9
MargarineMongoose 9 points ago +9 / -0

Why yes I am spending my Sunday evening trying to build a tiny mod for a 25 year old game that I'm still playing.

Why do you ask?

0
MargarineMongoose 0 points ago +1 / -1

If you set that standard then every single woman will fail to meet it. The ones you think meet it are just a case of you failing to screen thoroughly enough, which will be revealed later with catastrophic results. It's more sensible to just fall back on old wisdom: No women in leadership roles.

Traditions are solutions to problems we forget existed. You'd be an idiot to casually discard them.

0
MargarineMongoose 0 points ago +1 / -1

You know what standards include? Not "spazzing out".

So you agree that women are to be excluded after all. Fantastic.

10
MargarineMongoose 10 points ago +10 / -0

Exactly. This is cultural warfare. The aim isn't to make money, it's to create a specific culture and Blackrock is there to provide funding for the brainwashing operations.

1
MargarineMongoose 1 point ago +2 / -1

and you'll find a woman who meets those standards and then spazzes out like a woman once she gets in, thus proving that your standards were inadequate.

I swear to god, you're in denial about the reality of the human animal at every turn.

1
MargarineMongoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

This weekend I've been drifting back to listening to classical music as background noise as I work on building small mods for Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn. There's just something about pure instrumental music that lends itself to the focus needed to dig into more technically demanding work.

1
MargarineMongoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

Beast in Black was such a good find. I also appreciated how they dedicated their third album to Kentaro Miura when he passed.

3
MargarineMongoose 3 points ago +4 / -1

The standard is "no women". But sure, keep telling me I'm "objectively wrong" because I refuse to ignore reality while you advocate for your utopian fantasy world where women don't behave like women.

2
MargarineMongoose 2 points ago +3 / -1

Do you just copy/paste this shit for giggles or are you actually this retarded? You've admitted to being autistic before, so I have to imagine that accounts for at least some measure of your idiocy and inability to understand why you're wrong and need to fuck off into a deep dark hole.

3
MargarineMongoose 3 points ago +4 / -1

Are you willing to gamble away your entire civilization on that rarity?

Barring women from positions of leadership has been the norm for millennia and there have been plenty of flourishing societies during that time.

9
MargarineMongoose 9 points ago +10 / -1

Well that's just silly because you intentionally miss out on excellent candidates.

I am intentionally missing out on the certainty of catastrophic candidates. A few exceptions do not outweigh the costs of ignoring reality. Women are not suited to lead nations. Full stop.

1
MargarineMongoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be fair, he did at least provide an archived link to the comment, which is a hell of a lot better than most people manage.

I do however agree that it doesn't mean a whole lot on its own though.

16
MargarineMongoose 16 points ago +17 / -1

Just one more item on the veritable mountain of evidence that women need to be under the control of a man at all stages of their life. You cannot convince me these are fully functioning adults.

1
MargarineMongoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bring back Nerdcore.

The rest of the genre can burn for all I care.

4
MargarineMongoose 4 points ago +6 / -2

I think the raw numbers game of it all is reason enough to just offhandedly dismiss the possibility of female leadership outright. Allowing exceptions means you're likely to allow more mistakes through, which ends up being a net negative in my estimation.

21
MargarineMongoose 21 points ago +21 / -0

I think it's as simple as "those who are evil are no longer punished by those who are good."

Evil has always existed and will flourish if not actively combated. Somewhere along the way it became taboo to punish the wicked and soon after it became illegal. I think at least some of this can be traced back to allowing the state to achieve a total monopoly on violence. People would not do this if they thought someone would deck them in the face for it.

5
MargarineMongoose 5 points ago +5 / -0

In a sane world you’d think someone would have the guts to say “don’t you think people are getting sick of hearing about black racial grievances”?

In a sane world saying that wouldn't get me immediately ostracized by everyone I know and love, but this is the world I'm stuck in.

3
MargarineMongoose 3 points ago +9 / -6

Please don't .jpg post like this without supplying the source, especially during election season.

3
MargarineMongoose 3 points ago +3 / -0

Almost every serviceman I know is voting for Trump. The people in the military who are against Trump are those who don't do the fighting and instead spend their time politicking in DC. That or they're non-white and voting on racial lines, but hey at this point why wouldn't you?

5
MargarineMongoose 5 points ago +5 / -0

That and all the studies they agree with have trouble being reproduced.

It's all just a fucking priest class dictating whatever benefits themselves as dogma for the masses to adhere to.

2
MargarineMongoose 2 points ago +3 / -1

Sorry, Jews are a religion

Jews are not solely a religion. You are being dishonest and therefore a bad person.

I don't understand why you struggle with this so much.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›