leftists "You just want to take the speech WE say away, you're not about free speech".
Well, yeah now I am leftists. Didn't use to feel that way. But since you can't talk like an adult you lose speaking privileges.
It's like this scene from Boardwalk Empire "You sorta talked me into it"
When the communists are out of the country or you get criminalized for being a communist, and American citizens are not a bunch of overgrown children or weak effeminate men, then yeah, free speech is back on the table.
Like John Adams said "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other"
Likewise, freedom of speech when wielded by immoral and irreligious people becomes the megaphone of insanity. When you get called a nazi for stating that men are men and women are women, then it's time to stop letting the loonies run the asylum.
In reality, all that you need to have freedom of speech nowadays is still have public humiliation like being put in stocks where people can throw vegetables at you if you are advocating "transgender" ideology. That's really not an extreme thing, and yet in our pansified world, we'd never implement it. That "punishment" is way lesser than the crime.
You put someone in the public square in stocks with rotten vegetables thrown at them and they'd be embarrassed for a while and they'll remember that moment and it'll have a corrective effect....you teach children all this Marxist nonsense and you screw them up for life. Which is worse?
If that was the consequence for obscenity, then you'd find a lot more people hiding their twisted views.
Its really a very simple solution, no need for stockades or anything like that. There is only one group of people that aren't good faith citizens of the country and it's the group the guy in the OP is a part of. Remove them, all this shit goes away.
The left desperately needs a taste of their own medicine, but I fully oppose any speech or anti-terrorism legislation that will come up for congressional vote in the near future regardless of how much it appears to be an attack on the left’s views and organizations, because there’s no fucking way that policy is meant for them, they’re useful idiot supporters of every policy that ZOG wants to implement. Guaranteed that policy is a Trojan horse to usher in much more effective means to shut down the right’s abilities to speak out publicly and to organize IRL. The system looks at us as the only real threat to their power and agendas, that didn’t magically change just because Trumpstein got into office, which should be obvious to everyone on the right as we continue to see the system cover up the Epstein stuff, and as we see Trump enacting executive orders that target antisemites, which is the only group of people who really understand why TF the system is constantly going against American interests.
Except speech against Israel, right? That's always terrorism.
Why do you think we have rule 16?
And why can I talk bad about ragheads, liberal White women, or jeets all day without running afoul of that rule, but have to tred more carefully when talking about a certain other group?
I thought the left believed in Being a Decent Human Being?!
Maybe don't cheer on murder, and advocate for more political violence? This isn't hard...
It's hilarious to see these demonic fuckers spin out.
You've got it all wrong. You see, in order to be a DHB, you have to advocate the murder of Shitty Human Beings (SHBs), and cheer whenever an SHB dies, whether by murder, accident, or natural causes. This is obviously true because allowing SHBa to live is murder, while murdering them is not murder.
You also have to advocate the murder of unborn babies. You see, allowing a baby to be born is murder, while murdering an unborn child is not murder. I see a similarity here. Is it because babies are SHBs? My research team is looking into it.
Easy there Stalin. lol
A single murder is a tragedy, but the 63 million legally murdered by American women and doctors is apparently just a statistic.
Free speech means the government can't put you in jail for saying unpopular things.
Individuals can do whatever they want.
Interesting surname there...
https://tenor.com/view/every-single-time-berg-stein-gif-4656881768786966485
It's so cool that every one of the people doing this fake posturing about free speech is getting absolutely buried in "this u?" replies with receipts.
I, in a sense, am more against free speech than I used to be.
I want good speech to be incentivized and bad speech to be de-incentivized.
In the 50s you had obsenity laws. Nothing wrong with that.
The liberals idea of free speech is blasphemy, perversion, subverting truth, etc.
True free speech would be philosophical discussions on political issues, ability to criticize the government in reasonable adult ways, rather than burning flags or other stuff. The ability to reason together in churches the Bible without being told by the government what the correct application or interpretation of the Bible is.
Free speech works for moral people with some amount of control over their tongues and a mind that is at least semi-rational
Leftists "You just want to take the speech WE say away, you're not about free speech".
Well, yeah now I am leftists. Didn't use to feel that way. But since you can't talk like an adult you lose speaking privileges.
It's like this scene from Boardwalk Empire "You sorta talked me into it"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1OBAeRlde4
When the communists are out of the country or you get criminalized for being a communist, and American citizens are not a bunch of overgrown children or weak effeminate men, then yeah, free speech is back on the table.
Like John Adams said "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other"
Likewise, freedom of speech when wielded by immoral and irreligious people becomes the megaphone of insanity. When you get called a nazi for stating that men are men and women are women, then it's time to stop letting the loonies run the asylum.
In reality, all that you need to have freedom of speech nowadays is still have public humiliation like being put in stocks where people can throw vegetables at you if you are advocating "transgender" ideology. That's really not an extreme thing, and yet in our pansified world, we'd never implement it. That "punishment" is way lesser than the crime.
You put someone in the public square in stocks with rotten vegetables thrown at them and they'd be embarrassed for a while and they'll remember that moment and it'll have a corrective effect....you teach children all this Marxist nonsense and you screw them up for life. Which is worse?
If that was the consequence for obscenity, then you'd find a lot more people hiding their twisted views.
Its really a very simple solution, no need for stockades or anything like that. There is only one group of people that aren't good faith citizens of the country and it's the group the guy in the OP is a part of. Remove them, all this shit goes away.
Look at that poser. How many photos did he take to get the effortless-looking one?
The left desperately needs a taste of their own medicine, but I fully oppose any speech or anti-terrorism legislation that will come up for congressional vote in the near future regardless of how much it appears to be an attack on the left’s views and organizations, because there’s no fucking way that policy is meant for them, they’re useful idiot supporters of every policy that ZOG wants to implement. Guaranteed that policy is a Trojan horse to usher in much more effective means to shut down the right’s abilities to speak out publicly and to organize IRL. The system looks at us as the only real threat to their power and agendas, that didn’t magically change just because Trumpstein got into office, which should be obvious to everyone on the right as we continue to see the system cover up the Epstein stuff, and as we see Trump enacting executive orders that target antisemites, which is the only group of people who really understand why TF the system is constantly going against American interests.
Scanner Bridge, run an early life check on the perp, on the double!
What do retards who claim this even attempt to fall back on to make that point? "B-b-but muh racism! B-b-but muh black people!"