0
LibertyPrimeWasRight 0 points ago +1 / -1

If you’re really so blackpilled that you don’t care, please go shoot yourself, or at least shut up. Other people who haven’t given up on life or solving problems are trying to accomplish things, and spewing negativity makes you not just unhelpful but, effectively, an agent of the opposition. No one in your position should be giving advice or opinions, because you have nothing to offer that isn’t corrosive.

4
LibertyPrimeWasRight 4 points ago +5 / -1

The other issue is that it’s just not really true, and to the extent that there is some truth to it, it’s misrepresentative. Yes, white women are more liberal than white men. But, they’re also more conservative than any nonwhites, men or women. If you’re saying “white women are The Problem,” you’re out of touch. Additionally, they’re kind of necessary for the continuation of the white race, or, if you want to be nonracial, women are necessary for the continuation of humanity. If you want to argue “repeal the 19th, make women by default more subservient to and more respectful of men,” that’s one thing. But usually, posts like this aren’t arguing that. They’re arguing “I HATE WOMEN, so let’s abandon them to the savages out of revenge!”

But let’s pretend that’s not a shortsighted, petty, stupid motivation that dooms either your race or your species—depending on how broad you’re being—to extinction. Are you really going to refuse to solve the “insane, violent, black criminal” issue just because doing so would be potentially beneficial to some women? Sure, people like this guy are more likely to go after a girl than a guy, but they’d still like to kill plenty of white men too. And even if they never, ever attack you, you’re still dealing with the consequences of his actions in terms of the economic and societal damage they cause.

It’s just spiteful, edgy, retard shit.

3
LibertyPrimeWasRight 3 points ago +3 / -0

I totally understand where you’re coming from, but at a certain point, I think you just have to deal with the world as it is. And in this case, that means accepting that maaaaaybe this girl leaned left, or maybe was even a bit of an activist, but she still shouldn’t have been killed in this way, it still speaks to a monstrous issue that needs fixing, and that taking this moment to spread rumors that directly undermine efforts to address the issue is a bad idea. Even if those rumors turn out to be true.

4
LibertyPrimeWasRight 4 points ago +5 / -1

Okay, man. So, what’s your plan going forward? Let white people die out? I’m sure that on average, non-white women are more conservative than white women, right? …Right? Oh, they aren’t? That’s too bad. Maybe you want to swear them all off and just let humanity die? This path is just a complete dead end.

12
LibertyPrimeWasRight 12 points ago +12 / -0

I don’t intend to discount that entirely, but I think it’s extremely counterproductive to make that your focus. This killing is among the most blatant examples of black criminality, black racism, issues with the revolving door justice system, and issues with public transportation all rolled into one. It is breaking into the mainstream in a way that other incidents haven’t. It has, if we’re being honest, about the most sympathetic victim one could ask for. Completely unthreatening, war refugee, woman, sitting there minding her own business completely.

If you see all that and your first choice is “I better dig up dirt on the victim so I can discount her death” rather than “holy shit, I need to push hard on this because it’s terrible on its own, but maybe we can finally get some useful policy changes,” your political instincts are shit.

19
LibertyPrimeWasRight 19 points ago +19 / -0

Maybe. The uncropped photo looks more like she’s hanging out in someone else’s room. Allegedly, this is her room.

But let’s assume for a second that it is her poster: you should still be getting upset about the blatant anti-white hatred this incident demonstrates, the lack of punishment for violent criminals, and, frankly, that white girls are being propagandized into supporting BLM and not being cautious around black people. Going “lol, she had a poster in support of a super whitewashed default normie leftist position, she therefore deserved to die and I won’t get upset about her killing by a violent black psychopath” would be braindead even if the poster weren’t possibly fake news.

28
LibertyPrimeWasRight 28 points ago +29 / -1

Antonio was also hanging out in those threads about India asking if people had proof that Indians scam and lie a lot. He works very hard to not see obvious things.

7
LibertyPrimeWasRight 7 points ago +7 / -0

I wonder what the gen Z men would score highly on as a group. Maybe some stuff like “national sovereignty,” or “immigration control,” but in terms of things that are not directly political, is there anything they’d get near 50% on?

