19
ShekelJa 19 points ago +19 / -0

The only other person they harbor this much hatred is Hitler. Really makes you question what we have been told about history.

17
ShekelJa 17 points ago +17 / -0

Which was why they killed him. They gave him the Plato treatment.

9
ShekelJa 9 points ago +9 / -0

That's so fucking gay. They just casually make shit up, marinate it in stink, and lob it at people they dont like while hoping it makes them wretch with horror.

5
ShekelJa 5 points ago +5 / -0

Always a red flag when both sides suck each other off like this.

8
ShekelJa 8 points ago +8 / -0

Has as much chance at life as an all White group, all men's groups, or an all White men's group.

5
ShekelJa 5 points ago +5 / -0

So the ass creed woke black gay samurai was not enough, people actually successfully created something worse

1
ShekelJa 1 point ago +1 / -0

What will that do? Will they all vote harder next time?

1
ShekelJa 1 point ago +1 / -0

It IS a tool after all. People here shitting on AI are the same people who shat on liberal retards for attacking guns every time a life is lost to one.

7
ShekelJa 7 points ago +7 / -0

The litmus test of good moddability is how well and how much can people mod Star Wars into a game.

7
ShekelJa 7 points ago +7 / -0

Riding public transportation while being White.

12
ShekelJa 12 points ago +12 / -0

Back in the day, faggotry was about sexual preference. In the current year, it is strictly a political party.

2
ShekelJa 2 points ago +2 / -0

The billionth time they turned a ginger into a darkie.

1
ShekelJa 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a response bias. 4400 may not compare to 30 million, but that does not assume only 4400 has suffered. Once those daytime commercials become saturated with ozempic claims, I anticipate that number to skyrocket.

3
ShekelJa 3 points ago +3 / -0

I remember when the doc pushed that shit on me in Q1 2023. The pamplet was so pristine and made ample use of popup-book technology.

She and the pamphlet went over virtually everything about the drug.... except the damn side effects. That was the red flag that told me to walk away from that crap.

3
ShekelJa 3 points ago +3 / -0

In my opinion, the demand for will power and discipline with eating properly only arises in response to the turbulence with cutting out calories without correcting the physiological barriers.

From what I have seen, anyone can potentially side step the need for will power and discipline if they approach their weight management with a cohesive physiological context.

Unfortunately, the secret is so deviant from the establishment standard of care that people would probably accuse me of being a witch for bringing it up.

2
ShekelJa 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's retarded, I had people push acupuncture as a secret weight loss and health improvement tool while simultaneously invalidating every nutrition intervention that I have developed to address the same issues.

1
ShekelJa 1 point ago +1 / -0

At the end of the day, you lose weight by eating less AND by keeping your insulin levels below threshold for as long as possible.

Most people who fail to lose weight by eating less and moving more often unknowingly keep their insulin levels chronically elevated, forcing the body to preferentially force people to eat by worsening hunger and cravings or by forcing the body to preferentially lower metabolic rate.

In essence, a deficit coupled with low insulin yields continuous long-term weight loss without the turbulence of discomfort. It is the missing piece of the puzzle for people who can't find the ability to reliably eat less.

1
ShekelJa 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is an interesting point you made, because the price difference is a misconception.

Eating the cheap junk food only drives hunger even more, causing people to eat even more.

The paradox of healthy eating is that, despite it being more expensive, the food will fill you up to such an absurd degree that you will intuitively eat significantly less, resulting in a smaller food bill. The irony is that cheaply priced junk food is significantly more expensive.

From personal experience, I can comfortably subsist on a 48 hour fast if I eat ~6 dollars worth of meat. I would barely last 4 hours if I ate ~6 dollars worth of ultra processed garbage.

3
ShekelJa 3 points ago +3 / -0

You completely disregarded the entire biochemical process behind weight loss.

And you people wonder why so many people fail to lose weight simply by "eating less, moving more". It is not a lack of will power or discipline. It is a lack of understanding of the physiological implications behind different foods.

1
ShekelJa 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wrong. Eating different foods determine how easy it is to lose weight on a deficit.

You are more than welcome to prove us wrong by eating at a caloric deficit exclusively eating high fructose foods.

You people will never bother of course. People like me have experimented and can tell you that eating properly makes it easy to fast for up to 48 hours. It would be impossible to smoothly maintain a 48 hour fast if you eat junk food of the same caloric amount.

1
ShekelJa 1 point ago +1 / -0

Every single drug that enters the market will eventually have the airwaves saturated with "DID YOU TAKE THIS DRUG? YOU MAY HAVE A CLAIM!" in a matter of months.

view more: Next ›