I mean I get the idea behind cutting off future leftists from radicalizing each other but you'd also lose things like this: https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/124349239949139968
Look back at the 1960s and 70s. Leftists bombed (among many, many other targets) the US Capitol and made the exact same "white people bad" proclamations that they do now. With the Capitol bombing specifically nobody was ever arrested. People in the organization were allowed to just keep doing exactly what they were doing and get normal jobs and a bunch of them ended up as college professors. Barack Obama's political career started in Bill Ayers's living room.
There was another local guy who did a TV spot where he explained that the old guy who immediately took credit was a well known local nutjob. It's not impossible that he was in on the group chat but it's more likely he wasn't connected. The guy who was carrying the pellet gun was definitely an intentional decoy though.
100% of the people who would vocally boycott Israel are leftists at best, foreign subversives at worst, so this is perfectly fine with me. Rolling up Hamas demonstrators on college campuses is good for the same reasons. It would be good if there was a less inflammatory universal reason but things just aren't at the point where you can use government power to lock people out of society for voting for Obama so you have to have proxies.
Every major company is packed full of people who support leftists. None of the leftist doxxing and deplatforming movements of the last decade were organic, every one of them had direct insider support and was also directly supported by the US government.