Well that's just silly because you intentionally miss out on excellent candidates.
I am intentionally missing out on the certainty of catastrophic candidates. A few exceptions do not outweigh the costs of ignoring reality. Women are not suited to lead nations. Full stop.
The standard is "no women". But sure, keep telling me I'm "objectively wrong" because I refuse to ignore reality while you advocate for your utopian fantasy world where women don't behave like women.
and you'll find a woman who meets those standards and then spazzes out like a woman once she gets in, thus proving that your standards were inadequate.
I swear to god, you're in denial about the reality of the human animal at every turn.
I am intentionally missing out on the certainty of catastrophic candidates. A few exceptions do not outweigh the costs of ignoring reality. Women are not suited to lead nations. Full stop.
You're still objectively wrong, and all you have to do is have standards.
The standard is "no women". But sure, keep telling me I'm "objectively wrong" because I refuse to ignore reality while you advocate for your utopian fantasy world where women don't behave like women.
I don't need to. I just have a set of standards.
and you'll find a woman who meets those standards and then spazzes out like a woman once she gets in, thus proving that your standards were inadequate.
I swear to god, you're in denial about the reality of the human animal at every turn.