A lot of boomers (and their “anti-racist” ideological progeny) hang their hats on the “illegal versus legal immigration” distinction, but it’s a distinction without a difference. The arbitrary whims of the legislature or the judiciary do not magically transform the great replacement into a morally acceptable thing that we must all embrace. All mass immigration is invasion. All mass immigration is disastrous for the native population. If your government is forcing mass immigration upon you, then they are an existential threat to you, and you should defend yourselves by any and all appropriate means.
Because the legal immigration limit is 675,000 per year. That's not mass immigration.
Legal immigrants typically buy houses, make friends, learn some English, and participate. They spent a lot of money and time getting here. Even if they're not compatible like Muslims they are least still want basic infrastructure to work.
"Want basic infrastructure to work" the standard of what is an american, lol my sides.
Its like the question: what is a woman? You disrespect us, and yourself if you are a white american, when you reduce us to merely people that agree that we "want basic infrastructure to work." That is a massive insult to us all. A woman is someone that wants to be a woman. No, a woman, a man, an American, an Englishman, is much more than some catch all bullshit that waters down who we truly are in order to accommodate more and more outsiders.
I'm sure Haitians want their infrastructure to work, even if they don't have any idea how to make it work.
As opposed to illegal immigrants like the caravans during Biden admin. They don't care if the water breaks or the sewers clog, they'll just move on to another place to destroy.
And you think the legal jeets, Hispanics, Asians, Arabs, and Africans wont? You’re woefully ignorant and completely oblivious if you haven’t seen how they’ve already massively degraded the quality of life in America.
Because the legal immigration limit is 675,000 per year.
That's absolutely mass migration. We can do with 10% of that number. Integration can optimally take place in 3 generations, but if people are settling into ethnic enclaves, then we are looking at 6, maybe 8 generations, if that. It's pants on head retarded to have that many immigrants with no incentive to assimilate besides hope and pixie dust.
Even if they're not compatible like Muslims
Even as a Civic Nationalist, I tell you this absolute truth: the fact that they are not compatible is proof that they should be made to leave.
Integration can optimally take place in 3 generations, but if people are settling into ethnic enclaves, then we are looking at 6, maybe 8 generations, if that.
How many generations if the majority of the media is telling them that every failure they experience in life is due to native whites conspiring against them, and gives 24 hour coverage for a month every time someone with their skin color gets shot by a white cop?
Because the legal immigration limit is 675,000 per year.
We have 10x this number of actual Americans who need taking care of before we should be offering a single loaf of bread to non-Americans. By your own admittance they are buying up houses when American home ownership is at all time lows, and can do so because they are wealthy enough to spend "a lot of money" to get here.
So even when you are trying to make them sound like a good thing, you are showing they are still a problem.
Americans don't need 'taking care of', that's pussy language. Housing is tight because of 40 million illegals not legals.
You guys really don't want successful white Christians and scientists coming here from Poland? Weird. What about this Graham Linehan - an Irishman, classic American stock - he seems like a stand-up dude.
You're just a little reddit hivemind clone, believe whatever your clique believes, with no sane rationale for it.
When the government is involved, its literally their job and duty to put American needs above foreign ones. If they wish to not be responsible for that, then they can stop taking my taxes which they claim are literally for that purpose.
Housing is tight because of 40 million illegals not legals.
Half my town is owned by Asian and Indian immigrants, fully legally here but living in another state, who simply used all that money they had to buy up all the houses or open land to build cheap properties on.
You guys really don't want successful white Christians and scientists coming here from Poland?
I know this may shock you, but some of us can think beyond "WHITE GOOD" and our opposition to immigration isn't created on racial hatred.
Said nothing of the sort, I said my issue with immigration was regardless of color. If there were a large contingent of Poles doing it, the problem would remain a problem.
I know reading gets in the way of your masturbation exercise here, but at least try to follow.
Are you guys all morons? There's a deficit of something like 1.5 million homes and 30+ million illegals. They live ten to a rental unit, drive up rents, people of means choose to by a house instead of renting, housing prices go up from demand. It's basic supply and demand. More demand, higher prices.
People coming here legally becoming invested into the welfare of the country is objectively not a bad thing. People with roots want the country to succeed, whereas illegals that can be deported at any time are just out for their short-term benefit (are parasites).
