The standard is "no women". But sure, keep telling me I'm "objectively wrong" because I refuse to ignore reality while you advocate for your utopian fantasy world where women don't behave like women.
and you'll find a woman who meets those standards and then spazzes out like a woman once she gets in, thus proving that your standards were inadequate.
I swear to god, you're in denial about the reality of the human animal at every turn.
You literally aren't willing to accept nuance or human behavior. You want an easy, reductive, sort feature in humans; and I'm telling you there isn't one. That is the reality of the human animal.
You know what standards include? Not "spazzing out".
Or are you going to tell me that standards don't apply after you get into a position?
Or perhaps you'd just like to throw out standards once you select someone at random that might have passed your initial mass filter on your excel sheet?
The standard is "no women". But sure, keep telling me I'm "objectively wrong" because I refuse to ignore reality while you advocate for your utopian fantasy world where women don't behave like women.
I don't need to. I just have a set of standards.
and you'll find a woman who meets those standards and then spazzes out like a woman once she gets in, thus proving that your standards were inadequate.
I swear to god, you're in denial about the reality of the human animal at every turn.
You literally aren't willing to accept nuance or human behavior. You want an easy, reductive, sort feature in humans; and I'm telling you there isn't one. That is the reality of the human animal.
You know what standards include? Not "spazzing out".
Or are you going to tell me that standards don't apply after you get into a position?
Or perhaps you'd just like to throw out standards once you select someone at random that might have passed your initial mass filter on your excel sheet?
So you agree that women are to be excluded after all. Fantastic.