Dude, even if Nick Fuentes’ professed beliefs were smack dab in the middle of the Overton Window—and by the way, the second they were, he’d change all of them to be more extreme, because that’s the kind of person he is—it would still be dumb to engage with him because he’s a flip flopping, bad faith troll who spends more time winding his audience up to attack putative allies than basically anything else. At best, he’s completely incapable of prioritization or nuance. At worst—and more likely—he’s overtly hostile to any real right-wing progress being made.
It doesn't matter what his beliefs are, he's talking about things impacting the average young White male in the U.K., and the U.S., in open and honest ways that almost none of the anti-establishment voices are. There's no question he's a plant, but he's a plant using talking points that directly correlate with what's affecting today's youth generation -- the same one being replaced, as inferred to by Charlie Kirk in his post.
It would make sense that if the people who actually cared about that replacement would talk to the person who has been fairly vocal about these issues recently. Even if Nick is a troll it doesn't discount the truth of what's happening. If Kirk actually wanted actionable solutions, he SHOULD be talking to Fuentes to address what his plans are to actually fix these problems, instead of simply saying "feminism bad; men need to get married to good women".
Yeah, mate, great... but how are you going to fix any of the issues that led to the current situation being the way that it is?
Dude, even if Nick Fuentes’ professed beliefs were smack dab in the middle of the Overton Window—and by the way, the second they were, he’d change all of them to be more extreme, because that’s the kind of person he is—it would still be dumb to engage with him because he’s a flip flopping, bad faith troll who spends more time winding his audience up to attack putative allies than basically anything else. At best, he’s completely incapable of prioritization or nuance. At worst—and more likely—he’s overtly hostile to any real right-wing progress being made.
It doesn't matter what his beliefs are, he's talking about things impacting the average young White male in the U.K., and the U.S., in open and honest ways that almost none of the anti-establishment voices are. There's no question he's a plant, but he's a plant using talking points that directly correlate with what's affecting today's youth generation -- the same one being replaced, as inferred to by Charlie Kirk in his post.
It would make sense that if the people who actually cared about that replacement would talk to the person who has been fairly vocal about these issues recently. Even if Nick is a troll it doesn't discount the truth of what's happening. If Kirk actually wanted actionable solutions, he SHOULD be talking to Fuentes to address what his plans are to actually fix these problems, instead of simply saying "feminism bad; men need to get married to good women".
Yeah, mate, great... but how are you going to fix any of the issues that led to the current situation being the way that it is?