I don't trust Charlie Kirk any more than I do the rest of the controlled opposition Con Inc, but a W is a W. Be happy that the Overton Window is shifting.
Someone recently called in and asked Charlie if he would speak with Nick Fuentes, and Charlie completely dismissed the question as "bad faith". He seems to say that a lot. It doesn't matter if anyone agrees or disagrees with either one, but at least being able to speak about pressing matters and address the elephants in the room might at least help put people on the right path for correcting some of the problems.
Nevertheless, he seems to be placating the more vocal members of his community, but acknowledgment without action is fruitless.
Dude in 10 out of 10 outcomes Charlie Kirk would sabotage his career by speaking with Nick. He's never going to do it. The Overton window would have to basically teleport for that to happen.
You guys are like "If Andrew Jackson doesn't rise from the dead and take the White House then nothing is happening"
Dude in 10 out of 10 outcomes Charlie Kirk would sabotage his career by speaking with Nick. He's never going to do it.
That's the crux of the matter there. Kirk's career is more important than speaking about the actual issues in an actionable and productive way. He can proselytise good vibes and "doing the right thing", but he oftentimes ignores the catalysts behind the problems that he's not exactly addressing head-on -- other than to spout platitudes to get a few nods from his followers, and silence some of his more vocal detractors.
He hides behind "bad faith questions" as a retort all the time as a way to save face for -- as you pointed out -- his career. It's a way to dodge the actual issues plaguing the modern male youth in first-world nations.
It is. Because it means people are willing to engage with actual problems instead of dancing around obvious issues and pretending that just "getting married and having kids" will fix the jogger problem, the immigration problems, the rape gangs in England, Sweden, Denmark, Germany and France, and the housing crises affecting a nearly non-existent middle-class in first-world nations.
Charlie putting out empty platitudes doesn't change what's actually happening. The Overton Window doesn't shift until people who enact action in any of the regions where the Great Replacement is happening actually put forward policies that people can openly talk about and get behind to STOP the replacement. Otherwise, it's pointless bloviating.
Dude, even if Nick Fuentes’ professed beliefs were smack dab in the middle of the Overton Window—and by the way, the second they were, he’d change all of them to be more extreme, because that’s the kind of person he is—it would still be dumb to engage with him because he’s a flip flopping, bad faith troll who spends more time winding his audience up to attack putative allies than basically anything else. At best, he’s completely incapable of prioritization or nuance. At worst—and more likely—he’s overtly hostile to any real right-wing progress being made.
It doesn't matter what his beliefs are, he's talking about things impacting the average young White male in the U.K., and the U.S., in open and honest ways that almost none of the anti-establishment voices are. There's no question he's a plant, but he's a plant using talking points that directly correlate with what's affecting today's youth generation -- the same one being replaced, as inferred to by Charlie Kirk in his post.
It would make sense that if the people who actually cared about that replacement would talk to the person who has been fairly vocal about these issues recently. Even if Nick is a troll it doesn't discount the truth of what's happening. If Kirk actually wanted actionable solutions, he SHOULD be talking to Fuentes to address what his plans are to actually fix these problems, instead of simply saying "feminism bad; men need to get married to good women".
Yeah, mate, great... but how are you going to fix any of the issues that led to the current situation being the way that it is?
Charlie kirk is a faggot. The normie right is trying hard to capture this nationalist movement, the tribal movement, in order to circle the wagons around a massive group of Jews, blacks, Asians, Latinos, whatever trash they call american now. "America has always had Jews! America has always meant blacks! Real Americans include the Asians that migrated here before Europeans!"
No. We either have sovereignty or we are anyone can be justified to come into our homes and take what they will because of big tent multi racial egalitarianism.
A lot of boomers (and their “anti-racist” ideological progeny) hang their hats on the “illegal versus legal immigration” distinction, but it’s a distinction without a difference. The arbitrary whims of the legislature or the judiciary do not magically transform the great replacement into a morally acceptable thing that we must all embrace. All mass immigration is invasion. All mass immigration is disastrous for the native population. If your government is forcing mass immigration upon you, then they are an existential threat to you, and you should defend yourselves by any and all appropriate means.
Because the legal immigration limit is 675,000 per year. That's not mass immigration.
