If he could be brought back to life, he would stand by those words, even knowing that he ended up being one of the gun deaths. That's one thing leftists don't understand. They think he only said that because he assumed other people would die and not him.
Not exactly. If guns are legal, people are going to get shot once in a while. Leftists like the one in the screenshot take this to mean that if you understand this and you don't want guns banned, then you want people to get shot. That's not a reasonable way to look at it at all.
What I'm saying is the Charlie Kirk would not want guns banned, even after having been shot to death.
No. OP's post is incorrect. He would not have wanted his death to be used as an excuse to trample the 2A. He also would not have wanted to be shot. They are not mutually exclusive and framing them that way is retarded.
2 and 3 are both acceptable, but 3 would be preferred. Just because you would sacrifice yourself for your principles doesn't mean you desired being a martyr.
If he could be brought back to life, he would stand by those words, even knowing that he ended up being one of the gun deaths. That's one thing leftists don't understand. They think he only said that because he assumed other people would die and not him.
Okay so then you’re saying the user in OP’s post is correct
Not exactly. If guns are legal, people are going to get shot once in a while. Leftists like the one in the screenshot take this to mean that if you understand this and you don't want guns banned, then you want people to get shot. That's not a reasonable way to look at it at all.
What I'm saying is the Charlie Kirk would not want guns banned, even after having been shot to death.
I’m sorry, who is saying that people want others to be shot? I agree that wouldn’t be a reasonable way to look at it.
Yes, I know
The same people who are celebrating someone getting shot, of course.
No. OP's post is incorrect. He would not have wanted his death to be used as an excuse to trample the 2A. He also would not have wanted to be shot. They are not mutually exclusive and framing them that way is retarded.
He’s saying that gun deaths are worth it in order to secure the 2A
Are you implying he’s saying other deaths, but not his?
No. I was saying that given the choices:
2 and 3 are both acceptable, but 3 would be preferred. Just because you would sacrifice yourself for your principles doesn't mean you desired being a martyr.