57
LibertyPrimeWasRight 57 points ago +57 / -0

If your defense is “I’m fundamentally unable to distinguish acceptable and unacceptable behavior, to the level of random physical violence, in a way that most people are not,” then you are saying “I am not fit to be in society,” and the only thing society should say back is “yes.” It’s insane that “incompetent to stand trial” does not lead to automatic lifelong committal in more sympathetic cases, and execution in those that are less so.

8
LibertyPrimeWasRight 8 points ago +9 / -1

Also stop sharing soygon of cuckad's bullcrap here as the fucker bashes loli like an idiot.

This is maybe the worst thing to be single-issue about that I've ever seen. You are truly insane.

9
LibertyPrimeWasRight 9 points ago +10 / -1

Right, I wouldn’t either, and most people shouldn’t. But this guy was clearly exceptional, with an exceptional execution on the genre. Perhaps advice for most people simply doesn’t apply to him.

6
LibertyPrimeWasRight 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why’s it got Loki’s name on it? Miles Thorales got his property tagged by his greatest enemy? That doesn’t make him look good.

1
LibertyPrimeWasRight 1 point ago +1 / -0

You misunderstand. India isn’t a massive existential threat because it’s overtly powerful. It’s a massive threat because if you engage with Indians on friendly terms, they will lie, cheat, and steal. If you make the mistake of importing them as workers—and India often attempts to put riders encouraging this in their trade deals—they will form ethnic preference networks that will then work to consistently bring in more Indians. This will not only leave natives unemployed, but also, thanks to the aforementioned traits of lying, cheating, and stealing, ultimately degrade whatever company employs them with increasingly substandard products overseen by con men with fake credentials. “Pushing India into the arms of Russia or China” is not so much providing them a useful ally as a massive poison pill, while simultaneously decreasing that poison’s impact on us.

1
LibertyPrimeWasRight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude, even if Nick Fuentes’ professed beliefs were smack dab in the middle of the Overton Window—and by the way, the second they were, he’d change all of them to be more extreme, because that’s the kind of person he is—it would still be dumb to engage with him because he’s a flip flopping, bad faith troll who spends more time winding his audience up to attack putative allies than basically anything else. At best, he’s completely incapable of prioritization or nuance. At worst—and more likely—he’s overtly hostile to any real right-wing progress being made.

1
LibertyPrimeWasRight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Legal immigrants typically buy houses,

You led off with a thing that’s objectively bad. Unless you somehow think Americans under 50 aren’t having enough trouble buying houses already?

9
LibertyPrimeWasRight 9 points ago +9 / -0

So true. We should have done it long before this, for many other reasons. But it happened now, so I’m not going to complain.

10
LibertyPrimeWasRight 10 points ago +10 / -0

On a day to day basis, I agree, but in terms of publicly sending the message, I bet a missile works a lot better. Considering how long the border has been effectively undefended, there’s probably some major deterrence value in occasionally making a super splashy kill like this.

9
LibertyPrimeWasRight 9 points ago +10 / -1

The point of publicizing things like this is that if you make it clear you’re willing to kill drug smugglers and invaders, a lot of them won’t even try because they don’t want to be killed. Obviously, we can’t launch missiles at thousands of boats. But we won’t have to.

14
LibertyPrimeWasRight 14 points ago +15 / -1

Pyrrhic would be if we had expended too many resources to accomplish it again. At worst you could say this is a token victory, but I care much more about the optics and implications of the White House publicly posting footage of military intervention against cartel drug smuggling on Twitter than I do about whether this specific incident is a massive bust or “merely” one shot. We all know military intervention exactly like this, along with the implied message of “we will fucking explode you, even if you think you’re just one boat beneath our notice”—and in this sense, it may actually be better and more effective that this is “just” one small boat—is the only thing that can really stop the flood of drugs and migrants, and yet it would have been unthinkable even just a year ago that we’d actually deploy the military to do this.

This is a fantastic thing to see, and one has to twist themselves into silly knots of doomerism to not appreciate it. Don’t bitch about an objectively positive action just because it is the beginning and not the finale.

10
LibertyPrimeWasRight 10 points ago +10 / -0

[Most of London] is horrible these days [...] Not clear why, or when this happened...

Uh huh.

1
LibertyPrimeWasRight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Surprised they haven't began implanting horns too. Maybe that's next.

There are demon-themed drag shows, I believe.

view more: Next ›