Legal immigrants typically buy houses, make friends, learn some English, and participate. They spent a lot of money and time getting here. Even if they're not compatible like Muslims they are least still want basic infrastructure to work.
"Want basic infrastructure to work" the standard of what is an american, lol my sides.
Its like the question: what is a woman? You disrespect us, and yourself if you are a white american, when you reduce us to merely people that agree that we "want basic infrastructure to work." That is a massive insult to us all. A woman is someone that wants to be a woman. No, a woman, a man, an American, an Englishman, is much more than some catch all bullshit that waters down who we truly are in order to accommodate more and more outsiders.
I'm sure Haitians want their infrastructure to work, even if they don't have any idea how to make it work.
As opposed to illegal immigrants like the caravans during Biden admin. They don't care if the water breaks or the sewers clog, they'll just move on to another place to destroy.
And you think the legal jeets, Hispanics, Asians, Arabs, and Africans wont? You’re woefully ignorant and completely oblivious if you haven’t seen how they’ve already massively degraded the quality of life in America.
He's not ignorant. He knows what he is doing. It is malice.
Does it require more dirt cookies?
That's absolutely mass migration. We can do with 10% of that number. Integration can optimally take place in 3 generations, but if people are settling into ethnic enclaves, then we are looking at 6, maybe 8 generations, if that. It's pants on head retarded to have that many immigrants with no incentive to assimilate besides hope and pixie dust.
Even as a Civic Nationalist, I tell you this absolute truth: the fact that they are not compatible is proof that they should be made to leave.
How many generations if the majority of the media is telling them that every failure they experience in life is due to native whites conspiring against them, and gives 24 hour coverage for a month every time someone with their skin color gets shot by a white cop?
It doesn't. that's why you would never do that if you wanted to actually integrate anyone.
lol 0.2% is mass immigration?
It's encouraging to see how anti-immigrant you guys are, disappointing how irrational.
0.2 a year is about 5% a generation. One in 20 of an entire generational cohort is absolutely 'mass'.
By that definition the only time in 250 years that US hasn't had mass immigration was between 1930-1945.
Doubt you'll convince many people only that period was okay, but sure go ahead and try.
Fuck off, we're full.
You're full NPC.
Should have let Russia get Wernher von Braun because 'legal immigrants bad'. /golfclap
So, how many curryniggers are you inviting into your neighborhood?
We have 10x this number of actual Americans who need taking care of before we should be offering a single loaf of bread to non-Americans. By your own admittance they are buying up houses when American home ownership is at all time lows, and can do so because they are wealthy enough to spend "a lot of money" to get here.
So even when you are trying to make them sound like a good thing, you are showing they are still a problem.
Americans don't need 'taking care of', that's pussy language. Housing is tight because of 40 million illegals not legals.
You guys really don't want successful white Christians and scientists coming here from Poland? Weird. What about this Graham Linehan - an Irishman, classic American stock - he seems like a stand-up dude.
You're just a little reddit hivemind clone, believe whatever your clique believes, with no sane rationale for it.
When the government is involved, its literally their job and duty to put American needs above foreign ones. If they wish to not be responsible for that, then they can stop taking my taxes which they claim are literally for that purpose.
Half my town is owned by Asian and Indian immigrants, fully legally here but living in another state, who simply used all that money they had to buy up all the houses or open land to build cheap properties on.
I know this may shock you, but some of us can think beyond "WHITE GOOD" and our opposition to immigration isn't created on racial hatred.
Haha. You use pussy victim language, complain about Asians and Indians while claiming you're colorblind. Apparently can't even afford a house.
You and your buds think less legal immigration than our entire history except for the Great Depression is 'mass migration'.
If you guys are representing the younger generations no wonder the Asians outcompete you.
Said nothing of the sort, I said my issue with immigration was regardless of color. If there were a large contingent of Poles doing it, the problem would remain a problem.
I know reading gets in the way of your masturbation exercise here, but at least try to follow.
Sure you just added those extraneous details for no reason. What'd you have for lunch? lol you're just against legal immigrants bc racist.
Which is fine, I mean whatever dude.
You led off with a thing that’s objectively bad. Unless you somehow think Americans under 50 aren’t having enough trouble buying houses already?
