I think the raw numbers game of it all is reason enough to just offhandedly dismiss the possibility of female leadership outright. Allowing exceptions means you're likely to allow more mistakes through, which ends up being a net negative in my estimation.
Profiling like that goes against any reasonable standard under which a tolerable society can function. There is no individual who can't be unfairly discriminated against under some category they share.
Well that's just silly because you intentionally miss out on excellent candidates.
All you do is set a standard and don't move it.
Women are allowed to play in the NFL. At no point has the NFL changed their fitness standards to allow women to play on football teams. There remains no women at the professional level.
Should an Amazonian appear, then maybe she can play. Simple As.
Well that's just silly because you intentionally miss out on excellent candidates.
I am intentionally missing out on the certainty of catastrophic candidates. A few exceptions do not outweigh the costs of ignoring reality. Women are not suited to lead nations. Full stop.
The standard is "no women". But sure, keep telling me I'm "objectively wrong" because I refuse to ignore reality while you advocate for your utopian fantasy world where women don't behave like women.
I don't think it's silly as keeping standards has proven to be anything but easy. But it's worth noting one of the Judges in Israel's turbulent period was a woman named Deborah. Maybe a Margaret Thatcher type.
Yes, probably. The stormfags tell me that updoots don't matter, but they absolutely use bots and alts to updoot themselves and downdoot me. It is one of the many reasons that they are Leftist faggots.
I think the raw numbers game of it all is reason enough to just offhandedly dismiss the possibility of female leadership outright. Allowing exceptions means you're likely to allow more mistakes through, which ends up being a net negative in my estimation.
Profiling like that goes against any reasonable standard under which a tolerable society can function. There is no individual who can't be unfairly discriminated against under some category they share.
I've had competent and respectable female bosses.
Are you willing to gamble away your entire civilization on that rarity?
Barring women from positions of leadership has been the norm for millennia and there have been plenty of flourishing societies during that time.
So were human sacrifices.
As I said:
At this point I'm thinking we should get back to doing those as well.
Well that's just silly because you intentionally miss out on excellent candidates.
All you do is set a standard and don't move it.
Women are allowed to play in the NFL. At no point has the NFL changed their fitness standards to allow women to play on football teams. There remains no women at the professional level.
Should an Amazonian appear, then maybe she can play. Simple As.
I am intentionally missing out on the certainty of catastrophic candidates. A few exceptions do not outweigh the costs of ignoring reality. Women are not suited to lead nations. Full stop.
You're still objectively wrong, and all you have to do is have standards.
The standard is "no women". But sure, keep telling me I'm "objectively wrong" because I refuse to ignore reality while you advocate for your utopian fantasy world where women don't behave like women.
I don't think it's silly as keeping standards has proven to be anything but easy. But it's worth noting one of the Judges in Israel's turbulent period was a woman named Deborah. Maybe a Margaret Thatcher type.
Do you have a bot that follows you and automatically downvotes you every time you post? I only ever see you with a -1.
He's literally +4/-0 three comments up this chain.
Yes, probably. The stormfags tell me that updoots don't matter, but they absolutely use bots and alts to updoot themselves and downdoot me. It is one of the many reasons that they are Leftist faggots.
Oh get over yourself. No they don't.