Are you guys all morons? There's a deficit of something like 1.5 million homes and 30+ million illegals. They live ten to a rental unit, drive up rents, people of means choose to by a house instead of renting, housing prices go up from demand. It's basic supply and demand. More demand, higher prices.
People coming here legally becoming invested into the welfare of the country is objectively not a bad thing. People with roots want the country to succeed, whereas illegals that can be deported at any time are just out for their short-term benefit (are parasites).
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Do not advocate for the death of users.
I don't trust Charlie Kirk any more than I do the rest of the controlled opposition Con Inc, but a W is a W. Be happy that the Overton Window is shifting.
Is it really shifting?
Someone recently called in and asked Charlie if he would speak with Nick Fuentes, and Charlie completely dismissed the question as "bad faith". He seems to say that a lot. It doesn't matter if anyone agrees or disagrees with either one, but at least being able to speak about pressing matters and address the elephants in the room might at least help put people on the right path for correcting some of the problems.
Nevertheless, he seems to be placating the more vocal members of his community, but acknowledgment without action is fruitless.
Yes. Because Nick is explicitly bad faith, and is a degenerate meztizo mongrel by his own analysis, who has no business being in America.
Dude in 10 out of 10 outcomes Charlie Kirk would sabotage his career by speaking with Nick. He's never going to do it. The Overton window would have to basically teleport for that to happen.
You guys are like "If Andrew Jackson doesn't rise from the dead and take the White House then nothing is happening"
That's the crux of the matter there. Kirk's career is more important than speaking about the actual issues in an actionable and productive way. He can proselytise good vibes and "doing the right thing", but he oftentimes ignores the catalysts behind the problems that he's not exactly addressing head-on -- other than to spout platitudes to get a few nods from his followers, and silence some of his more vocal detractors.
He hides behind "bad faith questions" as a retort all the time as a way to save face for -- as you pointed out -- his career. It's a way to dodge the actual issues plaguing the modern male youth in first-world nations.
Oh, my bad. I didn't realize that people's willingness to talk to Nick Fuentes was the litmus test for Overton Window shifts. Silly me.
It is. Because it means people are willing to engage with actual problems instead of dancing around obvious issues and pretending that just "getting married and having kids" will fix the jogger problem, the immigration problems, the rape gangs in England, Sweden, Denmark, Germany and France, and the housing crises affecting a nearly non-existent middle-class in first-world nations.
Charlie putting out empty platitudes doesn't change what's actually happening. The Overton Window doesn't shift until people who enact action in any of the regions where the Great Replacement is happening actually put forward policies that people can openly talk about and get behind to STOP the replacement. Otherwise, it's pointless bloviating.
Dude, even if Nick Fuentes’ professed beliefs were smack dab in the middle of the Overton Window—and by the way, the second they were, he’d change all of them to be more extreme, because that’s the kind of person he is—it would still be dumb to engage with him because he’s a flip flopping, bad faith troll who spends more time winding his audience up to attack putative allies than basically anything else. At best, he’s completely incapable of prioritization or nuance. At worst—and more likely—he’s overtly hostile to any real right-wing progress being made.
It doesn't matter what his beliefs are, he's talking about things impacting the average young White male in the U.K., and the U.S., in open and honest ways that almost none of the anti-establishment voices are. There's no question he's a plant, but he's a plant using talking points that directly correlate with what's affecting today's youth generation -- the same one being replaced, as inferred to by Charlie Kirk in his post.
It would make sense that if the people who actually cared about that replacement would talk to the person who has been fairly vocal about these issues recently. Even if Nick is a troll it doesn't discount the truth of what's happening. If Kirk actually wanted actionable solutions, he SHOULD be talking to Fuentes to address what his plans are to actually fix these problems, instead of simply saying "feminism bad; men need to get married to good women".
Yeah, mate, great... but how are you going to fix any of the issues that led to the current situation being the way that it is?
Charlie kirk is a faggot. The normie right is trying hard to capture this nationalist movement, the tribal movement, in order to circle the wagons around a massive group of Jews, blacks, Asians, Latinos, whatever trash they call american now. "America has always had Jews! America has always meant blacks! Real Americans include the Asians that migrated here before Europeans!"
No. We either have sovereignty or we are anyone can be justified to come into our homes and take what they will because of big tent multi racial egalitarianism.